Comment:
Bongino says don't beat up on Mueller. Instead, think strategically. By that, he means to go after Mueller is to fail to keep the focus on what matters most. What matters most is that the investigation was horrible.
The video is joined at somewhere after 26 minutes. The portion following that is what I consider to be the most important part of this video, hence the embedding begins at that point.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Saturday, July 27, 2019
Card stacking is propaganda
Comment:
... as is name-calling, such as using the name "racist" for everything to soup to nuts. This was once upon a time, frowned upon in America.
This was taught back in school back in the old days of the Cold War. These days, the kids wouldn't know propaganda even it bit them on the backside and said: "we're propaganda, comrade".
Unfair? Perhaps. The sticky issue here is that our society is based on trust. The criminal element preys upon trust and turns it against their targets. The consequence of this is a society that can no longer function properly because trust breaks down due to the crime. It isn't the kid's fault. If they aren't taught, how will they be able to recognize it when it rears its ugly head?
... more from the Ministry of Propaganda
... as is name-calling, such as using the name "racist" for everything to soup to nuts. This was once upon a time, frowned upon in America.
This was taught back in school back in the old days of the Cold War. These days, the kids wouldn't know propaganda even it bit them on the backside and said: "we're propaganda, comrade".
Unfair? Perhaps. The sticky issue here is that our society is based on trust. The criminal element preys upon trust and turns it against their targets. The consequence of this is a society that can no longer function properly because trust breaks down due to the crime. It isn't the kid's fault. If they aren't taught, how will they be able to recognize it when it rears its ugly head?
Washington Post Fact Checks Only Republicans During Mueller Hearings | The Daily Caller https://t.co/JUlRKf7s6z— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 27, 2019
... more from the Ministry of Propaganda
Instapundit » Blog Archive » WHO KNOWS MORE ABOUT DECEPTIVE EDITING THAN THE POLITICAL REPORTERS AT THE WASHINGTON POST? Glenn Ke… https://t.co/iyFZv1JuPI— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 27, 2019
Friday, July 26, 2019
The Gangster Party
Comment:
5:22 pm:
Note how it is only the GOP who recuse themselves.
Nadler is going to press forward with impeachment despite the Mueller fiasco. All for the claimed goal of rule of law.
Daily Update:
7:06 pm:
An embarrassment for anybody with any integrity. A feather in the cap for a committed fraud.
5:22 pm:
Note how it is only the GOP who recuse themselves.
Nadler is going to press forward with impeachment despite the Mueller fiasco. All for the claimed goal of rule of law.
Marc Ruskin: Mueller’s Staff Should Have Recused Themselves From the Russia Probe https://t.co/ZgqKdwkWdl— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 26, 2019
Daily Update:
7:06 pm:
An embarrassment for anybody with any integrity. A feather in the cap for a committed fraud.
We already know of one big omission by Mueller --— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 24, 2019
There are zero citations to Mifsud's 302 in the Special Counsel's Report.
cc @KerriKupecDOJ https://t.co/WcJpQEMntW
GOP forgot to ask about Crowdstrike's claim of hacked emails
Comment:
Saying that they "forgot" may be generous to them. It can make a person suspicious of the whole kit and kaboodle of them, as well as a lot of pundits.
Maybe I ought to mention that I forgot as well. Here I am, praising the GOP for the good job they did, but they failed to do this.
Saying that they "forgot" may be generous to them. It can make a person suspicious of the whole kit and kaboodle of them, as well as a lot of pundits.
Maybe I ought to mention that I forgot as well. Here I am, praising the GOP for the good job they did, but they failed to do this.
The Terrible Truth About Robert Mueller - Diana West and Stefan Molyneuxhttps://t.co/VUEfC7lfk0— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) July 26, 2019
Not going to happen?
What is he even talking about? “Filing an application?” With whom?— Leslie McAdoo Gordon (@McAdooGordon) July 26, 2019
And it’s like they don’t understand words. The DOJ cannot legally provide the grand jury info to Congress under the statute & the case law of the DC federal Court of Appeals. That is 100% not going to happen. https://t.co/gk3MIppNbW
Robby Mook at the 2016 Dem convention
Comment:
I have to confess that I don't get the point of this tweet. It may have something to do with the timeline of events. Maybe it was before the FBI counter-intel operation known as "Crossfire Hurricane" began. I'd have to look that up.
