Compares NRA with ISIS, and ISIS comes out on top. Way to go, Mikey! /sarc
Question: Does Moore really believe that ISIS is just a misunderstood group that we persecute for no good reason, and that the NRA is a beastly outfit that kills people by the millions?
That is what he said.
Like I said, liberals will say anything, and you know Moore doesn't believe what he is saying, so that makes him a liar.
By the way, Planned Parenthood has killed more babies than ISIS has. And that's a fact. They don't kill off their young, but we do.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Saturday, February 24, 2018
Collusion against Trump Timeline
Very detailed. My impressions are confirming my suspicions.
For example, a phony dossier is used to obtain a warrant against Carter Page, who isn't even the target. The judge who approves this FISA warrant is an Obama appointee.
The problem here is one of time. Any interested party has to go through an enormous amount of effort to dig out the truth. The liars, on the other hand, can make stuff up faster than you can uncover it.
Also, you don't find out their lies until afterward, when nobody is paying attention. So, Comey can say to Congress that he never leaked, only to admit later when he can no longer deny it, that he did. This is after he got what he wanted, which was a Special Counsel-- his good buddy Mueller.
Also, you find out later that Rosenstein signs off on the phony FISA surveillance after he names Mueller as Special Prosecutor. They all have to know it was all based upon unverified information that wasn't even supposed to get to the FISA court in the first place.
This is my second timeline source. I had forgotten the first. Again, there's a lot of information here. It could take an hour to go through it all.
Update on same day:
4:23 pm :
Went offline for a thinking session. So, here's a big speculation alert. Reason
being, that I don't have evidence to support this. But still...
The shooting suspect was said to have been seen wearing a "MAGA" cap. He also was
seen wearing ISIS gear. That seems to indicate that the kid was up to speed on current
events.
The speculation comes in as to whether or not he studied guys like Lee Harvey Oswald.
Oswald was this big loser type, who made a name for himself by assassinating a President.
Could Cruz been motivated to seek out a name for himself by killing a bunch of kids?
It wouldn't have to be just killing kids, you see. He might know about the Russian
collusion thing, and, get this, the Seth Rich murder. Just put two and two together
and see the possible connections here. Wasserman-Shultz's brother had something to
do with the murder investigation in DC. What if this kid thinks that he could make
a name for himself if he attacks a liberal bastion that leaves itself open to an
attack?
Kennedy did. He was very fatalistic about it. Oswald took advantage. Could this
Cruz kid have done the same?
So, if the Dems don't really care, and all that matters to them is power, could one
person like this think he could make a difference? Also, could he have known that
when he did what he did? They left themselves open to this, just as Kennedy did.
Not saying what he did was right. Only trying to understand how he might have been
motivated to do what he did, and how it might all fit into the bigger story.
Can't help think that these things are related. There is definitely something connected
to the Seth Rich murder, and that is Wasserman-Shultz. She fixes the nomination for
Hillary. Seth Rich was a Sanders supporter. The leaks occur, and Rich gets murdered.
Somehow, they can't find the murderer, and Wasserman-Shultz brother is in on the
"investigation". How convenient!
All of this just a coincidence? Nobody really wants to find out the truth of what
happened to Seth Rich? By the time Rich is murdered, they already had their
"insurance policy" in mind. You can see that from the timelines.
To kill Rich means to save the insurance policy. If the worst happened, and Trump
was elected, then they could still put it into effect. But not if Rich lived, and
talked. Dead men tell no tales.
As for the kid, he is just following what Freud said about motivation. You have
the sex urge, and the urge to be great. The kid is just trying to be great.
Unfortunately, some kids had to die for him to make a name for himself.
2:00 pm:
A joke here. ( which may not be a joke ) I'm waiting for Agent Smith to show up and tell me how disappointed he is.
That first timeline is more detailed. The two lovebirds who exchanged texts, were texting about a "secret society". Before all you start talking about conspiracy theories, take that.
For example, a phony dossier is used to obtain a warrant against Carter Page, who isn't even the target. The judge who approves this FISA warrant is an Obama appointee.
The problem here is one of time. Any interested party has to go through an enormous amount of effort to dig out the truth. The liars, on the other hand, can make stuff up faster than you can uncover it.
Also, you don't find out their lies until afterward, when nobody is paying attention. So, Comey can say to Congress that he never leaked, only to admit later when he can no longer deny it, that he did. This is after he got what he wanted, which was a Special Counsel-- his good buddy Mueller.
