There are some on the left who want to pack the court once they get back into power.
Okay, you people. This is the thing that brings out the warriors in you, that is, if you are out there.
For, if the leftists get their way, and pack the court with leftists, then the US Constitution is dead. It may seem as if it is dead already, but once these guys finish with it, then it will really be dead.
By that time, you will have to ask yourself a question. Do you want to accept this coup as the law of the land, or will you fight?
But by that time, it will be too late. They will have the reigns of power.
Here is a suggestion ( amongst many ). A constitutional convention. Yes, if you limit what the courts may do, you may stop this event from happening.
Who knows? The left might go for this if it means that they can keep their mickey mouse lefty fiefdoms intact. ( like Wash. DC )
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Saturday, June 30, 2018
Friday, June 29, 2018
Bernard Goldberg: How the unhinged left helps Trump
Goldberg is no big fan of Trump, if memory serves.
In my opinion, the left knows that they are wrong. If Trump was Hitler, they would be against gun control. Trust me on that one. No way they disarm if a Hitler was on the loose.
The so-called right has been guilty of moral cowardice for far too long. The left thinks that another guilt trip will work. Maybe not this time. The guilt tripping has hit a dead end. ( I hope. )
In my opinion, the left knows that they are wrong. If Trump was Hitler, they would be against gun control. Trust me on that one. No way they disarm if a Hitler was on the loose.
The so-called right has been guilty of moral cowardice for far too long. The left thinks that another guilt trip will work. Maybe not this time. The guilt tripping has hit a dead end. ( I hope. )
How the unhinged left is helping Donald Trump https://t.co/QMYQ0SBhuU— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) June 29, 2018
Thursday, June 28, 2018
Back to this dreary business...
A somewhat serious discussion about a potential Civil War.
One thing I always note is a lack of organization. It's all individualistic. I don't care how badass these characters are, they will be deterred by a serious organization that can and will act.
That is what I believe. Therefore, they will be no war. Nobody on the so-called right wants to organize. They are letting themselves be set up for this, but what this is is not a civil war, but a coup.
If you think that is pedantic, then so be it. A war needs two parties, and so far, I see only one. A coup only needs to topple the existing order. If you care about that, you'd better get busy.
One thing I always note is a lack of organization. It's all individualistic. I don't care how badass these characters are, they will be deterred by a serious organization that can and will act.
That is what I believe. Therefore, they will be no war. Nobody on the so-called right wants to organize. They are letting themselves be set up for this, but what this is is not a civil war, but a coup.
If you think that is pedantic, then so be it. A war needs two parties, and so far, I see only one. A coup only needs to topple the existing order. If you care about that, you'd better get busy.
Houston: Dean Martin
Did'ja know that this was a hit in the sixties? It's a stroll down memory lane today. Leave the politics behind for awhile.
Well it's lonesome in this old town
Everybody puts me down
I'm a face without a name
Just walking in the rain
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
I got holes in both of my shoes
Well I'm a walking case of the blues
Saw a dollar yesterday
But the wind blew it away
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
I haven't eaten in about a week
I'm so hungry when I walk I squeak
Nobody calls me friend
It's sad the shape I'm in
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
I got a girl waiting there for me
Well at least she said she'd be
I got a home and a big warm bed
And a feather pillow for my head
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Well it's lonesome in this old town
Everybody put me down
I'm a face without a name
Just walking in the rain
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Well it's lonesome in this old town
Everybody puts me down
I'm a face without a name
Just walking in the rain
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
I got holes in both of my shoes
Well I'm a walking case of the blues
Saw a dollar yesterday
But the wind blew it away
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
I haven't eaten in about a week
I'm so hungry when I walk I squeak
Nobody calls me friend
It's sad the shape I'm in
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
I got a girl waiting there for me
Well at least she said she'd be
I got a home and a big warm bed
And a feather pillow for my head
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Well it's lonesome in this old town
Everybody put me down
I'm a face without a name
Just walking in the rain
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Goin' back to Houston, Houston, Houston
Sugar bear
"Can't get enough of that sugar crisp."
