Friday, September 4, 2026

Zelenskyy Heading to Canada

This story is really big, in my opinion. I've been watching this for years. The Euroweenies have been trying to pick a fight with Russia for all these years, and I suspect that they want the USA to fight their war for them.

This is what the UK did in World War I and II. Yep, and now they're doing it AGAIN.

I know Russia invaded Ukraine, but it is NOT OUR WAR. Indeed, it isn't the European's war, either. It's not NATO's war. NATO was put into existence to guard against any aggression from the East, not to become aggressive itself. These yo-yos are trying to seize lands that once belonged to Russia, and incorporate it into NATO and the European Union.

And what about this European Union? It is supposed to be an alternative to the USA???

The USA freed the French, saved the UK's ass, even saved Russia's ass from the Nazi's. So, now we go to war with Russia in order to take lands away from what was once a part of Russia??? Are these people INSANE????

I have been against our involvement in this war from the beginning. It is not our war.

Furthermore, this talk about Trump being the next Hitler is monsterous in its mendacity.

I put together a video which shows Hitler's tactics. If anyone's following Hitler's tactics, its NOT TRUMP. It's the European Union. These clowns are accusing Trump of being Hitler, when it is The European Union that's trying to seize territories. Yet, these clowns want the USA to do their fighting for them.

Europe cannot fight the Russians. They know it. So they try to drag America into their stupid war.

Europe is living off the USA's largesse, and then they want to run to China? China is worse than the Soviet Union ever thought about being.

So we in America should fight for Europe because we are in NATO if they provoke Russia into a fight? Can anybody see this but me????

I made a video about Hitler's tactics. It is a LOT LIKE THE DEMOCRAT'S STRATEGY AGAINST TRUMP. IT LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE IT. I put that in Caps for a reason. All of this is related. It is a commie plot.

Hitler was of the LEFT, not the right as we know it. But I've been bitching about this for years. Our "commentariat" cannot let go of this mendacity that Hitler was on the right, and therefore anybody who opposes the DEMOCRATS MUST BE ANOTHER HITLER. Read up on this for cripes sake. Watch my video on my Version 3 blog. It isn't professional quality, but I don't have the time to do a better version of it. But you can be assured that I will hit this hard in the next few days.

These could be desperate times, but nobody may know it or believe it.

That would be a tragedy if it goes by unremarked.

The original post is below:

CTH has a post about what the Canucks and the Euroweenies are up to. If we aren't careful, we will be dragged into the war against Russia. We have NATO commitments, and we (meaning the USA) are obligated to join in if any NATO member is attacked. But what if the Euroweenies get so ridiculous in their attitude towards Russia that they provoke a Russian response?

It would mean WWIII.

Trump should read the riot act to them, and withdraw from NATO---treaty or no treaty. This must stop at once. But in the meantime, we have the specter of WWIII, I cannot help but be amused by the absurdity of the Euroweenies and the Canucks. The Canucks are acting like Dudley Do Right. And pretending the Trump is Snidely Whiplash. But WHO IS PROVOKING WAR HERE???????



CTH: Zelenskyy Heading to Canada



Short but not so sweet post

9/4/26:

I don't recall this at all. Not that it didn't happen, because I'm not going to make up stuff.

As best as I can figure, I must've had some sort of technical difficulty, and it resolved itself rather quickly. So I prompty forgot about thw whole thing. That's all I can say right now without racking my brain trying to remember what this was about.

It's not worth it to me to going on some sort of quest to figure this out. So that's all, folks.



10/22/23: Update from yesterday's post:

An explanation for this glitch yesterday. The system wouldn't let me in, but the password was okay. This set off alarm bells, and I jumped to conclusions, I'm afaid. After backtracking a bit, and with a bit of anxiety, I managed to deduce that Google was making me jump through some hoops in order to determine that I was who I was supposed to be. So, I think I satisfied Google that I wasn't trying to hack myself, so I managed to get things running again. What a relief.

This was written to assure that the unnecessary drama was unnecessary and superfluous. Also too much, too. Know what I mean, Vern?

end update

Update:

2.

Gotta be Google. I have to follow a certain procedure, or it does whack-job things. Or that's the working theory. Anyway, time to carry on.

1.

Something is a bit whacky, but I signed back in okay. Must be some Google thing. For the time-being, I'll continue on as before. Am I worried about hacking? You better bereave it, kid.