But there's more. It is an eight-minute video. In it, Mook talks about the economy as if it needed improvement. Wait a minute! This was in 2016 and still, this was said during the Obama Administration; but now they say that Trump was supposed to have inherited a great economy. Interesting that Mook didn't refute the need to improve the economy. Trump's performance has indeed improved the economy, yet Mook offered nothing more than what had been offered for the previous eight years.
I have to confess that I don't get the point of this tweet. It may have something to do with the timeline of events. Maybe it was before the FBI counter-intel operation known as "Crossfire Hurricane" began. I'd have to look that up.
But there's more. It is an eight-minute video. In it, Mook talks about the economy as if it needed improvement. Wait a minute! This was in 2016 and still, this was said during the Obama Administration; but now they say that Trump was supposed to have inherited a great economy. Interesting that Mook didn't refute the need to improve the economy. Trump's performance has indeed improved the economy, yet Mook offered nothing more than what had been offered for the previous eight years.
Hey, check out this little gem! It’s Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager on the eve of the Dem convention in 2016, inferring that Putin hacked the DNC in collusion w/Trump. It’s almost like Mook knew that Steele was about to find “proof” of collusion! https://t.co/Pb50lNBo5X— Mike (@Doranimated) July 26, 2019
"Bombshells" all around, but all's quiet on the impeachment front
Comment:
Sic 'em boy, sic 'em.
Sic 'em boy, sic 'em.
Back by popular demand: two years of Russiagate coverage in two minutes | pic.twitter.com/vMekLDO3Kt— Mike (@Doranimated) July 24, 2019
Could have been better.
Comment:
Bongino does a very good job, as the link indicates. With respect to how the GOP did, Bongino thinks they did a very good job shredding Mueller. With all due respect, I think it could have been better. If the GOP reps ceded time back to the Democrats, then they screwed up, IMO. Because there was more to be teased out of Mueller than what occurred.
Not saying that it was a failure of the GOP. But you have got to burn this thing to the ground. You've still got Nancy Pelosi out there asking what Putin has on Trump. Pelosi actually said that, and she said that after discouraging impeachment since regaining the Speaker's gavel. She cannot be allowed to say that and get away with saying that. Which is why I say that a better job could have been done.
The Russian collusion FRAUD must be torched to the very ground.
Bongino does a very good job, as the link indicates. With respect to how the GOP did, Bongino thinks they did a very good job shredding Mueller. With all due respect, I think it could have been better. If the GOP reps ceded time back to the Democrats, then they screwed up, IMO. Because there was more to be teased out of Mueller than what occurred.
Not saying that it was a failure of the GOP. But you have got to burn this thing to the ground. You've still got Nancy Pelosi out there asking what Putin has on Trump. Pelosi actually said that, and she said that after discouraging impeachment since regaining the Speaker's gavel. She cannot be allowed to say that and get away with saying that. Which is why I say that a better job could have been done.
The Russian collusion FRAUD must be torched to the very ground.
The Democrats Are In Tears. The Dan Bongino Show— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 26, 2019
https://t.co/w8Au6mHqJS
Thursday, July 25, 2019
Schiff happened, but mostly just a brain fart
Comment:
Even if you stipulate as true everything that Schiff and Mueller claims, they still had no crime. So why was Mueller necessary?
Even if you stipulate as true everything that Schiff and Mueller claims, they still had no crime. So why was Mueller necessary?
Schiff's interview of Mueller is a series of "yes-no" questions. Even then, he cannot answer all questions, and elaborated on none of them. https://t.co/dWLADRDq6C— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 25, 2019
Spin machine workin' hard
Comment:
The "cucks" and the "soyboys" are spinning the Mueller debacle faster than a spider convention.
For your edification, and in case you are unfamiliar, here's what a soyboy is.
The "cucks" and the "soyboys" are spinning the Mueller debacle faster than a spider convention.
For your edification, and in case you are unfamiliar, here's what a soyboy is.