Also, you find out later that Rosenstein signs off on the phony FISA surveillance after he names Mueller as Special Prosecutor. They all have to know it was all based upon unverified information that wasn't even supposed to get to the FISA court in the first place.
This is my second timeline source. I had forgotten the first. Again, there's a lot of information here. It could take an hour to go through it all.
Update on same day:
4:23 pm :
Went offline for a thinking session. So, here's a big speculation alert. Reason
being, that I don't have evidence to support this. But still...
The shooting suspect was said to have been seen wearing a "MAGA" cap. He also was
seen wearing ISIS gear. That seems to indicate that the kid was up to speed on current
events.
The speculation comes in as to whether or not he studied guys like Lee Harvey Oswald.
Oswald was this big loser type, who made a name for himself by assassinating a President.
Could Cruz been motivated to seek out a name for himself by killing a bunch of kids?
It wouldn't have to be just killing kids, you see. He might know about the Russian
collusion thing, and, get this, the Seth Rich murder. Just put two and two together
and see the possible connections here. Wasserman-Shultz's brother had something to
do with the murder investigation in DC. What if this kid thinks that he could make
a name for himself if he attacks a liberal bastion that leaves itself open to an
attack?
Kennedy did. He was very fatalistic about it. Oswald took advantage. Could this
Cruz kid have done the same?
So, if the Dems don't really care, and all that matters to them is power, could one
person like this think he could make a difference? Also, could he have known that
when he did what he did? They left themselves open to this, just as Kennedy did.
Not saying what he did was right. Only trying to understand how he might have been
motivated to do what he did, and how it might all fit into the bigger story.
Can't help think that these things are related. There is definitely something connected
to the Seth Rich murder, and that is Wasserman-Shultz. She fixes the nomination for
Hillary. Seth Rich was a Sanders supporter. The leaks occur, and Rich gets murdered.
Somehow, they can't find the murderer, and Wasserman-Shultz brother is in on the
"investigation". How convenient!
All of this just a coincidence? Nobody really wants to find out the truth of what
happened to Seth Rich? By the time Rich is murdered, they already had their
"insurance policy" in mind. You can see that from the timelines.
To kill Rich means to save the insurance policy. If the worst happened, and Trump
was elected, then they could still put it into effect. But not if Rich lived, and
talked. Dead men tell no tales.
As for the kid, he is just following what Freud said about motivation. You have
the sex urge, and the urge to be great. The kid is just trying to be great.
Unfortunately, some kids had to die for him to make a name for himself.
2:00 pm:
A joke here. ( which may not be a joke ) I'm waiting for Agent Smith to show up and tell me how disappointed he is.
That first timeline is more detailed. The two lovebirds who exchanged texts, were texting about a "secret society". Before all you start talking about conspiracy theories, take that.
"Collusion against Trump" timeline https://t.co/mCz8H8bc0i— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) February 24, 2018
Challenger to Wasserman-Shultz wants to probe Rich's murder
Update
2.24.18:
8:48 am:
I looked to see if the election has been held yet. Not sure. It takes up too much of limited bandwidth. But it looks like it hasn't yet.
I notice that the Sanders bunch won't endorse Canova, who wants to investigate Rich's murder. Looks like a cover up at all levels of the Democrat Party, and that includes a socialist.
8:30 am:
It is worth mentioning that Wasserman-Shultz is the representative to this area in Broward County, where the latest shooting occurred.
It is mere coincidence, or is there something here? So much seems to get left out.
Originally posted 6.29.17:
The investigation of the murdered DNC staffer, Seth Rich, is the focus of the campaign against Wasserman-Shultz. Canova, the challenger, says he wants the rule of law to prevail.
That would be nice, but he'd better watch his back.
The Democrats are acting more like a criminal organization than a political party. If anything, they should be demanding the truth of what happened to Rich, but they are resisting it.
All of the talk about Russia is a smoke screen to hide the truth.
Conspiracy theory? What do you call the Russian hacking claims? This Russian nonsense is being done without a shred of evidence. Why would the Democrats spend so much time on something that has no basis in fact, while at the same time, resist a probe into an actual murder of one of their own people?
2.24.18:
8:48 am:
I looked to see if the election has been held yet. Not sure. It takes up too much of limited bandwidth. But it looks like it hasn't yet.