 





Things appear to be screwed up. I'm not sure at this point, but the blog may have been hacked. If what happened is what I think, I may not be able to blog on this account again. This may be the final message from me. Until I find out otherwise, then this sign-off could log me out forever.

Don't walk away from communism---RUN.

9/4/26:

Spencer Pratt has something to say about commies that you may want to consider. One thing about commies to keep in mind: They do not tolerate dissent. Musk opposed them. The fact that he did that has them infuriated to the point of murder. The same is true of anyone who opposes them. Their typical response to opposition is hysterical rage, a lot like what Hitler seemed to be like.  That is, according to Hitler himself.  I recall a quote from a book, with a title that escapes me for now.  I may return to this later with that info.  (Rise and Fall of the Third Reich)

Yesterday: The original post is below:

Majority of Voters Concerned With Rise of Socialism, Communism

I would certainly hope so. Bongino said on his show yesterday that we need to do better with the young. It has always been the case that the young are the ones that the predators like to take advantage of. In the case of young people, they have no conception of what they're getting themselves into with this socialism garbage.

It should be mandatory that they spend a lot of time in communist run countries for awhile before they are allowed to vote for commies. It might open their eyes.

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Blue Wave?

Not so fast. At least according to this video.

Culinary type post

9/3/26:

A reaction to a reaction. In the computer biz, this is called recursion.

Or did I forget something again???

It reminds me that I cooked a lot using a microwave... It turns out that I can cook some steak by using the defrost setting on this microwave I'm using now. Run it about 30 minutes or so, and it comes out ok. Just ok??? Hey, I'm not picky. Just lazy. Cooking this way takes little energy from me. It might not even take all that much electric energy. It's low power mostly. It doesn't seem like enough to cook, but I noticed awhile back that it really will cook something if you leave it in there long enough. But what about that tendency to cook around the edges only? Put some water in a clear casserole dish, and the water will heat up and spread out the energy so that it will cook evenly. Worked for me this morning!



6/26/26:

Lot of Word Crimes here, eh?

Maybe food crimes, too... Now, the idea about cooking with the fewest calories is indeed an idea worth considering...

Update a little later...:

I've watched a few gourmets on TeeVee. Here's a video of one that you may enjoy: Justin Wilson. If Louisiana fare is not your thing, well I have another one I watched on PBS: (PBS! Yep.). He went by the moniker of Frugal Gourmet. If were to do gourmet videos, I'd make one thing plain. I'm no gourmet. The name? The Lazy Man "Gourmet". I cook for convenience. It may not be fine cuisine, but it is good enough to eat. Not trying to put on airs here. Just telling it the way it is.

May 3, 2018:

Fancy word for cooking, that is.

Been experimenting with my cooking lately.  Yesterday, I boiled an egg in water.  So what?  Well, the egg was cracked and out of the shell.  It was boiled in water, which is no calories.  The problem with this cooking technique was that the egg stuck on the aluminum foil.  So, I got some Pam, and sprayed it on the aluminum this morning.  Yep.  It worked good.  How was the boiled eggs?  Well, they tasted like, ahem, boiled eggs.

I don't know if that counts as a success.  What was the objective?  To cook without oil, and to use as little energy as possible.  This latter part was achieved by cooking on the lowest possible setting on the propane stove.  A small amount of water did reach boiling point, provided that, you cover the top with foil as well.  This traps all the heat, and allows boiling point to be reached.

The eggs were on for about twenty minutes.  They were fully cooked.

Eggs like this are pretty bland.  How do you fix them up to taste better?  I like cheese on my eggs, so the next time, I will add sharp cheddar to it.

Add some bacon bits, and maybe some tomato, and that's good eating.   At least it is by my standards.


Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Latest Ann Barnhardt interview

9/2/26:

Looks like I've hit something, but hard to say what it IS. Anyway, I wrote a little about religion on this blog. Here's a little more.

For the last several months, or perhaps longer, I've watched a few religious oriented movies on Tubi. There is also something that I discovered on Amazon Prime, called blank-out (forgot it , drat it). Discovering the Apostle Paul, I think it was.

Firstly, about the Video series:

Link to the Discovering Apostle Paul documentary series:

Now, here's an AI generated post on the Apostle Paul:



The Apostle Paul

There was a 1986 TeeVee series on the Apostle Paul shown on Amazon Prime video. So, once again, I get the idea of asking AI. This time, I used the Brave AI, which is Free, as opposed to the GAB AI, which I pay a small monthly fee to access.

