Friday, January 30, 2026

War Stories

  1/30/26:

  You know, the deeper I read into this post, the more painful it is.  Oh, well.

  It says down below, and is a true story; that I wrote software to assist in my trading.  It may be hard to prove, and memories may not be as accurate as I'd wish it to be, but in the sense of the software working or not; I darned near made a fortune off of one attempted trade.

  I put in a limit order for a stock called Broadvision, and I was attempting to buy it at its low in a cycle.  This trade came VERY close to executing, and then took off on a major rally.  You can always say "if", but "if" that one hit, I'd have had a nice little stake to set me up for future trades.

  Did my software help me find the fish that got away?  I'd like to think so.  As for JDS Uniphase, or whatever it was,  I could've bought that one based upon my software.  The trouble is that I waited too long.  Market timing ain't easy, don't ya know.

  Come to think of it, it's more like a casino.

  I'm not too sure that the market is really on the up and up. Well, that's a revelation. /sarc



9/28/25:

As can be seen in the post below this update, once upon a time, I was thinking of marketing my own software. As a matter of fact, I did do that before. It wasn't profitable, so it couldn't last. It would be nice to make some money off those programming skills. Yep, I'm thinking about that as a way to make money. Money-making isn't the goal of this blog anymore. It was in the beginning, but not now.

The blog could be used to practice some html skills. Updating my skill sets and then trying to make money again may be in the cards. But that kind of thing is very time-consuming. It takes a commitment of sorts. For example, I am committed to this blog. If I wanted to scale back on that, I could. I am also commmitted to making something out of my off-grid project. That has been on hold for years now. I still have the land. If I had more money to spend, I could do more on that. Right now, it is out of the question. Hence the idea to make some money.

2/29/24 : Update to Sept 22, 2012 post:

This is interesting in light of what I wrote yesterday about the random walk theory. I'm sure that I had heard about the random walk theory back then, but did not read up on it. I dived into the markets with the idea to beat the markets because I thought I could. My methods didn't work out, but it seemed like I came close. You can only beat the markets if you find an inefficiency in it.  I was using a home grown software package that I also intended to market if it ever worked.   Of course, it didn't.

But what if the markets are rigged? You can get that impression. Indeed, there is crooked shit in the markets, and you can definitely get burned. I know that from first hand experience. Never did a comprehensive tally of my winnings and losses in the markets, but I'd say I lost more money that I gained.

What about the markets today? I am still of the opinion I had when I tried going short in 2009. The markets are bound to crash at some point, but as with all things, it is very, very hard to judge the timing of it.

end update, the original post from 2012 follows directly below:

The stock market is a bit nuts right now, so I'm not in it.  But it may be useful to go back and tell a few of my investments and why some worked and others didn't.  Or, to put it more accurately, why I think it happened the way it did.

I thought about getting into the markets back in 1987.  I talked to a guy about a stock broker job and it seemed like he wanted to hire me, but I got wet feet.  Not too long afterward, the market crashed.  It seemed like a good decision.

By 1998 though, I decided to get in.  Online trading made it easy for anyone and the market was going gangbusters, so I was in.  But I got creamed.  One of the first stocks I tried was Computer Horizons.  This was a Y2K stock, and by 1998, it had seen its better days.  But this was not obvious, at least to me at the time.  But there was a pretty strong hint.  It is called a head and shoulders type chart.  By the time I started trading, I knew what a head and shoulders chart was, and I saw it for Computer Horizons.  The trouble is that I didn't believe it.  So, I invested anyway and got my head handed to me.

To make matters worse, I did what you shouldn't do.  I averaged down.  I knew this was against good practice, but I did it anyway.  It only added to my losses.  Being stubborn when you are wrong only makes matters worse, you know.  You have to be able to admit to yourself when you are wrong.  Did I learn this lesson?  No, because a couple years later, I did it again.

