Wednesday, October 28, 2026

For the Midterms, Democrats Hate President Trump’s Stunning Record!

American Thinker: by Joan Swirsky:

Unless Democrats succeed in rigging the upcoming midterm elections, Americans will continue to benefit and prosper from the POTUS’s heroic vision.



Quote:

But their maniacal and clinically irrational hatred of all things Trump and their ongoing abject failure to produce any policies or action plans or even philosophies to counter his juggernaut of all things good and great for America are not worthy of even one single vote in the midterms.


Comment:

Never underestimate the power of stupid. The article also mentions that if the Democrats win, it will be because the public decided to believe in a myth.

In other words, the public will let themselves be deceived. But for what???

Not very smart, but there it is. That is, if you believe the polls.

I'm not into believing myths. I'd prefer to strip away all the phoney tinsel, and get down to the real tinsel.

What would Jesus do?

If you want answers, go to the source... The commies are not the source...

Look up in the New Testament what Jesus had to say about phonies and fakes.... He called them Devils. To their faces. Their response was an effort to stone Him, but He hid Himself in the Temple.

Here it is in the Gospel of John movie. The movie follows the New Testament closely---- jipped to the relevant scene.



We know from the New Testament that what Jesus did in that time. It was probably be the same today. But hearing the commies, they'd say that Jesus wouldn't say this at all.

But the commies really don't want to hear the truth, and the commies want to kill Trump, who says things they don't like. Would Jesus have done this?

A close examination of this video will reveal an answer not convenient to the commies, as they well know. That is why they are trying to usurp the Word.

Democrats now favor oppression and censorship by almost 3 to 1

10/28/26:

A Democrat yard sign around here says that "Democracy is Important". Nothing wrong with that except the fact that Democrats are more for oppression and censorship than for democracy. You can tell communists by the fact that they like to use feel good labels for themselves, but the reality is that they are quite the opposite of what they present themselves as being.

7/27/23:

Behind the Black Blog: Democrats now favor oppression and censorship by almost 3 to 1

Comment:

There has been a shift in opinion, according to this. As recently as 2018, there wasn't any difference between Republicans or Democrats. But now, the Democrats have switched over to favoring censorship by a large margin.

The truth is that the Democrats have ALWAYS been in favor of censorship. But they are open about it now. For example, The late Rush Limbaugh had a TV show, in which he demonstated the attitude of the left. He hid his face behind the dot, as he introduced himself on his first TV show. It was done in humor, but there has always been that component in of the Democrat psyche. They ALWAYS wanted to "flush Rush".

Now that it is all out in the open, what is to be done about it?

A related story:

Study: Democrat Support for Violence to Coerce Members of Congress, Restore Federal Right to Abortion Rises

Comment:

The article also said that there was hope that the Trump indictments would REDUCE his support, but has radicalized Republicans instead. More indictments would mean even further radicalization.

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

The Red-Green Alliance Burning France (Obama, Slotkin and El-Sayed Bring It Home)

There's a lot more at stake in this election than prices at the pump. Barbara Boyd gives the Monday Brief at Promethean Action.

VDH on USA, Russia, China summit



The Euros are in panic mode that Trump will bring peace to Europe.

Chekov checks out

The Captain can't blame it on the Klingons this time.  

Captain Kirk versus Christopher Columbus --- Rap Battle

Yeats, The Second Coming

10/27/26:

If you can believe what you see and hear on the webs, then you may feel that things are very, very wrong.

How to respond? You just do what is in front of you. The rest is in the hands of a higher power.

Why use language like that? Only that there is just so much that any one human being can do. I've done my part. I'm not going to just let it all go. I will do more, but what if that isn't enough to stop the worst?

If the worst comes into being, so be it.

The point is you cannot control events. Events are beyond any one individual. Lots of powerful people are out there trying to influence events their way. Even the powerful cannot stop everything if it is the thing that will be.

What I see is a lot of passion of the ones who may be the worst, but SEEMINGLY less passion from those who could be the best, buy may not be after all. If there's no passion then there can be no good.

6-20-23: Update for post of 4-5-23



The original post included only an embedded video, of which I don't recollect anything. Too bad. That's because the video was taken down, and nothing has been said as to why.

I notice this happening on old posts, and wonder about what's driving this. The idea for making the post was not to promote contention. At least, I don't think so. Nor was it to reflect badly upon the video. Then why would anyone object?

At any rate, I do not like my posts being changed without my knowledge nor understanding about what was objectionable about it.

"https://poets.org/poem/second-coming?mbd=1" is what is left of the embedded html. Either poets dot org objected, or somebody else did. As a consequence, I will repost another video about the poem. As far as I know, there should be no objection to this. Many videos that I embed have been on youtube for a long time. So, it is rather curious that just because I post about it, somebody wants to take it down.

Here's the new video. Let's see what happens to it.