Question for Brave AI:

Discuss for me please, the historical and religious figure of the Apostle Paul, originally known as Saul of Tarsus

Answer

Paul the Apostle, originally known as **Saul of Tarsus**, was a pivotal first-century Christian missionary and theologian who transformed Christianity from a Jewish sect into a global faith. Born around **5–10 CE** in **Tarsus, Cilicia** (modern-day Turkey), he was a **Roman citizen** and a devout **Pharisee** trained under the rabbi **Gamaliel** in Jerusalem. Initially a fierce **persecutor** of early Christians, believing the new movement threatened Jewish law, his life changed radically during a visionary encounter with the risen **Jesus** on the road to **Damascus**. This conversion led to his blindness, healing by **Ananias**, and his commissioning as the **Apostle to the Gentiles**.

Paul’s missionary journeys across the **Roman Empire** established key Christian communities in cities such as **Philippi**, **Corinth**, and **Ephesus**. He argued that **Gentile** converts did not need to adhere to strict **Jewish law** (such as circumcision), a stance solidified at the **Jerusalem Council**. This theological shift helped separate Christianity from Judaism and emphasized salvation by **grace through faith**. His **13 epistles** in the New Testament form a significant portion of Christian scripture, addressing core doctrines like justification, the resurrection, and the nature of the **Church** as the body of Christ.

Paul’s legacy extends beyond theology; he is often regarded as the most influential figure in Christianity after **Jesus** himself. His strategic use of **Roman citizenship** to appeal to **Caesar** allowed him to spread the gospel widely and protect his mission. Blending **Greco-Roman rhetoric** with **Jewish scriptural exegesis**, Paul’s writings laid the intellectual foundations for Christian doctrine and influenced Western philosophy and human rights concepts. He is traditionally believed to have been martyred in **Rome** around **64–67 CE**.



Question: Elaborate

Answer: ## The Man Before the Road



Saul of Tarsus was born into a privileged, bilingual world. Tarsus, in modern-day southern Turkey, was a major Greco-Roman intellectual center — a fact Paul himself references in Acts 21:39, where he reminds a Roman tribune that he is "a Jew, born in Tarsus in Cilicia, but brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, instructed strictly according to our father's law." This dual identity — Roman citizen, Hellenistic-educated, and rigorously trained in Jewish Torah — would define his entire ministry. He was also a Pharisee of the sect of the Pharisees (Acts 26:5), meaning he belonged to the most law-observant and politically influential Jewish group of the era.

His occupation was tent-making (Acts 18:3), a modest trade that likely provided financial independence for his later travels. He was present at the stoning of Stephen, the first Christian martyr, "keeping the garments of those who killed him" (Acts 7:58) — a detail that underscores how deeply embedded he was in the apparatus of persecution.

## The Conversion in Detail

The conversion narrative appears three times in Acts (chapters 9, 22, and 26), each with a different audience and emphasis. The core sequence:

- **The encounter:** As Saul traveled to Damascus (roughly 130 miles / 210 km northeast of Jerusalem, a six-day journey) with letters from the Sanhedrin authorizing him to arrest Christians, "a light from heaven flashed around him." He fell to the ground and heard the voice: *"Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?"* When he asked who was speaking, the reply was: *"I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting"* (Acts 9:4–5).

- **The blindness:** Saul was struck blind. His companions, who heard the voice but saw no one, led him by the hand into Damascus.

- **The three days:** In Damascus, on a street called Straight, at the house of a man named Judas, Saul remained blind and fasted for three days — a period of profound spiritual crisis and reorientation.

- **Ananias:** A disciple named Ananias received a vision from Jesus instructing him to go to Saul. Ananias was initially terrified, knowing Saul's reputation. He laid hands on Saul, Saul's sight was restored, he was baptized, and he received the Holy Spirit.

- **The commission:** Jesus told Saul he was chosen "as a witness of what you have seen of me, and I will send you far away to the Gentiles" (Acts 22:15). This commissioning as the **Apostle to the Gentiles** was the single most consequential theological decision in early Christianity.

A scholarly nuance worth noting: some commentators (notably R.C. Lenski) argue that the *conversion* proper — the internal acceptance of the gospel — was completed in Damascus through Ananias's ministry, not on the road itself. The road was the moment of *conviction*; Damascus was the moment of *faith*.