More on the "cucks" and "soyboys". https://t.co/0uWQsXu8WL— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 25, 2019
Wednesday, July 24, 2019
Mueller time was a "fiasco"
Comment:
"Mueller changed his story." ( 3 times he says?, or was it the third version?)
A fiasco? I think it is a good thing if it leads to the right outcome in next year's election. The wrong outcome, then yes, it was a fiasco for the country.
"Mueller changed his story." ( 3 times he says?, or was it the third version?)
A fiasco? I think it is a good thing if it leads to the right outcome in next year's election. The wrong outcome, then yes, it was a fiasco for the country.
Naked and Afraid?
With this negative review, and with Tribe's, can we say that this figleaf for impeachment has been blown away for good? https://t.co/BUb5rdoObC— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 24, 2019
If not a KO, then what is this?
Comment:
Throwing in the towel? Tribe is pretty liberal.
Throwing in the towel? Tribe is pretty liberal.
The guy who coordinated the hit on Bork knows what’s up. Game recognize Game https://t.co/BTAyN12j0P— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) July 24, 2019
KO in the middle rounds?
Comment:
Mueller at a loss for words. Cannot answer a question. Rep. Ratcliffe of Texas gives him a stern lecture.
Mueller at a loss for words. Cannot answer a question. Rep. Ratcliffe of Texas gives him a stern lecture.
#WhatAJoy when truth is proclaimed!@tedlieu should learn a thing or two; he loves to lecture others on Sunday after he attends his church.https://t.co/l4vWCtJZsf— Lacey Lance (@Asa789) July 24, 2019
Trump's tweets bad for the country?
Comment:
What to make of this tweet from Rasmussen?
Most voters think that Trump's use of social media in order to jump over the Washington press corps is bad for the country, it says. Why would that be? Are the Washington press corps a bunch of sacred cows that cannot ever be questioned nor challenged?
My view, which may be in the minority, is that this is a good thing for the GOP. Getting around the media is a good thing. Reagan often did it with Oval Office addresses. The media is partisan Democrat. Why can't the President get his message out? The media is hostile to the GOP, not just Trunp. This has been true for as long as I can remember.
Indeed, it seems as though there are too many in the ranks of the GOP that have an excessive deference to the media. Hopefully, Trump's use of Twitter can inspire the GOP to find ways to overcome media bias. Media bias is what's bad for the country.
What to make of this tweet from Rasmussen?
Most voters think that Trump's use of social media in order to jump over the Washington press corps is bad for the country, it says. Why would that be? Are the Washington press corps a bunch of sacred cows that cannot ever be questioned nor challenged?
My view, which may be in the minority, is that this is a good thing for the GOP. Getting around the media is a good thing. Reagan often did it with Oval Office addresses. The media is partisan Democrat. Why can't the President get his message out? The media is hostile to the GOP, not just Trunp. This has been true for as long as I can remember.
Indeed, it seems as though there are too many in the ranks of the GOP that have an excessive deference to the media. Hopefully, Trump's use of Twitter can inspire the GOP to find ways to overcome media bias. Media bias is what's bad for the country.
Most voters say #PresidentTrump’s use of #Twitter is the wave of the future, but nearly as many, including a large number of his political opponents, think #Trump’s use of #socialmedia to jump over the Washington press corps is bad for the country... https://t.co/pJQMlMrzxA pic.twitter.com/jHa8Lz3Qrz— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) July 24, 2019
Political boxing match yields more heat than light
Comment:
Left corner!
"AG Barr lied when he said that the OLC opinion did NOT impact decision."
Oh? It seems that they had a meeting before the report was released. So, why isn't it the case that in this meeting, it was discussed, and that it was agreed that the OLC opinion was not a factor. In other words, why isn't Mueller lying?
Is it now a case of who to believe--- Barr or Mueller?
You have to have a stronger case than this than to say Barr is lying.
In any case, exoneration is not an objective. Conviction is. If Mueller could have recommended impeachment and removal from office for obstruction, could he have included that in his report?
This is politics as usual.
and the right corner!
Left corner!
"AG Barr lied when he said that the OLC opinion did NOT impact decision."
Oh? It seems that they had a meeting before the report was released. So, why isn't it the case that in this meeting, it was discussed, and that it was agreed that the OLC opinion was not a factor. In other words, why isn't Mueller lying?
