Which would you prefer?

Fear-mongering or optimism?

Separate the wisdom from the foolishness

This video seems like something I've seen before. Ok, a thought just came to me. 'There's nothing new under the sun. All is vanity.'

Does that do anything? Probably nothing good.

Supersonic flight over America's mainland is coming soon

10/9/26:

Here's another innovative idea that could fly soon.

10/4/26: The original post follows below:

"America's Tesla Blows Up The Entire Aviation Market With An Unexpected Announcement"

Aviation pioneer uses weather trick in order to end sonic booms. Planes are now under construction, and the necessary regulatory relief that would allow their flight has been adopted.

Why did it take 50+ years to crack this code? That is what you'd call a "good question".

Incidentally, it is President Trump who signed off on it. Without his signature on the regulations, this plane would be grounded.

Few people are paying attention to this. Comments are sparse and apparently negative. The reason I used this title was its most important news item. But the one the author decided to used makes this look like another Elon Musk project. I've watched most of the video, and I haven't heard Musk's name.

That might be a clue why nobody's watching it. It's getting dismissed a bit easily, I'd say. That's dumb. This plane may make serious money. We'll see.

Whoa! Talarico news!

If this is True, then Talarico is finished...

There was something similiar in the Presidential Election in 1972... That's is what you call a clue...

About that radical abundance

10/9/26:

There was a video that consisted of a Ted talk about this subject of radical abundance. However, the speaker mentioned things like Limits to Growth and Climate Change. That's what you call a contradiction. Radical abundance runs counter to Limits to Growth. In other words, the dude doesn't seem to realize that Radical Abundance can never occur with a mindset that believes in Limits to Growth and Climate Change. He is engaging in double-talk, and he may not even realize it. He seems sincere about his beliefs, so if he is; his talk needs improvement.

Those who push Climate Change are interested in affordability! But they're running on it. Now that is a LIE.

10/19/13: The original post follows below:

If there's one thing that might topple that applecart, it is the powers-that-be.

In my opinion, it's why we don't have cheaper energy.  Look, even the campaign against global warming is a scheme to keep energy prices high.  If you doubt that, then look at the results.  Look at what they want, which is more expensive fuel prices.  The effect that they want is probably the goal that they really have in mind.  Concern about the environment is something that sounds good.  You know, there are two reasons for doing a thing--- one that sounds good and the real one.  This climate change advocacy isn't any different.

The powers-that-be have a vested interest in the current structure.  The current structure will not support radical abundance because you can't make a profit on radical abundance.  Profits require some scarcity.  For example, you cannot sell the air we breathe because it exists in radical abundance.  As soon as clean air becomes scarce, there will be a market for clean air.  Then you can package it and sell it on a market.

It all sounds rather dismal.  Well, economics has been described as the dismal science.  Goods are scarce.  It will always be so.  When it isn't, the market will cease, as there will be no longer a need for one.

President Trump Announces Diesel Supply Agreement with Russian President Vladimir Putin

CTH

Quote:

The USA could be swimming in diesel fuel and yet the price at the pump remains $6/gal.

The USA is exporting it and importing it too (now from Russia). That proves it has nothing to do with Supply and Demand.

The market is rigged, the author adds. That's the point.

UK's war on America

The actual title is "Trump's War on the City of London".

Sometimes a book can be judged by its cover. But this video is really about London's War on the USA---long before Trump arrived on the scene. This goes back 125 years.

So the title of my post doesn't square with the video's title.

I jipped to this bit about Canada's elbows up attitude, and how it squares with London's interests in keeping America under its thumb.