## The Four Missionary Journeys

Paul traveled an estimated **10,000 miles** (16,000 km) by land and sea over roughly 14 years, moving through what is now Turkey, Greece, Syria, and Israel. His journeys are recorded in Acts chapters 13–28.

| Journey | Approx. Dates | Route | Key Events | |---|---|---|---|

| **First** | c. 46–48 CE | Antioch → Cyprus → Pamphylia → Galatia (Pisidian Antioch, Iconium, Lystra, Derbe) | Confrontation with the sorcerer Elymas in Paphos; conversion of the proconsul Sergius Paulus; Paul stoned and left for dead in Lystra |

| **Second** | c. 51–54 CE | Antioch → Galatia → Troas → Macedonia → Achaia (Philippi, Thessalonica, Berea, Athens, Corinth) | The "Macedonian Call" vision at Troas; the first European convert, Lydia, in Philippi; Paul and Silas imprisoned and freed by earthquake; the famous **Areopagus sermon** in Athens; 18 months in Corinth |

| **Third** | c. 53–57 CE | Antioch → Galatia → Phrygia → Ephesus (3 years) → Macedonia → Achaia → Jerusalem | Three years of teaching at the school of Tyrannus in Ephesus; the riot of the silversmiths; final visit to Jerusalem |

| **Fourth** (implied) | c. 60–62 CE | Rome → Spain? | Alluded to in Philemon 22 and 2 Timothy 4:21; the destination "Spain" is speculative |

The **Jerusalem Council** (Acts 15, c. 49 CE) was a watershed: Paul and Barnabas presented the case that Gentile converts did not need to be circumcised or keep the Mosaic law. The council agreed, issuing a decree requiring only abstinence from food polluted by idols, sexual immorality, and blood — a decision that effectively separated the Christian mission from Jewish legal obligation.

## Theology: The Architecture of Paul's Thought

Paul's 13 epistles (the earliest surviving Christian texts, written before any of the Gospels) develop a theological system of extraordinary density. The major pillars:

**Justification by Faith.** This is the backbone of Pauline theology, especially in Romans and Galatians. Paul argues that no one — Jew or Gentile — can be declared righteous before God by keeping the Mosaic law. "A man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ" (Galatians 2:16). His proof text is Genesis 15:6: "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." Abraham was justified by faith *four centuries before* the law was given at Sinai, so the law cannot be the basis of salvation. This doctrine would later become the central slogan of the Protestant Reformation (*sola fide*), though Paul's own context was a dispute with "Judaizers" who insisted Gentile converts must also be circumcised.

**Grace.** Closely tied to justification: "For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast" (Ephesians 2:8–9). Grace (*charis*) is unmerited divine favor — the radical claim that God's acceptance of sinners is not earned but freely given.

**The Church as the Body of Christ.** In 1 Corinthians 12 and Romans 12, Paul develops the metaphor of the Church as a single body with many members, each with different functions but united in one Spirit. This was a revolutionary social vision in a world rigidly stratified by class, gender, and ethnicity: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28).

**The Resurrection.** In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul gives the most extensive early treatment of the resurrection, calling it "the firstfruits" of a general resurrection to come. He even lists the order of appearances of the risen Jesus, making his letter a key historical source for the post-crucifixion events.

**The Law and the Spirit.** Paul does not simply discard the Torah. Rather, he argues the law served as a "tutor" or "guardian" (*paidagōgos*) leading people to Christ (Galatians 3:24). The Spirit fulfills what the law could only point toward: the internal transformation of the heart.

## The Epistles: A Literary and Historical Corpus

The thirteen letters attributed to Paul (Romans, 1–2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1–2 Thessalonians, 1–2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon) were written between roughly 48 and 67 CE, making them the **oldest Christian documents in existence** — predating the earliest Gospels by at least a decade or two. Scholars generally agree that seven of these (Romans, 1–2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon) are authentically Pauline; the remaining six (Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1–2 Timothy, Titus) are debated, with many modern scholars classifying them as "Deutero-Pauline" — written by later followers in his name and style.

The letters were not originally composed as theology textbooks. They were **pastoral correspondence** — responses to specific crises in specific churches. The Galatians were being pressured to adopt circumcision; the Corinthians had factional disputes, sexual immorality, and confusion about resurrection; the Romans were a church Paul had not yet visited but wanted to prepare for his planned mission to Spain. This situational character gives the letters an immediacy and urgency that pure systematic theology rarely achieves.

