Collyfornia's proposed wealth tax highlights their anti-business attitude, and is fostering the out migration to other states. Electorally, it may figure in the outcome of the mid-terms, as voters sour on socialist excesses.
It is a doofus move if it is intended to raise taxes. If you destroy the tax base, then how do you raise tax revenue? The wealth tax would do far worse than just drive people out. It may well drive the state into bankruptcy. How? The question is how do you run an economy if you are forcing people to pay taxes on monies that haven't even received yet, and thereby forcing them into bankruptcy or default for failure to pay this tax?
Another doofus move was to drive out 2 oil refineries in the past year. They did this with their anti-oil attitude. How does it make gasoline more affordable if you don't refine it, and have to have it transported into the state?
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Monday, November 2, 2026
Sunday, November 1, 2026
This is good stuff
The viewership is not where it needs to be. Part of the discussion on YouTube, which is a video over 2 hours long, is about the fall of the culture.
Everybody on the conservative side knows that, yet there hasn't been any effective counter to it as of yet.
The thing that's good about it is that there's some new information that isn't commonly known, that is, if you get inudated with the rotgot culture that surrounds us. The video addresses the culture issue, but that's not really new. What IS new is the approach really does hack at the roots of the problem in the culture, and this is where a turnaround may be in the works.
Now the thing about the culture is that everybody still has a choice. You can participate in the rot, or you can check out of it. When you check out of it, you can check into the solution to the rot. That solution is a word of three letters--- God.
There's not enough time to see all of this video. I've spent about an hour on it, and I think it is quite good.
Everybody on the conservative side knows that, yet there hasn't been any effective counter to it as of yet.
The thing that's good about it is that there's some new information that isn't commonly known, that is, if you get inudated with the rotgot culture that surrounds us. The video addresses the culture issue, but that's not really new. What IS new is the approach really does hack at the roots of the problem in the culture, and this is where a turnaround may be in the works.
Now the thing about the culture is that everybody still has a choice. You can participate in the rot, or you can check out of it. When you check out of it, you can check into the solution to the rot. That solution is a word of three letters--- God.
There's not enough time to see all of this video. I've spent about an hour on it, and I think it is quite good.
An example of stupidity is the UK
And the rest of Europe. There are those who are blaming the USA, and in particular Trump, for their failing economies. This is pure commie BRAVO SIERRA. They've done it to themselves. Trump is attempting to get us out of a bad situation vis-a-vis Europe, Canada, and most of the world. There are those who'd prefer the USA remain on the downslope of a long decline that begin after WWII. It began with the need to rebuild Europe. Europe became a dependency that never really regained their independence. If the EU is an attempt at independence, then go for it. But don't expect USA to foot your bills for you, or to nurse maid you into our own bankruptcy.
Doofus Theory is strongly related to the Stupidity Post of awhile back
The Theory goes that everybody is a doofus at some point. Which means that it is impossible to know everything. The thing that makes you a doofus is the inability or unwillingness to learn from your mistakes.
This theory comes from observation and personal experience.
Secondly, the worst thing is the unwillingness or inability to admit a mistake and correct it. That means you will never learn.
In the context of an election, to vote for a fraud doesn't help you personally, and will cause damage to others. Indeed, to vote for a fraud may get us all killed. I'm referring to the commies. To vote for a fraud may cause the nation to be divided at a time when unity is vitally important.
Let's put this another way. The nation is your home. If somebody burns down your house and you are celebrating it; how does that benefit you? It will cause damages to others, which is the definition of stupidity mentioned in that post. In short, a stupid person causes damages to himself as well as to others. A vote for these people will absolutely be stupid.
This theory comes from observation and personal experience.
Secondly, the worst thing is the unwillingness or inability to admit a mistake and correct it. That means you will never learn.
In the context of an election, to vote for a fraud doesn't help you personally, and will cause damage to others. Indeed, to vote for a fraud may get us all killed. I'm referring to the commies. To vote for a fraud may cause the nation to be divided at a time when unity is vitally important.
Let's put this another way. The nation is your home. If somebody burns down your house and you are celebrating it; how does that benefit you? It will cause damages to others, which is the definition of stupidity mentioned in that post. In short, a stupid person causes damages to himself as well as to others. A vote for these people will absolutely be stupid.
A few election stories
11/01/26:
The only reason to lose to a doofus is to be a bigger doofus. So please avoid it if at all possible.
Keep in mind that the polls are hardly gospel truth. You can go all the way back to the Truman-Dewey race to see that.
The one in 1980 between Carter and Reagan might be the closest pattern to this one---in my opinion. In that one, the polls had it Carter by a hair, or something like that. It was a big, big surprise that Reagan won by a landslide. The polls were way, way off.
The idea may have been to discourage people from going to the polls. This can work, but sometimes, it can backfire. In 1990, Carter screwed up and conceded too soon. That's because the polls weren't closed yet, and it may have affected down ballot races in some western states. That's Carter for you.
Like Carter, the Democrats are just a bunch of doofusses. When they lose, the excuses come running.
The real head scratcher is in Texas. To me, why would a guy like Talarico ever have a chance? But in 2008, Barak Hussein Obama won the Presidency. But he was running against McCain---who might as well have been McLame.
Paxton could've raised more money, but he didn't. Talarico did, and has spent heavily trying to get the GOP vote to flip. Maybe that works, or maybe it backfires---like with Carter. Talarico is really a doofus, and a close examination of his claims will show that. But how many will pay attention to his phony claims and vote for him?
I'm concerned, you bet. But maybe my worries will be overblown. The best thing to do is to go out and vote. Don't let the polls influence you. Study up on the races and choose wisely.
10/31/26:
Things may be getting a bit wild and wooly.Keep in mind that the polls are hardly gospel truth. You can go all the way back to the Truman-Dewey race to see that.
The one in 1980 between Carter and Reagan might be the closest pattern to this one---in my opinion. In that one, the polls had it Carter by a hair, or something like that. It was a big, big surprise that Reagan won by a landslide. The polls were way, way off.
The idea may have been to discourage people from going to the polls. This can work, but sometimes, it can backfire. In 1990, Carter screwed up and conceded too soon. That's because the polls weren't closed yet, and it may have affected down ballot races in some western states. That's Carter for you.
Like Carter, the Democrats are just a bunch of doofusses. When they lose, the excuses come running.
The real head scratcher is in Texas. To me, why would a guy like Talarico ever have a chance? But in 2008, Barak Hussein Obama won the Presidency. But he was running against McCain---who might as well have been McLame.
Paxton could've raised more money, but he didn't. Talarico did, and has spent heavily trying to get the GOP vote to flip. Maybe that works, or maybe it backfires---like with Carter. Talarico is really a doofus, and a close examination of his claims will show that. But how many will pay attention to his phony claims and vote for him?
I'm concerned, you bet. But maybe my worries will be overblown. The best thing to do is to go out and vote. Don't let the polls influence you. Study up on the races and choose wisely.
Saturday, October 31, 2026
Dubya hasn't endorsed Paxton
But a front organization has. Not only that, a bit of a scandal has surfaced?
These days, it is a resume enhancer for theDems commies.
The folks who are supposed to be impressed with Talarico's religious "bonafides" might be somewhat embarrassed, but who knows?
These days, it is a resume enhancer for the
The folks who are supposed to be impressed with Talarico's religious "bonafides" might be somewhat embarrassed, but who knows?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)