I notice that the Sanders bunch won't endorse Canova, who wants to investigate Rich's murder. Looks like a cover up at all levels of the Democrat Party, and that includes a socialist.
8:30 am:
It is worth mentioning that Wasserman-Shultz is the representative to this area in Broward County, where the latest shooting occurred.
It is mere coincidence, or is there something here? So much seems to get left out.
Originally posted 6.29.17:
The investigation of the murdered DNC staffer, Seth Rich, is the focus of the campaign against Wasserman-Shultz. Canova, the challenger, says he wants the rule of law to prevail.
That would be nice, but he'd better watch his back.
The Democrats are acting more like a criminal organization than a political party. If anything, they should be demanding the truth of what happened to Rich, but they are resisting it.
All of the talk about Russia is a smoke screen to hide the truth.
Conspiracy theory? What do you call the Russian hacking claims? This Russian nonsense is being done without a shred of evidence. Why would the Democrats spend so much time on something that has no basis in fact, while at the same time, resist a probe into an actual murder of one of their own people?
Corporations are just SO conservative ( not )
Well, this post will be short. The reason is that you just have to point out things, and a long post might not do it justice.
The point is that the left controls the corporations, and the fact that a number of corporations are boycotting the NRA pretty much demonstrates that. Also, keep in mind the NFL has gone super lib.
I know that so-called conservatives are supposed to be so happy about the tax cuts for the corporations. This is the thanks you get, suckers.
In a seemingly unrelated post that I would like to comment upon. Lawrence O'Donnell ( I think that is his name ) claims that an AR15 is a better weapon in the school environment, if I am understanding him correctly.
That reminds me of a writing about the Indian fighter in Texas in the nineteenth century, Rip Ford, who said that in an Indian fight, a bow and arrow is better than a six shooter in some situations. You have to look at the situation. In a school setting, a long gun may be a hindrance. Also, the rapid fire uses a lot of ammo, requiring frequent reloads. There were more deputies than just one who wouldn't go in. If these guys coordinated, like they should have, that guy would have understood his problem, and would have had less time to shoot at kids. In other words, O'Donnell is wrong.
My guess is that O'Donnell knows he's wrong, and he's just lying. A lot of people think liberals are stupid. Many are, but the heart of liberalism is evil. You cannot always pretend to be stupid as this seems to be. The point is that liberals will say ANYTHING.
Liberalism delenda est!
Updated on same day...
...
Looks like there's too many white people in Europe?!? Hey, white people gotta go. Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civ has gotta go! ( Jesse Jackson chant )
Yeah, but that's because white folks is just so racist.
...
Looks like there's too many white people in Europe?!? Hey, white people gotta go. Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civ has gotta go! ( Jesse Jackson chant )
Yeah, but that's because white folks is just so racist.
Trump — Middle American Radical
Trump — Middle American Radical: Read more on Buchanan.Org...
- By Patrick J. Buchanan
- President Trump is the leader of America's conservative party.
- After World War II, as it became clear our long-ruling liberal elites had blundered horribly in trusting Stalin, patriots arose to cleanse our institutions of treason and its fellow travelers.
- "Trump Isn't a Conservative — And That's a Good Thing," Frank Cannon comes close to the mark.
comment:
Liberalism delenda est!!!
Update on original post of 2.23.18:
2.24.18:
It reminds me of the "choose your own destructor" type of post on Instapundit. Trump is the giant marshmallow man. Bwah, hah, hah!
Update on original post of 2.23.18:
2.24.18:
It reminds me of the "choose your own destructor" type of post on Instapundit. Trump is the giant marshmallow man. Bwah, hah, hah!
Friday, February 23, 2018
Don Surber: CNN is going to get someone killed
Don Surber: CNN is going to get someone killed: Jeff Zucker has turned CNN into a crazy place where a townhall meeting on violence almost cost a NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch her life. The...
comment:
Dana Loesch said that she needed a security detail in order to get out of the townhall. There were those there who were threatening her personally.
Yes, and that is what you should have expected. Indeed, it is something that they had prepared for --- otherwise, why have a security team in place?
Somehow, it all seems insufficient. Something is missing here...
comment:
Dana Loesch said that she needed a security detail in order to get out of the townhall. There were those there who were threatening her personally.
Yes, and that is what you should have expected. Indeed, it is something that they had prepared for --- otherwise, why have a security team in place?