By 2001, the bull market was over and I decided to stay bullish.  Big mistake.  I bought a stock called JDS Uniphase.  As with Computer Horizons, it became obvious that was a loser, but I didn't want to believe it.  So, I averaged down and only added to my losses.  The fate of that stock is hardly any better than Computer Horizons.  While Computer Horizons has gone out of business, the last time I checked, JDS is still kicking.  But that investment would never have paid off.  There are times when I look back and think that it might have if I waited a little longer, but time muddies the waters a bit.  Closer examination showed that it was a loser and the loss could never be regained.

In both of these cases, I really didn't know what I was doing.  That's why I lost so badly.  So, I stopped speculating in stocks and tried some other stuff.  Stock picking ain't my game.  But what game could I play and win?  I tried currency trading and precious metals.  Currency trading didn't work.  There was a reason why it didn't work.  Currency trading is highly leveraged.  If you time it wrong, you can be wiped out and wiped out fast.  It was too hard.  Precious metals did work.  I think it worked because the risk was limited.  Your investment can never be completely wiped out.  It will always retain some value, so if your timing is right, you can make money.  If your timing is wrong, you can get back most of your money.  Yes, and this did work for me.  I regained most of my losses from before, plus a small profit.

Despite all the failures, I wouldn't condemn trading.  There were plenty of opportunities to make a killing, but it didn't happen.  I just ran out of time.

For instance, just before the market started on its last upward blowoff top in 2000, I put in an order for Broadvision.  The order nearly completed when the rally began.  That meant I missed the boat by 3/8, which is about 38 cents per share.  If that order filled, the potential would have been a 20 to 1 return on my investment.  Of course, I would have had to had played it right to get that, but the opportunity was there.  There are many stories like this that I could tell.  But it never did happen.  I had to understand what a blowoff top is and why it was a blowoff top.  I had to understand how doggone hard it is to judge a bottom perfectly and buy at the bottom.   It is also doggone hard to judge a top too.  But this is possible, just not possible to do with great precision.

By 2006, I still wanted to trade stocks so I bought a stock called Altair Nano.  They made batteries intended for automobiles.  But in 2007, things started going south for the economy.  Fortunately, I saw and remembered that you don't want to be long in the markets when the economy tanked.  I sold and went short the entire market.  That play worked like gangbusters.

Going short is high risk though.  It worked for me because I was right.  But if you're wrong, your losses can be unlimited.

By 2009, I was absolutely convinced that current economic policy was nuts.  I tried going short, but I got my butt kicked.  I've been out ever since.  Sure, I could have gone long and made big bucks, but I have no confidence in the markets.  For I've learned that when the market turns against you, losses can mount very fast.  I wouldn't touch these markets with a ten foot pole.

That's a short history of my doings in the market.  Basically, it all boils down to learning from the school of hard knocks.  You learn what works and what doesn't.  Besides that, you learn about yourself.  For example, some people can tolerate risk better.  I'm not one of those people.  A high risk play is probably not for me.  You have to know these things if you want to have any hope of success.  Another thing is that you can make plenty of money if you are right.  Likewise you can lose your butt if you are wrong.  So you better be right.  The opportunities are there as long as the market is sane and working properly.  I don't think it is right now.


New idea: Quick take on the news.

The rationale behind the idea.



 

  There's so much going on, and there's so many "irons in the fire", so to speak. It's a time management thing. So, with that thought in mind, here goes:

QUICK TAKES ON THE NEWS:

  Fake news on the rise again?   Trump up among Latinos?   Mixed messages on this one.   There's folks saying the immigration issue may cost the midterms because of the Latino vote.  Then, there's this poll that says Trump's polls among Latinos is way up.  The Latino polls are all over the map.  So what's the real story? In my opinion, long established Latinos will respond well to Trump.  It may well be the case that Latinos are probably pretty well split based upon how long they've been here.  It's probably more accurate to figure on self-interest.  Since the newcomers have to compete with the established residents, that leaves you with the answer as to why they'd split on their votes.

Government Shutdown Avoided?

Looks like a deal has been struck to prevent a government shutdown.

  What's with this inordinate fear of government shutdowns?  This latest deal between Schumer and Trump looks like a cave-in.  Why would you sacrifice anything to the Democrats over their shutdown antics?  It just doesn't make sense. This isn't hurting Trump.  Heck, it may well be helping him.  Why give in to the Democrats over THIS???