Is it now a case of who to believe--- Barr or Mueller?
You have to have a stronger case than this than to say Barr is lying.
In any case, exoneration is not an objective. Conviction is. If Mueller could have recommended impeachment and removal from office for obstruction, could he have included that in his report?
This is politics as usual.
.@TedLieu: “The reason...that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”— CAP Action (@CAPAction) July 24, 2019
MUELLER: That is correct.
AG Barr lied when he said the OLC opinion did NOT impact Mueller’s decision. #MuellerHearings pic.twitter.com/sOfnsGtdG9
and the right corner!
This 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.co/Z0wNmAkF81— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) July 24, 2019
Clock running out
Comment:
Let's be realistic here. The Mueller team has gotten another scalp as of yesterday. Sydney Powell, who is now the legal representive for Admiral Flynn, says that the conviction won't hold up on appeal. In other words, it is another faulty case brought by Mr. Mueller.
The point being that this is political. If it achieves the political goal, then the legal goal was merely a stepping stone. It leaves the accused with the problem, but the political march goes on the next step. The political march is on the Trump Administration. The legal process is being used as a political weapon, aka "lawfare".
The trial was held in Alexandria, which is near DC. It is undoubtedly a strong point for liberalism, and therefore hostile to the defendant. Contrariwise, it would be difficult to get a conviction in DC against one of their "faves". This is a fact on the ground that cannot be underestimated.
What I am saying here is that the system is rigged in favor of Democrats. The best that can be achieved here is a favorable political result. That result would be if the Democrats LOSE BIG next year's elections. The goal to "lock them up" will have to wait. It may not occur at all if Trump loses. That may be the point of the "lawfare".
Let's be realistic here. The Mueller team has gotten another scalp as of yesterday. Sydney Powell, who is now the legal representive for Admiral Flynn, says that the conviction won't hold up on appeal. In other words, it is another faulty case brought by Mr. Mueller.
The point being that this is political. If it achieves the political goal, then the legal goal was merely a stepping stone. It leaves the accused with the problem, but the political march goes on the next step. The political march is on the Trump Administration. The legal process is being used as a political weapon, aka "lawfare".
The trial was held in Alexandria, which is near DC. It is undoubtedly a strong point for liberalism, and therefore hostile to the defendant. Contrariwise, it would be difficult to get a conviction in DC against one of their "faves". This is a fact on the ground that cannot be underestimated.
What I am saying here is that the system is rigged in favor of Democrats. The best that can be achieved here is a favorable political result. That result would be if the Democrats LOSE BIG next year's elections. The goal to "lock them up" will have to wait. It may not occur at all if Trump loses. That may be the point of the "lawfare".
IG Report Delay, Declassification and Investigative Timeline... https://t.co/XjfKICeITa via @thelastrefuge2— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 24, 2019
Tuesday, July 23, 2019
Bubbles get bigger and bigger until they burst
People in leftist coastal enclaves going insane over global warming | Behind The Black https://t.co/16NwhBppkd— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 23, 2019
Media bias is an old story
Comment:
We've known media bias for a very long time. Question is: "What do you do about it?"
We've known media bias for a very long time. Question is: "What do you do about it?"
always used to say before I went on CNN- watch who the “journalist” anchor interrupts first/most— Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) July 22, 2019
90% of the time it will be the conservative
This is to stack the deck in favor of the lib guest as well as to signal to the audience who the anchor likes/agrees with https://t.co/NaEt9n7AMj
Solomon: Mueller deputy Andrew Weissmann's plea offer to an oligarch...
Comment:
... is this "lawfare tactic" about to take on new significance in Washington DC? Mueller testifies in Congress tomorrow. The boomerangs could fly.
... is this "lawfare tactic" about to take on new significance in Washington DC? Mueller testifies in Congress tomorrow. The boomerangs could fly.
How Mueller deputy Andrew Weissmann's plea offer to an oligarch could boomerang on DOJhttps://t.co/84VNsI7wnR— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) July 22, 2019
Monday, July 22, 2019
Like attracts like, I've heard
Comment:
Who owns the "New York Times"? hint: not an American
Who owns the "New York Times"? hint: not an American
The New York Times remains garbage— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) July 21, 2019
"Bizarre" may be the new "normal"
Comment:
This from people who preach to us about "Democracy" and "Rule of Law", but who honor neither. You know what I mean, Vern?