Who sang that tune? Dean Martin? Has kind of a Dino ring to it.
Who sang that tune? Dean Martin? Has kind of a Dino ring to it.
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
Why there won't be a civil war: Romney
Originally posted 6.25.18,
Updated 6.27.18:
7:00 am:
Here is the voice of the GOP speaking loud and clear. It is a sign of weakness. Instead of a "minister of death praying for war", we get the type that is being killed mercilessly in the street ( Theo van Gogh), and implores the aggressor "can we talk"?
The author of the piece on Weekly Standard compares conservatives to the Indians on the North American continent. It may seem that way in truth. But this is a country that is armed to the teeth. Yet, it seems to offer no real deterrence to those who wish to take over without firing a shot. Why?
We really are like the Indians. The Indians had no organization. They were defeated piecemeal. The conservatives are just like that. They will not band together and defeat this menace. Instead, what you get is a pleading for restraint, for somebody might get killed--- just as the linked article suggests. Well, despite all of the restraint, it is already happening anyway. Restraint is not working.
If there is going to be a war, why not win it?
6:00 am:
Romney wins primary. Presumably, he will win the general. Now, the question for all these people predicting Civil War 2.0---- if you cannot organize to defeat the likes of Romney, how the hell can you expect to organize for a war?
This should be a wake up call. But everything else should be a wake up call. You war people have had enough wake up calls.
Maybe when they come knocking down your door, you will wake up. By then, it will be too late.
Original post follows below:
Romney is "making a pitch" for the votes of Utah, but he has a strange way of going about it.
What is strange here is that he is accepting all the negatives that Democrats like to use against conservatives and Republicans. Basically, Romney is saying "we're the bad guys, vote for us!" Romney sounds like he is running for the Democrat nomination.
What kind of fool he must think we are that we would listen to this?
If Romney wants to be a Democrat, then fine. Let him join them. But if he is going to act like this, then why does he run for office as a Republican?
Which allows me to segue into why there won't be a civil war. You have to have opposing sides to have a civil war. Romney is like Benedict Arnold leading the Americans against the King of England. Benedict Arnold would have surrendered if he had such authority.
There has to be a will to fight for there to be a war. There is not a sufficient will to fight if you are going to be so agreeable to your adversary.
Update:
Romney is said to have a really big lead over his opponent in the Utah GOP primary. What civil war? With so many GOP'ers committed to surrender politics, how can there be a war?
Update:
Just judging by the response on other webpages, I still say that this is keyboard warrior stuff.
Update:
What I am getting at is that the people who write this stuff are doing for the page clicks.
Updated 6.27.18:
7:00 am:
Here is the voice of the GOP speaking loud and clear. It is a sign of weakness. Instead of a "minister of death praying for war", we get the type that is being killed mercilessly in the street ( Theo van Gogh), and implores the aggressor "can we talk"?
The author of the piece on Weekly Standard compares conservatives to the Indians on the North American continent. It may seem that way in truth. But this is a country that is armed to the teeth. Yet, it seems to offer no real deterrence to those who wish to take over without firing a shot. Why?
We really are like the Indians. The Indians had no organization. They were defeated piecemeal. The conservatives are just like that. They will not band together and defeat this menace. Instead, what you get is a pleading for restraint, for somebody might get killed--- just as the linked article suggests. Well, despite all of the restraint, it is already happening anyway. Restraint is not working.
If there is going to be a war, why not win it?
6:00 am:
Romney wins primary. Presumably, he will win the general. Now, the question for all these people predicting Civil War 2.0---- if you cannot organize to defeat the likes of Romney, how the hell can you expect to organize for a war?
This should be a wake up call. But everything else should be a wake up call. You war people have had enough wake up calls.
Maybe when they come knocking down your door, you will wake up. By then, it will be too late.
Original post follows below:
Romney is "making a pitch" for the votes of Utah, but he has a strange way of going about it.
What is strange here is that he is accepting all the negatives that Democrats like to use against conservatives and Republicans. Basically, Romney is saying "we're the bad guys, vote for us!" Romney sounds like he is running for the Democrat nomination.