Info-ops and controlled opposition

Note: No links for the following semi-rant:

  I'm noticing quite a bit of negativism on some of the "right-wing" sites. I suspect ALL media. This looks like a subtle, very subtle info-op.

  Examples: CFP has some anti-Trump links. What gives with that?  I count more than one.  One on trade deficits.  Another on border policies and the mid-terms. Another one about the border wall.

  What about all these "spokesmen" for MAGA, like Tucker Carlson, MTG, et al. --They don't speak for MAGA.  They don't speak for anyone, except perhaps their followers.  I don't particularly give a flip about Tucker Carlson and a few others of these people who seem to get their names in the news.  Just because the talking heads in the news doesn't have to mean that you check your brain in at the door.  If you're really MAGA, then you should think for yourselves.



Joy Reid Strikes Again

  This link is about something to the effect that all MAGA people are racist.  My point is that you don't have to be all-consumed with race to be MAGA.  MAGA isn't about race, as I understand it.  Therefore, the accusation is projection; either of the subconscious kind, or the conscious kind.

  The subconscious kind is pathological.  In other words, CRAZY.  Just because you believe in merit, it doesn't make you a racist.  Communists don't believe in merit.  Unless of course, if their idea of "merit" is how loyal you are to the party. Commies can turn their positions on a dime.  Which means that they really don't believe in what they're saying at the time they're saying it.  In that case, it is the conscious kind of projection.  The kind that uses slander as an offensive weapon in order to keep an opponent off-balance.  Either way, it is bad.  It means that either you are a liar, or a sicko.

Thursday, January 29, 2026

Tom Homan reports





Wednesday, January 28, 2026

"Stupid is what stupid does", says the sage

  We can do without Europe. But Europe cannot do without us.

  But some folks seem to think that Europe is some kind of sacred cow.

  It bears repeating, what the hell has Europe done for us?



A color revolution could be coming to a country near you

  Here's a twitter embed. It looks like a lot of posts out there about this Minnesota thing.

  Is it really just peaceful protest, or is it something more organized and determined?  In other words, an insurgency.  Who's behind it?  An internal enemy, or an external one?

  An insurgency that could grow into a color revolution.





Cam Higby

 Perhaps you've heard of this person's work.  Here's a video which discusses the situation in Minnesota.

The video is quite long, and it's late.  I watched about 20 minutes of it.   



Updated next morning:

Here's the embedded video. Must've been punch drunk last night. Didn't see the embed code option. There was one point at approximately the 48 minute mark. Of all the violent incidents with ICE, 63% of them have been in 9 sanctuary counties. These are isolated incidents that activists want "good trouble" (Tampon Tim's words) in order to drive news cycles.



Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Some DHS agents speak up

  As I've written before, I reserve judgement on this until I've seen what actually happened. The tapes I've seen so far do not convince me one way or the other. There's supposed to be on-body cameras that may have caught some definitive information that can settle this one way or the other.

  If it turns out that some agents acted inappropriately, then whatever the appropriate disciplinary action that should apply by all means. There should be accountability for all concerned, INCLUDING ALL PEOPLE WHO DO NOT OBSERVE THE LAW.

  Even if some agents acted badly, that's no excuse for giving up. Puhleeze.

  Does anarchy win just because somebody who's supposed to uphold the law screws up?

  Once again, not saying that that is what happened.



ICE Unloads by Ken Klippenstein

Immigration officers speak out: “Fuck this.”

Read on Substack

A famous person once said something to the effect that: "Government isn't the solution, government is the problem."

  Everywhere you look, it seems that the Democrats are leading with a glass jaw. The riots in Minnesota?  The Dems side with the criminal element, while inciting protests that interfere with deportations of the same.  Also, the Dems want to run on "affordability".

  If Dems policies are so affordable, then why is the bluest state--California, so expensive?

  Then there's this tweet.  That's what reminded me of Reagan. Well, the Democrats are the party of government, and the government, as this tweet shows, has a heavy hand in those parts of the economy in which they control.

  The Republicans can't beat this???