This from people who preach to us about "Democracy" and "Rule of Law", but who honor neither. You know what I mean, Vern?
Bizarre Status of Flynn Partner Trial – FARA Prosecution in Tenuous Disposition… https://t.co/xbEzTzfIWj pic.twitter.com/h5UmQIJflD— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) July 21, 2019
Housekeeping 7.22.19
Been busy with this kind of activity lately. It may explain the dearth of new material.
At this juncture, I may turn my attention to this blog. The topic "housekeeping" refers to the principle at the general level. Nothing much has changed on the blog. But there may be a few things that will have a different look and feel going forward.
For instance, I am experimenting with fonts and colors. Looking at the appearance of the blog may give me some ideas on improving its appearance.
Let's see some fonts and colors:
Nothing has been decided with respect to the fonts. By the way, as of this writing, I did some rearranging. It is largely self-explanatory.
At this juncture, I may turn my attention to this blog. The topic "housekeeping" refers to the principle at the general level. Nothing much has changed on the blog. But there may be a few things that will have a different look and feel going forward.
For instance, I am experimenting with fonts and colors. Looking at the appearance of the blog may give me some ideas on improving its appearance.
Let's see some fonts and colors:
- Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece was white as snow. Default
- Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece was white as snow. Courier
- Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece was white as snow. Georgia
- Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece was white as snow. Helvetica
- Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece was white as snow. Times
- Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece was white as snow. Trebuchet
- Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece was white as snow. Verdana
Nothing has been decided with respect to the fonts. By the way, as of this writing, I did some rearranging. It is largely self-explanatory.
Sunday, July 21, 2019
It's called "summer"
Comment:
You'd think that the season called "summer" has never happened before. If it gets cold, do they have to ask why to that too?
Nah! It's just more self-serving clap-trap disguised as a serious issue.
You'd think that the season called "summer" has never happened before. If it gets cold, do they have to ask why to that too?
Nah! It's just more self-serving clap-trap disguised as a serious issue.
I read this, thinking it’s simply not possible that it’s really as stupid as the headline implies— Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) July 20, 2019
But oh no, it is https://t.co/zXohaEYOvl
Passive Eloi
Update:
7.21.19:
Yeah, but who's who?
Pointing fingers at the other guy may be satisfying, but does it solve the problem?
Well, it probably doesn"t do anything for the Morlocks.
1.7.12:
Get eaten by the Morlocks!
7.21.19:
Yeah, but who's who?
Pointing fingers at the other guy may be satisfying, but does it solve the problem?
Well, it probably doesn"t do anything for the Morlocks.
Trump the time-traveler confronts the Morlocks and the Eloi https://t.co/k981ZofkeR— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) July 21, 2019
1.7.12:
Get eaten by the Morlocks!
How deep does the rabbit hole go?
Comment:
It's "Alice in Wonderland" in America. Everything is cockeyed and downright weirded out. If this guy is the new normal, it may well explain a lot. At least it seems to be a new normal amongst the liberal persuasion.
The country seems to be turning into the "bar scene in Star Wars".
It's "Alice in Wonderland" in America. Everything is cockeyed and downright weirded out. If this guy is the new normal, it may well explain a lot. At least it seems to be a new normal amongst the liberal persuasion.
The country seems to be turning into the "bar scene in Star Wars".
Key Mueller witness George Nader is indicted on more child sex crime charges, including that he transported a 14-year-old boy to the U.S. for sex. Nader received immunity for much of his testimony in Mueller probe. https://t.co/UziQsSC4AP— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) July 19, 2019
Our emoluments are better than yours
Comment:
Sorry, but I couldn't resist the temptation. I refuse to take the Democrats seriously at this point. The Dems couldn't care a whit about the law, it is all politics all the time.
Sorry, but I couldn't resist the temptation. I refuse to take the Democrats seriously at this point. The Dems couldn't care a whit about the law, it is all politics all the time.
BREAKING: A federal judge Friday has halted congressional Democrats' subpoenas of Trump Organization financial records https://t.co/eu4Atldbfg— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) July 19, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)