What kind of fool he must think we are that we would listen to this?
"I have and will continue to speak out when the president says or does something which is divisive, racist, sexist, anti-immigrant, dishonest or destructive to democratic institutions," Romney wrote.
If Romney wants to be a Democrat, then fine. Let him join them. But if he is going to act like this, then why does he run for office as a Republican?
Which allows me to segue into why there won't be a civil war. You have to have opposing sides to have a civil war. Romney is like Benedict Arnold leading the Americans against the King of England. Benedict Arnold would have surrendered if he had such authority.
There has to be a will to fight for there to be a war. There is not a sufficient will to fight if you are going to be so agreeable to your adversary.
Update:
Romney is said to have a really big lead over his opponent in the Utah GOP primary. What civil war? With so many GOP'ers committed to surrender politics, how can there be a war?
Update:
Just judging by the response on other webpages, I still say that this is keyboard warrior stuff.
Update:
What I am getting at is that the people who write this stuff are doing for the page clicks.
Tuesday, June 26, 2018
And?
John Hawkins says liberals have become insane and dangerous. If he believe that, then what does he propose to do about it???
The question was not asked. Why not?
No, the thing that will happen is that guys like Mitt Romney will win elections, and they will sit back and wonder when somebody will do something.
You can cast about these politicians all you want, but the final analysis may show that it may be up to you alone, because nobody will help you.
If that doesn't change, this will only get worse.
Talking about civil war is silly. Until you have an organized resistance to aggression, this will happen more and more.
The question was not asked. Why not?
No, the thing that will happen is that guys like Mitt Romney will win elections, and they will sit back and wonder when somebody will do something.
You can cast about these politicians all you want, but the final analysis may show that it may be up to you alone, because nobody will help you.
If that doesn't change, this will only get worse.
Talking about civil war is silly. Until you have an organized resistance to aggression, this will happen more and more.
Coal and nuclear energy getting a boost?
Why Trump is going national with bid to save coal, nuclear https://t.co/dygcYPKudG— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) June 26, 2018
comment:
It seems to be negative towards coal and nuclear. Big mistake. Trump has it right, but can he prevail?
Don Surber: Global warming lawsuit tossed
Don Surber: Global warming lawsuit tossed: A federal judge appointed by Clinton tossed the lawsuit filed by a bunch of California municipalities against oil companies. "Judge W...
comment:
Even though the suit was tossed, it wasn't a 100% slam against AGW. The judge doesn't dispute the "science", for example. Instead, it is a global matter, not local, says this judge.
It is more sane, but not good enough. I suppose that is reason enough to be thankful, but also reason enough to be wary.
comment:
Even though the suit was tossed, it wasn't a 100% slam against AGW. The judge doesn't dispute the "science", for example. Instead, it is a global matter, not local, says this judge.
It is more sane, but not good enough. I suppose that is reason enough to be thankful, but also reason enough to be wary.
Mad Maxine: Beyond Thunderdome
Mad Maxine: Beyond Thunderdome: Democrat Maxine Waters, leader of the Congressional Brownshirt Caucus.
comment:
Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are distancing themselves from Mad Maxine. Perhaps pressure should be applied to make Waters accountable for the incitement of mobs. This not American, says Schumer. He should back it up by passing a censure resolution.
comment:
Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are distancing themselves from Mad Maxine. Perhaps pressure should be applied to make Waters accountable for the incitement of mobs. This not American, says Schumer. He should back it up by passing a censure resolution.
Monday, June 25, 2018
Rat binging on cash, dies
It did a perfect bank job, but was ratted out. Tough luck.
Rat breaches bank ATM in India, eats $18,000 worth of cash https://t.co/hNcmJOce8H— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) June 26, 2018
Sunday, June 24, 2018
Trump is Hitler? Liberals don't believe that.
It is something that they make up. Why? Probably because they think it gives them an edge.