Somehow, it all seems insufficient. Something is missing here...
Always the premises
Update:
2.23.18:
The Conservative Treehouse is on this like stink on poop. Thank God we still have an outlet for real news, not fake news.
How much of the information that is presented there will actually get out to the people? As bad as conditions are, it is hard for me to believe that people would be convinced that gun control is a solution for this.
Law enforcement in Broward County is a joke. It is a wonder that things aren't a whole helluva lot worse than this. The armed officer at the scene did nothing to stop the mayhem. Not a thing. Crimes are being covered up in order to make crime stats look better. There was a tape delay in their security camera system. The purpose of this delay? To cover up a crime if it happens. Un-freaking-believable. Cops were chasing after a suspect who had already left the scene because this tape misled officers due to the tape delay.
Why is Broward County Florida like this? They vote overwhelmingly Democrat. Yet, somehow, we need gun control. Go figure.
Liberalism delenda est!
2.22.18:
It may not be such a hot idea just to give all the schools a metal detector. The reason is that somehow the rest of us are to blame for somebody else's failure. Especially when it comes to liberals.
Isn't that the premise here? It is never the fault of those at the scene, it is the NRA. It is the Republicans. It is always somebody else. It is never the liberals and their cockeyed ideas.
So, don't let the money be the obstacle. If we have to bail out liberal schools with the "gun-free zones", then we must exact a price for it.
There has to be an acknowledgement that so-called "gun-free zones" are not safe, and require extra security precautions. The acknowledgement must be signed by all who participate in the gun-free zone. That is to say, if you are going to insist upon your gun-free zone, then do so at your own risk. You must also give a copy of your signed acknowledgement to all the parents of the kids that attend that school. The parents can have the option of taking their kids to a safer school.
Secondly, if there are any "diversion" measures being taken, that too must be signed off and acknowledged. That too, must be disclosed to parents.
By signing off on high-risk practices, those who agree to doing so will hold the rest of us harmless when the SHTF. Given that it is the liberals who are at fault for their cockeyed ideas failing, then we can always point to their acknowledgement and say "see, I told you so."
2.23.18:
The Conservative Treehouse is on this like stink on poop. Thank God we still have an outlet for real news, not fake news.
How much of the information that is presented there will actually get out to the people? As bad as conditions are, it is hard for me to believe that people would be convinced that gun control is a solution for this.
Law enforcement in Broward County is a joke. It is a wonder that things aren't a whole helluva lot worse than this. The armed officer at the scene did nothing to stop the mayhem. Not a thing. Crimes are being covered up in order to make crime stats look better. There was a tape delay in their security camera system. The purpose of this delay? To cover up a crime if it happens. Un-freaking-believable. Cops were chasing after a suspect who had already left the scene because this tape misled officers due to the tape delay.
Why is Broward County Florida like this? They vote overwhelmingly Democrat. Yet, somehow, we need gun control. Go figure.
Liberalism delenda est!
2.22.18:
It may not be such a hot idea just to give all the schools a metal detector. The reason is that somehow the rest of us are to blame for somebody else's failure. Especially when it comes to liberals.
Isn't that the premise here? It is never the fault of those at the scene, it is the NRA. It is the Republicans. It is always somebody else. It is never the liberals and their cockeyed ideas.
So, don't let the money be the obstacle. If we have to bail out liberal schools with the "gun-free zones", then we must exact a price for it.
There has to be an acknowledgement that so-called "gun-free zones" are not safe, and require extra security precautions. The acknowledgement must be signed by all who participate in the gun-free zone. That is to say, if you are going to insist upon your gun-free zone, then do so at your own risk. You must also give a copy of your signed acknowledgement to all the parents of the kids that attend that school. The parents can have the option of taking their kids to a safer school.
Secondly, if there are any "diversion" measures being taken, that too must be signed off and acknowledged. That too, must be disclosed to parents.
By signing off on high-risk practices, those who agree to doing so will hold the rest of us harmless when the SHTF. Given that it is the liberals who are at fault for their cockeyed ideas failing, then we can always point to their acknowledgement and say "see, I told you so."
Thursday, February 22, 2018
More evidence to support my theory
That the political left wing is at the root of all the trouble in this country.
NBC has decided to run this as an editorial, which criticizes Elon Musk for wanting to colonize Mars.
Yep. This is why there has been so little material advancement in this country for the last 50 years or so. Rampant leftism is destroying this country. Time to destroy them in return. Dammit.