  Time to clean house in the GOP party if they won't do anything to counter the nonsense coming from the Dems.   Primaries start soon!  They start early here in Texas.  Maybe as early as next month, you can vote some of the these bums out.





Monday, January 26, 2026

Why Trump mustn't stop enforcing Immigration Law in Minnesota

  He may not be doing what some are fearing that he is doing.  However, if he is, it's going to be a big mistake.

  Here's an article which shows where the real problem is, and it isn't with ICE.

  The squeaky wheel gets the grease, the old saw says.  The left is making a lot of noise, and may get their way because of it.  If this does indeed happen, it is because of the continuance of giving in to them.

  Now the left wants to do a shutdown over this.  You know, the GOP isn't exactly getting rave reviews over its wobbly legs in the budget agreement as is.  If the left tries to push their luck, maybe the GOP ought to re-visit the entire funding situation.  That's the second part of the problem.  Too many squishes.





Link

The recent shooting in Minnesota

  There are no links that go with this post. But that doesn't mean I haven't watched some videos of what happened.

  This may be one of those situations that may require a lot of close study in order to come to a conclusion about anything.

  One thing that has grabbed me a bit after reading a lefty blog, which had the usual "murder" accusations against the ICE officers.  From what I can see of the videos, it isn't cut and dried, either way.

  A caveat is in order.  I haven't watched and studied this to the greatest possible extent.  I'll just comment on one thing: I think that the left WANTS there to be incidents like this so that they can use it.

  But was there any excessive use of force?  From what I can see, I cannot tell.

  The left doesn't want anybody to look at this guy's associations.  It appears that he is part of a network of people who have dedicated themselves to harassing and interfering with law enforcement.  There's no way that this can be condoned. Indeed, if the guy had followed the law closely, the situation could have been avoided.  If the local authorities were more cooperative, this could have been avoided.  You could list the number of mistakes this guy made, but for some reason, a law enforcement officer is expected to be absolutely perfect.

  Bias can creep in.  I am more in favor of immigration laws being enforced.  It is quite clear that the political left wants it to stop.  You could fall on either side of that bias.

  This is not cause for ICE to be pulled back out of there.  That would be a big mistake.  I don't think that additional training is going to make any difference.  It would seem that they should be more cooperative about law enforcement, as opposed to agents not being trained well enough.  But if they want more training, then provide the funds.  But they probably want to deny the funding.

  Anyway, all of this could've been predicted.  There are those who want bad things to happen.  That so that they could use it for political goals.



Quick update:

Ok, I found a link that can go with it. Also, I will try to embed. But these embeds don't always work. Folks may not like to have their pages embedded in another page. Ok. So, here we go.




Link

Mob rule in Minnesota

  A fire chief has said that the mob rules.

  It may be argued that he is only stating the obvious.  Even so, there should not be a public statement without a condemnation of such mob rule.

  (The article embedded may have to be pulled down, but while it is up, you can view it here.   But the link will remain, so if it is pulled down, you can still link to it.)

  The article says that any justification of this is the same argument that the slave states made prior to the Civil War.

  Basically, Minnesota is claiming the right to the "heckler's veto", or nullification of Federal law by a state.

  History has shown that this will not hold.  Texas VOTED to secede.  Lincoln said no.

  That is, if the President of the time allows it.  Lincoln didn't.



It won't embed.



Link

Sunday, January 25, 2026

There is so much wrong here that something has to be done

  If the Legacy Media won't report the truth, and that results in serious civil disturbance, could that not be grounds for revoking their license to broadcast?

There is a First Amendment, but that doesn't include the right to incitement.

The various media outlets have a duty to serve the public interest. How is this in the public interest?





Mr. Plow

  Hey, Mr. Plow!

  I'm all snowed in! Can you help me, Mr. Plow?

  Psst! I'm not your Grand Pa, even if I look like him.





Marcus House's Starship, et al -- Update 1/25/26

  Author: Marcus House

Description: "SpaceX is kicking off a massive new construction phase at Starbase, with clear signs of major site expansion now underway. "

This one will go into the database.

BTW, I rode out the ice storm, and none the worse for it.

Now for digging out of all this friggin' ice.