If they really believed that Trump was Hitler, they wouldn't favor gun control. Anybody would be a fool to disarm themselves in the face of a rising megalomaniac. Even liberals are not that foolish. Therefore, I don't believe that they believe that Trump is Hitler. It is just a tactic.
If they really believed that Trump was Hitler, they wouldn't favor gun control. Anybody would be a fool to disarm themselves in the face of a rising megalomaniac. Even liberals are not that foolish. Therefore, I don't believe that they believe that Trump is Hitler. It is just a tactic.
Soft Civil War? No. Soft coup? Yes.
This has been ongoing for decades. It has reached the point in which a successful coup may be within reach.
The difference between a coup and a civil war is the difference between battle and a massacre. In order for there to be a war ( and a massacre ), there needs to be significant resistance. That hasn't been happening. Instead, this is a battle between factions for control of the government.
For there to be a war, there has to be a resistance. For an example, look at the Texas Revolution. Prior to the actual war, there were many protest conventions. Therefore, you had significant resistance. It meant that people were willing to organize in force to the threat posed by the government. There is nothing comparable today. Instead, people are organizing by faction for control over the government. People believe that elections will solve this issue. But one of these factions, the GOP, has no real interest in providing significant resistance over the slow creeping soft coup. The Democrats, for their part, do not recognize the existing order, and wish to overthrow it. Thus, the coup.
The Mueller "investigation" is part of the soft coup. If these people can convince enough people to accept the overthrow of a legally elected president, then the coup will be successful. Failing that, there will be an impeachment. If that fails, then there will be massive civil disobedience. You are already seeing that in California, which refuses to cooperate with the federal government. The so called "resistance" is just the beginning of the massive civil disobedience in store for us if they don't get their way. If the Democrats lose, this could turn into something pretty ugly.
Patriots should be preparing for war. Instead, they will passively watch as the Democrats and their GOP enablers allow a soft coup to take place. Without an organized resistance, these people will be emboldened to do whatever they want. If they cannot get it the easy way, they may try the hard way. Weakness only invites the attempt. Until patriots get organized, there will be no war.
But there will be a coup. It is already happening.
Update:
Just to be absolutely blazingly clear --- any talk of a war without the concomitant preparation for one is by definition nonserious. The more you talk about it and the less you prepare, the less serious you appear to be. Anyone who thinks he can "take you", will be emboldend by your weakness.
The difference between a coup and a civil war is the difference between battle and a massacre. In order for there to be a war ( and a massacre ), there needs to be significant resistance. That hasn't been happening. Instead, this is a battle between factions for control of the government.
For there to be a war, there has to be a resistance. For an example, look at the Texas Revolution. Prior to the actual war, there were many protest conventions. Therefore, you had significant resistance. It meant that people were willing to organize in force to the threat posed by the government. There is nothing comparable today. Instead, people are organizing by faction for control over the government. People believe that elections will solve this issue. But one of these factions, the GOP, has no real interest in providing significant resistance over the slow creeping soft coup. The Democrats, for their part, do not recognize the existing order, and wish to overthrow it. Thus, the coup.
The Mueller "investigation" is part of the soft coup. If these people can convince enough people to accept the overthrow of a legally elected president, then the coup will be successful. Failing that, there will be an impeachment. If that fails, then there will be massive civil disobedience. You are already seeing that in California, which refuses to cooperate with the federal government. The so called "resistance" is just the beginning of the massive civil disobedience in store for us if they don't get their way. If the Democrats lose, this could turn into something pretty ugly.
Patriots should be preparing for war. Instead, they will passively watch as the Democrats and their GOP enablers allow a soft coup to take place. Without an organized resistance, these people will be emboldened to do whatever they want. If they cannot get it the easy way, they may try the hard way. Weakness only invites the attempt. Until patriots get organized, there will be no war.
But there will be a coup. It is already happening.
Update:
Just to be absolutely blazingly clear --- any talk of a war without the concomitant preparation for one is by definition nonserious. The more you talk about it and the less you prepare, the less serious you appear to be. Anyone who thinks he can "take you", will be emboldend by your weakness.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)