## Suffering, Imprisonment, and Death

Paul's ministry was marked by relentless hardship. In 2 Corinthians 11:23–27, he gives a staggering résumé: "In labors more abundant, in beatings no less, in deaths often. Five times I received from the Jews the thirty-nine lashes. Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, a night and a day I have been adrift. On the road often, in danger from rivers, in danger from bandits, in danger from my own people, in danger from the Gentiles, in danger in the city, in danger in the wilderness, in danger at sea, in danger from false brothers."

He was imprisoned in Philippi (where the earthquake freed him and Silas), in Caesarea (where he was held for two years under Governor Festus), and in Rome (where he was under house arrest for two years, writing what are called the "Prison Epistles"). Tradition holds that he was executed by beheading in Rome under Nero, around 64–67 CE, likely during the persecution following the Great Fire of Rome in 64 CE. His Roman citizenship would have spared him the crucifixion reserved for non-citizens, making beheading the method of execution.

## Legacy

Paul the Apostle is, by most scholarly and confessional accounts, the single most influential figure in Christianity after Jesus himself. His letters constitute roughly a third of the New Testament. His theological framework — justification by faith, grace, the universality of the gospel, the Church as a trans-ethnic body — shaped every subsequent Christian tradition, from the early Church Fathers through the Reformation to modern evangelicalism. His method of using Roman infrastructure (roads, ports, legal rights) to spread a religious message across the Mediterranean was, in a sense, the first act of global religious communication. And his personal trajectory — from the church's most zealous enemy to its most zealous apostle — remains the paradigmatic narrative of conversion in Western culture, so much so that a "Damascus moment" is now a common idiom for any sudden, transformative change of mind.



9/1/26:

This is one of the most sympathetic posts that I've think I've ever written about anyone. However, I don't believe Barnhardt is any "Paula" Revere. This is absurd. She knocks the American Founding. She's no patriot. I definitely recall that she wrote that the American system has sunk to the bottom like the Titanic. Well, to me that is a bit premature.

She seems to be about one thing, the Catholic Church. I don't find any fault with that, although I'm no Catholic. Nor Jewish. Nor any organized religious denomination.

I DO believe that Jesus is Lord. I think the Lord is badly served.

This blog isn't about religion. I believe the Lord helps those who help themselves. That's a concept that seems alien to all too many people these days. There's way too many who'd rather listen to people who want to destroy us, as opposed to listening to people who want to help. Knowing who is true and who is false is an important thing to know. My "pearl of great price" is the truth. Take that as you will.

12/24/14: The original post follows:

Some of this is very chilling.  She fills in some blanks that I didn't know about.

For instance, she says she wasn't audited until she did her Koran burning video.  In other words, it was a politically motivated audit that occurred before she declared a tax strike.

Another chilling disclosure is that her books were clean, yet they still kept coming after her.  She does say that they came after her after she declared a tax strike.  Even so, what's chilling about it is where is the basis for the IRS to continue to come after her if she has been financially ruined already?  Is it not also politically motivated?  How much money can she owe the IRS if she's already been ruined by their previous audit that found no tax liabilities were due?

She presents herself in such a way, if you find her credible enough, as a modern "Paula" Revere, who is warning us about the advancing oppression of a regime that will crush all opposition and all dissent.  She is, again if you find her credible enough, as someone that the Rush Limbaughs out there pretend to be.  She's taking it on the chin for you so that you can be forewarned, and can do all that you can to defend yourself against what's coming soon for YOU.

Personally, I think her tax strike was a mistake.  Otherwise, she is quite credible to me.  Even a tragic figure.

Think the Rush Limbaughs out there will take her story and push it to the front row and center?  Not a chance.  Rush pretends to be Paul Revere, but Paul Revere risked his neck for the cause of freedom.  Rush won't risk his show, nor his millions for the sake of Ann Barnhardt, who is really doing the job that he pretends to do.

Note on update of 9/2/26:  This video isn't available.  Why not?  I have no idea. 






Tuesday, September 1, 2026

Dan Bongino episode 2585 "Stupid is a choice"

Dan Bongino's show alludes to this phrase in French (Reason for being).

Raison d'être

Pronunciation according to Google Translate: Ree Son Det

The liberals' Raison d'être is to be stuck on stupid, I gather from his show.

What a hoot. I had to post this... It's my Raison d'être. Bwah, hah, hah!