Liberalism delenda est!
NBC has decided to run this as an editorial, which criticizes Elon Musk for wanting to colonize Mars.
Yep. This is why there has been so little material advancement in this country for the last 50 years or so. Rampant leftism is destroying this country. Time to destroy them in return. Dammit.
Liberalism delenda est!
Of course it costs too much
Cost benefit ratio analysis to stop school shootings: "It just ain't gonna happen. There may be a better solution."
comment:
What did I tell you?
I would pay the money, if that meant that these people would not be able to politicize it any further.
No, I wouldn't hire Feds to do the job. He said that Feds would do it. No, you don't have to hire Feds.
You could take the security expenditures out of their other money.
comment:
What did I tell you?
I would pay the money, if that meant that these people would not be able to politicize it any further.
No, I wouldn't hire Feds to do the job. He said that Feds would do it. No, you don't have to hire Feds.
You could take the security expenditures out of their other money.
M-DSPD Cover Up – The Curious Case Of Trayvon Martin’s Backpack With Stolen Jewelry and Burglary Tool…
Update:
2.22.18:
Yes, it is true that the website was on to Trayvon Martin a long time ago. But even more important, they were on to this scam of not reporting crimes as they happen.
That is how a guy who shouldn't have been able to legally buy a gun was able to buy a friggin' gun.
The CTH said they warned these guys about this. But now that something else has happened, they want gun control.
Riiigght.
7.14.13:
theconservativetreehouse.
quote:
I heard something about this, but here's the full story. Some people have been following this rather closely, but not me. It looks rather amazing to me how much stuff got suppressed in the media as well as in the trial.
Nevertheless, even though Martin was no angel, nobody has the right to shoot him. Even if he was a serial murderer, there is no right to shoot him.
All the more reason to believe that the case was converted into an black-white thing and people got drawn into the politics of the thing. The truth is the first casualty of war and make no mistake, this was a war. The war will go on.
2.22.18:
Yes, it is true that the website was on to Trayvon Martin a long time ago. But even more important, they were on to this scam of not reporting crimes as they happen.
That is how a guy who shouldn't have been able to legally buy a gun was able to buy a friggin' gun.
The CTH said they warned these guys about this. But now that something else has happened, they want gun control.
Riiigght.
7.14.13:
theconservativetreehouse.
quote:
It was that Robles article, and the outlining of the Miami-Dade School Police Department’s report on a Trayvon Martin incident from October 2011, that kicked off an internal investigation by M-DSPD Police Chief Hurley against his own officers to find out who leaked the police report.comment:
I heard something about this, but here's the full story. Some people have been following this rather closely, but not me. It looks rather amazing to me how much stuff got suppressed in the media as well as in the trial.
Nevertheless, even though Martin was no angel, nobody has the right to shoot him. Even if he was a serial murderer, there is no right to shoot him.
All the more reason to believe that the case was converted into an black-white thing and people got drawn into the politics of the thing. The truth is the first casualty of war and make no mistake, this was a war. The war will go on.
A few crime stats to bore you
Update:
2.21.18:
8:30 am:
What a great site that Conservative Treehouse is! They had stuff on Trayvon Martin that even I didn't know about. I spent some time on the subject of Trayvon Martin. There were many posts on the subject here. Even with a lot of info being suppressed on Martin, it was plain to me that there was no beef with the guy who shot him.
With this additional information, it is even more plain that the leftist infiltration of our society is making it very hard to get at the truth of any matter. Martin was a thug, you see. This fact was being hidden from the public. A good deal of the population may still think that this was just some poor black kid who was murdered in cold blood. They think this because they are being misled. So it is with the leftists. Truth is not in them. The left is at war with us.
It seems that this guy who shot up the school was another one of their cover ups. Even after they were warned, they didn't stop hiding the problems with this kid. Police reports were falsified. There is no excuse for this.
And now they want gun control.
8:00 am:
In addition to what Sen. Rubio said, Pres. Trump said that we should arm teachers. Actually, you don't need every teacher to tote a gun. Just a few in each school should do it. Combine that with metal detectors, and a bad guy wouldn't have much of an opportunity to create mayhem.
It would work, but that is why these activists don't want to do it.
7:30 am:
At a town hall, Marco Rubio was booed for stating the obvious. The gun control measures these people want will not stop these kinds of crimes. Supposedly, if you were to confiscate all guns, these incidents might become less frequent. However, strict gun control didn't stop these things from happening in Europe.
Yet, if you were to just put in some metal detectors in these schools, it would most likely stop the incidents. Yes, a more determined aggressor might be able to slip some guns in, but the more likely thing is that they would seek easier targets.
The only way gun control will work is if all guns are confiscated, and even then, there would still be some guns out there, and this could still happen.
What is the objection to using metal detectors? They are used elsewhere.
2.21.18:
4:45 pm:
A few more thoughts on the subject, if you please...
Do you realize that nothing is done to stop these events because they are so inconsequential? For if they were of great consequence, surely something would be done. But, this is so cold hearted, you may be thinking. These are children!!!
Yes, that is so. But it is still the truth. As tragic as these murders are, in terms of the life of a very large nation of over 300 million people, it is of little consequence.
Even if the number were 3000, as in the terrorist attacks of 2001, it would still be inconsequential. The short term effects were dramatic, as the nation spent vast sums on a war that still rages. However, in terms of the life of the nation, these losses were minimal. Indeed, if the Pentagon had not been hit, there may not have even been a war.
What made the 2001 attacks consequential was the implied threat against the ruling class. If the ruling class feels threatened, then you can bet that the response will be greater.
So, back to the current noise machine being cranked up--- it is a short time affair in which the politicians may wish to exploit for a short term gain. They will do nothing about this, however, because the issue is worth more to them than actually solving the problem. Yet, the problem itself is of such little significance, that there would be insufficient will to spend the money necessary to secure the schools ( and save the children they claim to love so much ).
So, the money won't be spent. It isn't worth it to them.
11:52 am:
I heard something this morning that gave me the idea to write this post. Here is a statistical breakdown of murders in the USA.
Assault rifles do not account for all that many of the murders. But they do grab a lot of the attention.
The media and the politicians are just playing politics with it. If there was an attempt to actually do something useful, then they would require gun free zones to have metal detectors.
2.21.18:
8:30 am:
What a great site that Conservative Treehouse is! They had stuff on Trayvon Martin that even I didn't know about. I spent some time on the subject of Trayvon Martin. There were many posts on the subject here. Even with a lot of info being suppressed on Martin, it was plain to me that there was no beef with the guy who shot him.
With this additional information, it is even more plain that the leftist infiltration of our society is making it very hard to get at the truth of any matter. Martin was a thug, you see. This fact was being hidden from the public. A good deal of the population may still think that this was just some poor black kid who was murdered in cold blood. They think this because they are being misled. So it is with the leftists. Truth is not in them. The left is at war with us.
It seems that this guy who shot up the school was another one of their cover ups. Even after they were warned, they didn't stop hiding the problems with this kid. Police reports were falsified. There is no excuse for this.
And now they want gun control.
8:00 am:
In addition to what Sen. Rubio said, Pres. Trump said that we should arm teachers. Actually, you don't need every teacher to tote a gun. Just a few in each school should do it. Combine that with metal detectors, and a bad guy wouldn't have much of an opportunity to create mayhem.
It would work, but that is why these activists don't want to do it.
7:30 am:
At a town hall, Marco Rubio was booed for stating the obvious. The gun control measures these people want will not stop these kinds of crimes. Supposedly, if you were to confiscate all guns, these incidents might become less frequent. However, strict gun control didn't stop these things from happening in Europe.
Yet, if you were to just put in some metal detectors in these schools, it would most likely stop the incidents. Yes, a more determined aggressor might be able to slip some guns in, but the more likely thing is that they would seek easier targets.
The only way gun control will work is if all guns are confiscated, and even then, there would still be some guns out there, and this could still happen.
What is the objection to using metal detectors? They are used elsewhere.
2.21.18:
4:45 pm:
A few more thoughts on the subject, if you please...
Do you realize that nothing is done to stop these events because they are so inconsequential? For if they were of great consequence, surely something would be done. But, this is so cold hearted, you may be thinking. These are children!!!
Yes, that is so. But it is still the truth. As tragic as these murders are, in terms of the life of a very large nation of over 300 million people, it is of little consequence.
Even if the number were 3000, as in the terrorist attacks of 2001, it would still be inconsequential. The short term effects were dramatic, as the nation spent vast sums on a war that still rages. However, in terms of the life of the nation, these losses were minimal. Indeed, if the Pentagon had not been hit, there may not have even been a war.
What made the 2001 attacks consequential was the implied threat against the ruling class. If the ruling class feels threatened, then you can bet that the response will be greater.
So, back to the current noise machine being cranked up--- it is a short time affair in which the politicians may wish to exploit for a short term gain. They will do nothing about this, however, because the issue is worth more to them than actually solving the problem. Yet, the problem itself is of such little significance, that there would be insufficient will to spend the money necessary to secure the schools ( and save the children they claim to love so much ).
So, the money won't be spent. It isn't worth it to them.
11:52 am:
I heard something this morning that gave me the idea to write this post. Here is a statistical breakdown of murders in the USA.
Assault rifles do not account for all that many of the murders. But they do grab a lot of the attention.
The media and the politicians are just playing politics with it. If there was an attempt to actually do something useful, then they would require gun free zones to have metal detectors.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Let's not kid ourselves, we are at war already
The defining characteristic of liberalism is its repudiation of truth. It can be seen in the philosophy of post-modernism, in which there is no objective truth. Liberals are attracted to post-modernism like flies to excrement.
Conservatives fail to appreciate this, I think. Whenever you attempt to argue with a liberal, you are going to run into this post-modern mindset. You cannot argue facts with them. Facts are meaningless to a person who will not consider facts. You cannot reason with them, because reason itself is disputed. You cannot argue morality with them, because they embrace raging amorality.
The only way to deal with liberalism is to reject it. For that is what they do to the rest of us. If they will not accept the truth for what it is, then they must not be accepted themselves. Reality is what it is, not what the liberals want to dream up. "Boys will be boys"--- not let girls be boys and vice versa. Sanity must be defended. Post-modernist thinking has to go.
Liberalism and post-modernism is one and the same. It is the post-modern mindset that is the problem. This must be engaged on its own terms. Liberals seek to destroy truth and meaning with their denial of its existence. This must be stopped, or they will succeed. Liberalism delenda est, lest we become their victims. Liberalism is like Dracula--- vampiric in its nature.
The Florida massacre, and those like them, are not caused by guns. These massacres are caused by the left for the purpose of disarming the rest of us. The only response to them is "molṑn labé ", for this is war.
If they want our guns, let them come and get them. Otherwise, we become like them, and we are lost.
It may sound like a declaration of war, but only because people have convinced themselves that these people aren't at war with us already. Instead of denying the obvious truth that they are at war with us, they must be dealt with on their own terms. Their premises must be rejected. Otherwise, we become more like them.
Conservatives fail to appreciate this, I think. Whenever you attempt to argue with a liberal, you are going to run into this post-modern mindset. You cannot argue facts with them. Facts are meaningless to a person who will not consider facts. You cannot reason with them, because reason itself is disputed. You cannot argue morality with them, because they embrace raging amorality.
The only way to deal with liberalism is to reject it. For that is what they do to the rest of us. If they will not accept the truth for what it is, then they must not be accepted themselves. Reality is what it is, not what the liberals want to dream up. "Boys will be boys"--- not let girls be boys and vice versa. Sanity must be defended. Post-modernist thinking has to go.
Liberalism and post-modernism is one and the same. It is the post-modern mindset that is the problem. This must be engaged on its own terms. Liberals seek to destroy truth and meaning with their denial of its existence. This must be stopped, or they will succeed. Liberalism delenda est, lest we become their victims. Liberalism is like Dracula--- vampiric in its nature.
The Florida massacre, and those like them, are not caused by guns. These massacres are caused by the left for the purpose of disarming the rest of us. The only response to them is "molṑn labé ", for this is war.
If they want our guns, let them come and get them. Otherwise, we become like them, and we are lost.
It may sound like a declaration of war, but only because people have convinced themselves that these people aren't at war with us already. Instead of denying the obvious truth that they are at war with us, they must be dealt with on their own terms. Their premises must be rejected. Otherwise, we become more like them.
Monday, February 19, 2018
The source of the troubles
Still waiting for my extra data. Should be soon, now.
As for what I have been writing during this wait, I have explained my politics
in depth before on this blog. Could I explain even more?
Yes, I could try. As I have written, the scientific/economic progress of this
culture has stagnated. That may bring some argument, since I am writing this on
computer technology which did not exist that long ago. Aside from computers and
such, however, there has been little progress. That is what I mean.
What accounts for this? I have also written about how many technological advances
appeared to have been suppressed. There is little doubt that nuclear power has
been suppressed. But it goes further than that. Much further.
For example, if all we can use is so-called renewable energy, then our material quality of life is going to go down, not up.
The left wing is setting up a false choice. What they are telling us is that we
have to sacrifice our standard of living for the good of the planet.
This is an absurd argument. There is no scientific basis for this, although the
left will point to things like so-called climate science. Climate science is not
science. It is anti-science, which is being funded by the political class. The
political class, therefore, is behind all this. It is my opinion, then, that the
left is behind the lack of material progress of the last half-century.
It is no coincidence, then, that this began during the Vietnam War. The political
left has had it ascendency during this period. The left was successful in stopping
that war, and a good deal more success than just that.
Their success has become so great a drag on this country that the very existence
of this nation is now at stake.
Indeed, if Donald Trump is not successful, then the downward trajectory will
continue.
It is not a racist thing to want this country to succeed, but the left has made it
a racial issue. This is part of where their power is coming from.
There is nobody from any racial group who will benefit in this country if its
existence is imperiled. Yet, the political left has managed to convince a good
part of this society that it should not exist!
A whole lot of babies do not exist, thanks to abortion. We will follow in due
time if this type of thinking isn't defeated.
Leftism is all a big lie. Hopefully, this lie can be exposed for what it is.
As for what I have been writing during this wait, I have explained my politics
in depth before on this blog. Could I explain even more?
Yes, I could try. As I have written, the scientific/economic progress of this
culture has stagnated. That may bring some argument, since I am writing this on
computer technology which did not exist that long ago. Aside from computers and
such, however, there has been little progress. That is what I mean.
What accounts for this? I have also written about how many technological advances
appeared to have been suppressed. There is little doubt that nuclear power has
been suppressed. But it goes further than that. Much further.
For example, if all we can use is so-called renewable energy, then our material quality of life is going to go down, not up.
The left wing is setting up a false choice. What they are telling us is that we
have to sacrifice our standard of living for the good of the planet.
This is an absurd argument. There is no scientific basis for this, although the
left will point to things like so-called climate science. Climate science is not
science. It is anti-science, which is being funded by the political class. The
political class, therefore, is behind all this. It is my opinion, then, that the
left is behind the lack of material progress of the last half-century.
It is no coincidence, then, that this began during the Vietnam War. The political
left has had it ascendency during this period. The left was successful in stopping
that war, and a good deal more success than just that.
Their success has become so great a drag on this country that the very existence
of this nation is now at stake.
Indeed, if Donald Trump is not successful, then the downward trajectory will
continue.
It is not a racist thing to want this country to succeed, but the left has made it
a racial issue. This is part of where their power is coming from.
There is nobody from any racial group who will benefit in this country if its
existence is imperiled. Yet, the political left has managed to convince a good
part of this society that it should not exist!
A whole lot of babies do not exist, thanks to abortion. We will follow in due
time if this type of thinking isn't defeated.
Leftism is all a big lie. Hopefully, this lie can be exposed for what it is.
Sunday, February 18, 2018
Time for a change in the media
I left off yesterday with the thought that being somewhat offline was making it
a bit harder to post. Usually, I get my news from the internet. What did I do
before the internet? It was newspapers, radio, and television.
These media are getting harder to access, or so it seems. Sure, there are
newspapers still, and radio still, and television still, but they have increasing
problems with each, it seems. Take newspapers, for example. In Houston, there is
only one major paper now. For the longest time, there were two. At one time, there
may have been more than two, but that was before my time. I know that there may
have been three for a long time.
Television reception out here is atrocious. If you want television, you have to
pay for it. But in Houston, there were plenty of off the air television stations.
Radio out here is pretty bad too. I can't get any am stations. Just noise.
The fm stations were about music. The one news broadcast was your usual hate
Trump message.
Which brings me back to where I was before. The liberals control the message that
gets out to people. This is a red state in a red area, but the liberals control
the message that gets out to the people in this area. It may not affect the voting
patterns here, as people out here are more conservative, but the media is still
liberal. Seems like you cannot get away from it.
How do you fight this leftward drift in our culture?
People have to hear something different than what they are hearing. The message
needs to be more balanced.
There was an author who once said that the medium is the message. Maybe times have
changed that to the media IS the message. The media has to change. The media wants to
change us. We should change THEM, instead.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)