The fruits of a faulty ideology

 

  Once upon a time, I got into a fierce argument about the difference between communists and fascists.  My position was that there wasn't much difference between the two.  The argument was about that very thing-- that communists and fascists are opposites is a fallacy, in my opinion.

  Ideology can make you stupid. As true today as always.

  The guy in the embedded tweet has a Nazi tatoo, but also claimed to be a communist.  The conventional thinking is that he cannot possibly be a communist if he has a Nazi tatoo.

  Nonsense. Hitler said that the best Nazis were former commies. There's really not much difference at all between the two ideologies. This is a myth.

Quote: "From this day forward you will never see a headline in the political press referring to Graham Platner, the candidate in question, as a communist, though that’s how he described himself as recently as 2020. " https://t.co/IoDIguv8bz

— Brit Hume (@brithume) February 26, 2026

Jugging: A new name for an old practice. Crime didn't pay this time.

 

  Forewarned is forearmed. Learn about this latest trick up the sleeve of the criminal class, who the commies love so much.

  For his trouble, as his intended victim was literally forearmed, the baddie was shot in the mouth.  But he won't die.  At least, not yet.

  Well done!

  By the way, I know Houston, having lived there for most of my life. This part of town ain't exactly high-rent, know what I mean, Vern?

Link

EV boondoggle

 

A lot has been written about EVs on this page. I don't think I ever favored things such as carbon credits, nor any subsidies for EVs.

In theory, an electric car can be more efficient than an internal combustion engine.

As of this time, no such vehicle has been demonstrated. At least, not to my knowledge.

EV Boondoggle

Commies don't care about pedophilia.

 

Libs outraged over Epstein but just a few years ago they tried normalizing pedophilia.

  Why would this surprise anyone? Why would it ever be in doubt?

  These are the same people who parade perverts in front of kids in schools.

  Plus, you've got a Supreme Court justice who couldn't say what a woman is.

  The left pushed same-sex "marriage" too. Remember???

  Pedophilia is just the next thing in the list, so they really don't give a flip. The outrage is fake.

  By the way, the article mentions that the evidence pointed to was deleted off the internet.  If it weren't for things like the Wayback Machine, or any other capturing device that may exist, you'll never find that evidence.  That's because they'll wipe away the evidence.  Just like Hillary Clinton bleach bitted the evidence against her.

  Liars and frauds, all down the line.  How can anybody be fooled?  How is that even possible?  No one should be fooled, but many will be.

Iran situation

 

  What the heck is going on with Iran, and this imminent war?   Unless hostilities start while I write this, nothing has happened yet.

  If you look about the web, you get all kinds of opinions.  I'm getting the idea here that they don't know any more than anybody else does.  If Trump plays his cards closely enough, only he knows what he will ultimately do.  Everybody else is just guessing.

 So it isn't a matter of speculation here.  I haven't got any idea what he will or won't do.

  What I CAN do is to state what I'd like to see.

  I voted for him on the basis of America First.  So what do we get out of this war, should one occur?

  Well, we might do away with a terrorist sponsoring state.  But you don't need two aircraft carriers for that when you got thousands of nukes and the means to deliver them.

  I wouldn't mind if he sent in the nukes and did away with this country once and for all.

  But nobody has done that, and it wouldn't go down very well.  However, if Iran sank both of our carriers with the help of Chinese tech; that could provide the rationale for exactly that response.  But I wouldn't threaten it.  It would be implied. It is always implied, and that's why Iran wants their own nukes.

  If the USA was ever going to do something like this, it would've been done decades ago.

  Ain't gonna happen.

  If you cannot get that done, and you end up losing two carriers, then what good does it do?

  The same goes with everything else.  In the end, if you do an existential move with a regime that has nukes, it will mean a nuclear exchange.  Who wins that one? NOBODY.

  Unless he gets an idea that nobody else has thought of, and can almost certainly achieve it; I'd say he does nothing at all.  He will hear about it nonstop, of course. But it would only be acknowledging reality.  It's why we cannot do anything about Ukraine.  If we keep pushing that, it will lead to an existential situation for SOMEBODY on the losing side.  Then the nukes could fly.

  China's involvement here has brought this thing into the existential realm.  Now  the question is this:  What benefit can be gained from such a situation?

  I hope he decides against the military move, and withdraws from military and diplomatic entanglements.  Our problems are right here.  It's what I've been saying all along.

  Trump's enemies will attack him no matter what he does, or doesn't do.  There's really nothing for him here.  Unless he can achieve an quick and bloodless coup in Iran.  This bloodless victory is not something I would count on.

Owens v. Kirk

 

 

  There hasn't been much on the brouhaha going on with the widow of Charlie Kirk and one Candace Owens.

  But there wasn't anything about Charlie Kirk here while he was still alive.  Not on my radar.  Not much on Owens either, but there are a few posts about her.

  So I've stayed clear of this too.  Actually, the whole thing doesn't make a helluva lot of sense.  It is a tempest in a teapot.

  One thing that I DID get.  I went to Grokipedia, since I stopped going to Wikipedia, and took a look at some of what that site had to say about Erika Kirk.

  One of my pet peeves came up about "far-right" politics, and that made me feel pretty bad about the state our country is in.

  It is little wonder then, that the political left calls their opponents "fascists" since they (meaning the so-called "right") love to attach that terminology to themselves all the time.

  Folks who claim to be on the right don't have a clue about what they're doing. That includes a whole lot of miscalled thought leaders.  For if you do not know who you are, you have at best a 50-50 chance of winning any fight.  That, according to Sun Tzu on the "Art of War".

  Check out history, and if you do check anything at all, then any association with "right-wing" and conservatism in America should repulse you as much as it does myself.

  If there's anyone in politics that emulates Nazism and Fascism, it is the leftists themselves.  The last thing you'd be if you were a true conservative would be to embrace Fascism.  It is the height of either ignorance or malevolence to believe otherwise.

  People need to get a clue.  You cannot win if you concede the fight before you even start.   Erika Kirk a Nazi?  Puhleeze...

Why the Legacy Media sucks.

Homan tries to make ICE's case, she interrupts him. Finally, she lets him speak. Afterwards, she implies he's withholding information! But she wouldn't let him speak! When he does, she blames him because she wouldn't shut her own trap long enough for him to speak.