Monday, November 7, 2011

Cain “4th Accuser” press conference // Update – alleges sexual advance after termination of employment

Legal Insurrection

excerpts:
  • Woman alleges that in 1997 after her employment terminated with a National Restaurant Association affiliate, Cain made a single sexual advance at her which she rebuffed and which he stopped after she said no. So the allegation is not one of workplace “sexual harassment” but of an alleged attempt at infidelity.
  • Name of accuser is Sharon Bialek, relates to 1995-96 when working for NRA education foundation in Chicago. Hired to work on hospitality-business alliance new initiative. Employed mid 2006-2007 (?) – Allred must have years off.
  • Didn’t file complaint against Cain because not employed by foundation when it happened. Coming forward on behalf of all women “sexually harassed in the workplace.”
Comment:

If Cain is lying, that's bad.  To me, that's the worse of it.  If he made an advance, was rebuffed, and it ended there, no big deal.

If there's anything good about this, at least it is happening now.  Better now than later.

This woman getting a lawyer and saying she's doing it for all women- that's bullcrap.   Why does she need a lawyer over something that's this far into the past?  What is she doing for all women?  Making them look bad, that's what I think.

He is accused of making a pass at her.  Whoop de friggin doo.

No comments: