Trump "saved" Indiana in 2016, says Surber.
Whatever Trump did, it's a good thing that he did. Otherwise, it would've been Horrible Hillary.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Saturday, May 9, 2026
Democrats not sending their best?
The Dems lambasted former Veep Dan Quayle with the way he spelled "tomato". Or was it "tomatoe"? Anyway, Quayle wasn't trying to argue before the Supreme Court. It says here that the petition didn't get the spelling of the state right. How DO you spell Virginia? Maybe I need to go back to school meself.
They filed an appeal to a court that clearly lacks jurisdiction and couldn’t even spellcheck beforehand.
— AG (@AGHamilton29) May 9, 2026
Same geniuses that argued the court couldn’t rule before the referendum only to then complain that they wasted $70 million on a referendum that did not count. https://t.co/AJrMTgM5Qf
Kudlow discusses economic news
"Lefties will be disappointed." Doomers and gloomers will have nothing to talk about. Maybe they'll invent something, eh?
Friday, May 8, 2026
The jab was never a vaccine, and it shouldn't be a revelation that it wasn't.
5/8/26:
For the upteenth time, the "vaccine" wasn't a vaccine. Toldja.
8/26/25:
For the upteenth time, the "vaccine" wasn't a vaccine. Toldja.
Senator Ron Johnson is correct — COVID-19 mRNA "vaccines" are NOT vaccines.
— Nicolas Hulscher, MPH (@NicHulscher) May 6, 2026
They are synthetic gene-transfer platforms that hijack vital organs to mass-produce lethal, non-human proteins.
Here’s how they really work 👇 https://t.co/n3zSOQXpGT pic.twitter.com/6yzOVMMEs2
8/26/25:
I bitched and bitched and bitched about it at the time. The vaccine was NEVER a vaccine and NEVER should have been called one. But it was. Now it is a revelation to some that it wasn't?
Somebody left the cake out in the rain...
5/8/26:
Feds take back McArthur Park. Pinkos are unhappy about that. Trump should declare Collyfornia a disaster area and take it over. Nueva Jork tambien, senor.
7/8/25:
LA mayor Karen Bass is worried about gangs making a living. They don't bake cakes there... What's she really worried about, eh?
Feds take back McArthur Park. Pinkos are unhappy about that. Trump should declare Collyfornia a disaster area and take it over. Nueva Jork tambien, senor.
7/8/25:
LA mayor Karen Bass is worried about gangs making a living. They don't bake cakes there... What's she really worried about, eh?
Remember the Time LA Mayor Karen Bass Barged Into MacArthur Park and Ordered the MS-13 to Leave? https://t.co/3SaUYnfBx9 --- Wow, the so-called "racist" Trump actually cares about McArthur Park. It's only full of gangs and such. Why can't Trump leaves the gangs alone???
— BootsandOil (@BootsandO6892) July 8, 2025
A very strong "no" with regard to immigration
Here's another one I want to pay more attention to: Crowder.
Open borders people are stupid. There's no nice way of putting it. If you have anything at all, it will be taken from you if you keep up with this nonsense. There will be no more country, and everything you take for granted will be off the table. That includes your property rights. Unlimited immigration in favor of socialism and communism will put the hurt on you at some point in the future. Please stop this stupidity.
Thursday, May 7, 2026
Trump hatred--- what is it? What can be done about it?
Trump's war on Iran... Opening the Strait or Hormuz...
Does the opposition to Trump actually know why they oppose him???
Maybe they like seeing stuff like this instead..
Dem's plan for destroying America ( or anybody like Trump who defends it )
Does the opposition to Trump actually know why they oppose him???
Maybe they like seeing stuff like this instead..
Dem's plan for destroying America ( or anybody like Trump who defends it )
TimCast on Rumble --- talks security and its costs
The security part was the first segment. Maybe 25 minutes or so. Then he launches into this woman who got evicted. She was in Minnesota, where they got all that Somali fraud. She's on MediCaid, and she needs help from the government.
The government doesn't police the fraud, and she ends up on the street.
If Tim Pool cannot show these stories, people may not see and want to do something about it.
If nothing gets done, THE PEOPLE WHO THE DEMOCRATS ARE SUPPOSED TO CARE ABOUT SO MUCH, WON'T GET THE HELP THEY NEED.
Are you friggin' paying attention James Carville? James Carville and that bunch don't give a shit about YOU, OR ME; or anyone else but their own horrible selves. That's why shit like this happens.
Tim Pool runs a story on local TV. It isn't right wing propaganda, folks. It's a real story. The violent left wing doesn't want you to see it though. That's why Tim Pool is so concerned about SECURITY. He doesn't want to get Charlie Kirked.
Over and out.
The government doesn't police the fraud, and she ends up on the street.
If Tim Pool cannot show these stories, people may not see and want to do something about it.
If nothing gets done, THE PEOPLE WHO THE DEMOCRATS ARE SUPPOSED TO CARE ABOUT SO MUCH, WON'T GET THE HELP THEY NEED.
Are you friggin' paying attention James Carville? James Carville and that bunch don't give a shit about YOU, OR ME; or anyone else but their own horrible selves. That's why shit like this happens.
Tim Pool runs a story on local TV. It isn't right wing propaganda, folks. It's a real story. The violent left wing doesn't want you to see it though. That's why Tim Pool is so concerned about SECURITY. He doesn't want to get Charlie Kirked.
Over and out.
The Obama "Retcon"
Dan Bongino debunks Obama's claim of innocence about the weaponization of the DOJ. The mindless clapping seals lap it all up.
Collyfornia is retarded
They vote for Democrats and they get crap. When it comes time to do something about that, they still vote for Democrats. The commies say that the election is rigged. Yep, and the commies are the main riggers.
As Einstein once said, the mind that caused the problem is not the mind that can fix it.
As Einstein once said, the mind that caused the problem is not the mind that can fix it.
Call a thing by its right name
5/7/26:
So screwTube took down the video embedded on this post. It violated their terms of service, they say.
Maybe it is the mushroom treatment. If somebody shows the truth, this is dangerous to somebody. So ScrewTube takes it down.
If it is a war, then who are the combatants? If you're a commie, the "rich" is the enemy. Actually, if it IS a war, that last post shows who is getting screwed, and who is benefitting from the screwing. Whatever that is, it isn't just.
People lose their homes in LA from a fire that looks like it might have been arson; and what does the government do? It punishes the people who were burned out. Also, the money goes to the people who are favored. What did those people who lost their homes do to deserve anything like THIS?
2/2/19:
If it isn't a war, then what is it?
There is a phenomenon here, no doubt. There are some who disagree with what is happening to our culture. But using the word "war" in order to describe it , is inaccurate.
If you are going to be a wordsmith, then use words correctly.
Consequently, what is this phenomenon?
I have a few suggestions. One is coup. Another that might be considered is a mugging. A third that might be more evocative, and yes, descriptive ---- RAPE.
Yep. You can see how a RAPE would describe it. Violence or threat of violence in order to dominate and force to submit to what would not be done willingly.
If you wanted an emotional response to your words, then try using the word -- RAPE --- in order to describe it. It is utterly one sided, and it can become brutal. This would be the case regardless if you said something in protest to it or not.
EEEEEE! Aw. Don't make a fuss. Just sit back and enjoy it. Hmmm?
So screwTube took down the video embedded on this post. It violated their terms of service, they say.
Maybe it is the mushroom treatment. If somebody shows the truth, this is dangerous to somebody. So ScrewTube takes it down.
If it is a war, then who are the combatants? If you're a commie, the "rich" is the enemy. Actually, if it IS a war, that last post shows who is getting screwed, and who is benefitting from the screwing. Whatever that is, it isn't just.
People lose their homes in LA from a fire that looks like it might have been arson; and what does the government do? It punishes the people who were burned out. Also, the money goes to the people who are favored. What did those people who lost their homes do to deserve anything like THIS?
2/2/19:
If it isn't a war, then what is it?
There is a phenomenon here, no doubt. There are some who disagree with what is happening to our culture. But using the word "war" in order to describe it , is inaccurate.
If you are going to be a wordsmith, then use words correctly.
Consequently, what is this phenomenon?
I have a few suggestions. One is coup. Another that might be considered is a mugging. A third that might be more evocative, and yes, descriptive ---- RAPE.
Yep. You can see how a RAPE would describe it. Violence or threat of violence in order to dominate and force to submit to what would not be done willingly.
If you wanted an emotional response to your words, then try using the word -- RAPE --- in order to describe it. It is utterly one sided, and it can become brutal. This would be the case regardless if you said something in protest to it or not.
EEEEEE! Aw. Don't make a fuss. Just sit back and enjoy it. Hmmm?
LA fire benefit concert funds go to non-profits---not to victims
Update:
It seems that these far-left outfits were well-represented already. These non-profits got the money, not the victims of the fire. The far-left groups are just troublemakers. The money is going to the wrong places and to the wrong people. The commies have got their own hands on the money. The money is going to THEM.
You gotta be sheeting me, main! None of this money went to the folks who lost their homes in the fire? What the f**k?
You gotta be sheeting me, main! None of this money went to the folks who lost their homes in the fire? What the f**k?
California Rep Kevin Kiley says they have learned the $100 million dollar pacific palisades Fire Aid concert money was laundered to nonprofits
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 6, 2026
“What we have learned is absolutely beyond belief — Tens of thousands of people donated raising a hundred million dollars for what they… pic.twitter.com/7vBGCaVeui
Wednesday, May 6, 2026
Viral ad in LA Mayor's race
This guy brings some passion into the mix. You need that in order to get some traction. Democrats are so arrogant that they don't think that they'll ever face any political accountability. Maybe this will get some attention and get people to give a shit.
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
Top 20 Greatest Live Music Moments in History
Somehow I ended up at this site. Maybe it is not the best thing to embed.
There were a number of videos that showed how to play the piano. I've got a keyboard, so maybe this is a possibility?
Modern culture sucks. That includes the music. But there's still some good things.
There were a number of videos that showed how to play the piano. I've got a keyboard, so maybe this is a possibility?
Modern culture sucks. That includes the music. But there's still some good things.
Animal farm remake BOMBS at theaters
Tim Pool
If communism is the answer, what's the friggin' question? The answer is a set of inviolable standards. Communism cannot deliver this because there are no standards in communism. Indeed, quite the opposite. Standards come from morality, which comes from God. There's no God in communism.
If communism is the answer, what's the friggin' question? The answer is a set of inviolable standards. Communism cannot deliver this because there are no standards in communism. Indeed, quite the opposite. Standards come from morality, which comes from God. There's no God in communism.
This is what we thought we left behind in 2024
Surely, we really wouldn't want to go back to this, would we?
Ace of Spades: "Swallwell" sent sexually explicit photos of himself to women.
This dude was running for POTUS not that long ago. Oh, and the Democrats want to run on Epstein. Democrats are the party of perverts.
Also from Ace:
Destruction of our legal system. Lawfare. Endless war of all against all. This is leftism. Destruction of private property rights. Stunted Freedom of speech. No Freedom from the surveillance state. Unlimited immigration. Giving jobs to foreigners, shunning Americans. All of this proceeds from leftism. Why go back to that?
ABA losing its monopoly on Law School Accreditation
Ace of Spades: "Swallwell" sent sexually explicit photos of himself to women.
This dude was running for POTUS not that long ago. Oh, and the Democrats want to run on Epstein. Democrats are the party of perverts.
Also from Ace:
Destruction of our legal system. Lawfare. Endless war of all against all. This is leftism. Destruction of private property rights. Stunted Freedom of speech. No Freedom from the surveillance state. Unlimited immigration. Giving jobs to foreigners, shunning Americans. All of this proceeds from leftism. Why go back to that?
ABA losing its monopoly on Law School Accreditation
The so-called "political spectrum" is a fairy tale
No real difference between Nazism and Communism.
The link between Nazism and Socialism used to be well-understood. This is from a widely circulated newspaper column in 1937: https://t.co/1LrCzJYwRT pic.twitter.com/Nwy2YAUUNS
— Phil Magness (@PhilWMagness) May 4, 2026
Will Alberta leave Canada?
The bigger question is this: will the commie pinkos allow Alberta to leave?
Carney is looking more and more like a major disaster.
Maybe Alberta needs to stop asking and just do it. Like the song says.
Maybe Alberta needs to stop asking and just do it. Like the song says.
Tim Pool's TimCast
Black dude loses it over Scotus ruling
Comment:
Gonna follow Tim Pool a bit more. Interesting things to say.
Comment:
Gonna follow Tim Pool a bit more. Interesting things to say.
Monday, May 4, 2026
Microsoft sucks
5/4/26:
In the process of an upgrade. More geeking out, as I've moved on to a new Raspberry Pi machine. I've paired it with a tiny screen, though. It is only 7.1 inch diagonal, and reading it is not easy.
The change was made because there was a blank screen from the older machine. For some reason, the monitor would no longer display. It was acting like there was a loose connection somewhere, so I just got a new machine. More than one reason for a new machine. The old one was a minimalist system. This one has more memory, and therefore more power. We'll see.
It turns out that the old machine still works. There's also a tiny screen for it too. So now I have two Raspberry Pi machines.
All of this in order to get away from Microsoft.
3/20/26:
Microsoft just bricked the machine in this video. He fixes the problem, and it tries to do it again! Avoid Microsoft...
11/23/25:
In the process of an upgrade. More geeking out, as I've moved on to a new Raspberry Pi machine. I've paired it with a tiny screen, though. It is only 7.1 inch diagonal, and reading it is not easy.
The change was made because there was a blank screen from the older machine. For some reason, the monitor would no longer display. It was acting like there was a loose connection somewhere, so I just got a new machine. More than one reason for a new machine. The old one was a minimalist system. This one has more memory, and therefore more power. We'll see.
It turns out that the old machine still works. There's also a tiny screen for it too. So now I have two Raspberry Pi machines.
All of this in order to get away from Microsoft.
3/20/26:
Microsoft just bricked the machine in this video. He fixes the problem, and it tries to do it again! Avoid Microsoft...
11/23/25:
A problem has arisen.
There may be some who would think that I am being too hasty in my judgement. Let me state what has happened. Then we'll go from there.
I have two computers. One of them is a netbook, the other is this one--a raspberry pi. Linux is preferred because Microsoft has gone rogue, as far as I'm concerned. They are WAY too nosy with their data collection. It's over the top, and so I switched to Linux in the last several months. Since that switch, I've had Linux go out on me three times. The first two times, I figured that it was Linux to blame, but this time, it HAS to be Microsoft.
The bios was messed with. Who could do that but Microsoft? Microsoft shares the netbook with Linux. Linux isn't on the main drive, though. However, when you boot up, some of the boot code is accessible to Microsoft. Well, the bios won't load up the Linux now, and redirects you back to Microsoft.
Could some hacker do this? Maybe. What makes me suspicious in this case is something I saw on a YouTube that says Microsoft tries to bump off any Linux installations if there are operating on the same machine. When I saw this, I realized that somehow the netbook allows the possibility of interference by our good, good friends--Microsoft. Anybody, all three failures could very well have been Microsoft refusing to play nice with Linux.
If Microsoft is innocent here, then it was hackers. But why would hacker direct me back to Microsoft? Only if the hacker is with Microsoft, and Microsoft is actually the hacker. Or they paying hackers to sabotage Linux installations.
At this point, the damage is minimal. I don't know how to recover from this, but I might be able to. Not sure what I need to do though. It is a pain in the ass.
The Big Tech companies, like Microsoft, are out of control. They need to be reined in. This ought to be an anti-trust issue right here. They got no business interfering with people's computers. They don't own this damned machine. They didn't give it to me. It isn't their property. I'M NOT THEIR PROPERTY EITHER.
Sunday, May 3, 2026
5 Signs of a Radical Change in U.S. Politics
5/3/26:
The attention may be on Trump now, but Obama was POTUS when this post was written. The left may only be interested in political situations that run against them. If anything is radicalized, it is the Democrat party. Obama associated with communists, after all. Nazis were defeated decades ago.
6/26/12:
The Atlantic
This seemed like pure projection to me, but as the Supreme Court has shown, the projection and denial is going all round.
I read this yesterday, and Glenn Reynolds posted his reactions to this piece. One reaction was to be "unimpressed".
The major aspect of projection is that it denies something that is within oneself.
Plain denial is also the refusal to see what is there.
How can conservative justices support Obama's usurpation of the Constitution? Well, it might well have started a long time ago. Maybe the Bush-Gore election controversy, where this Atlantic piece picks up on, is just one strand in a long strand that is coming unraveled. It looks like The Atlantic's piece was projection, and the conservative/libertarian response is just plain old denial.
Obama won't follow the law, which he is bound to do under the constitution. That's the coup. It is ongoing, but evidently, nobody at the highest levels seems to get it.
I followed the 2000 election controversy pretty closely. No way Gore could win that one, but if the Supreme Court hadn't stepped in, it was going to have to go the Congress. In such a case as that, the House picks the winner, and the Senate picks the Veep. That meant Joe Lieberman would have been veep instead of Cheney. The House was Republican, so there's no way Gore could win the presidency that way.
The Supreme Court just stopped the counting which could have gone on past the "safe harbor" deadline, which was very close at hand at the time of their decision. The counting wasn't going to get done in time to get in before the safe harbor deadline, which would have thrown it into the House- by law. The Republicans controlled the House, (as Gore must have known), but the Senate was 50-50. Gore would have broken the tie in favor of Lieberman, weakening the incoming administration.
The Supreme Court then may have acted politically, but at least they were following the election law. They don't seem to be very interested in doing that anymore.
As for the rest of the article, it is pretty much the standard political fare. The author's major rhetorical thrust was the Bush v Gore decision was a type of long running coup, but it was Gore who was trying to steal the Vice Presidency if he couldn't get the Presidency itself. That's my take.
The main point to me is the total breakdown in authority that is outlined in the Constitution. There are three co-equal branches, but at the moment, the only branch that seems to matter is the Presidency. That looks like dictatorship. The President must follow the law, or what good is the Constitution anymore? Why have a Congress pass a law that the President won't enforce? Why have the Supreme Court decide the controversy, if the President decides to ignore the part of the decision that he doesn't like?
At what point will this President be restrained? If he gets re-elected, what can stop him?
The attention may be on Trump now, but Obama was POTUS when this post was written. The left may only be interested in political situations that run against them. If anything is radicalized, it is the Democrat party. Obama associated with communists, after all. Nazis were defeated decades ago.
6/26/12:
The Atlantic
This seemed like pure projection to me, but as the Supreme Court has shown, the projection and denial is going all round.
I read this yesterday, and Glenn Reynolds posted his reactions to this piece. One reaction was to be "unimpressed".
The major aspect of projection is that it denies something that is within oneself.
Plain denial is also the refusal to see what is there.
How can conservative justices support Obama's usurpation of the Constitution? Well, it might well have started a long time ago. Maybe the Bush-Gore election controversy, where this Atlantic piece picks up on, is just one strand in a long strand that is coming unraveled. It looks like The Atlantic's piece was projection, and the conservative/libertarian response is just plain old denial.
Obama won't follow the law, which he is bound to do under the constitution. That's the coup. It is ongoing, but evidently, nobody at the highest levels seems to get it.
I followed the 2000 election controversy pretty closely. No way Gore could win that one, but if the Supreme Court hadn't stepped in, it was going to have to go the Congress. In such a case as that, the House picks the winner, and the Senate picks the Veep. That meant Joe Lieberman would have been veep instead of Cheney. The House was Republican, so there's no way Gore could win the presidency that way.
The Supreme Court just stopped the counting which could have gone on past the "safe harbor" deadline, which was very close at hand at the time of their decision. The counting wasn't going to get done in time to get in before the safe harbor deadline, which would have thrown it into the House- by law. The Republicans controlled the House, (as Gore must have known), but the Senate was 50-50. Gore would have broken the tie in favor of Lieberman, weakening the incoming administration.
The Supreme Court then may have acted politically, but at least they were following the election law. They don't seem to be very interested in doing that anymore.
As for the rest of the article, it is pretty much the standard political fare. The author's major rhetorical thrust was the Bush v Gore decision was a type of long running coup, but it was Gore who was trying to steal the Vice Presidency if he couldn't get the Presidency itself. That's my take.
The main point to me is the total breakdown in authority that is outlined in the Constitution. There are three co-equal branches, but at the moment, the only branch that seems to matter is the Presidency. That looks like dictatorship. The President must follow the law, or what good is the Constitution anymore? Why have a Congress pass a law that the President won't enforce? Why have the Supreme Court decide the controversy, if the President decides to ignore the part of the decision that he doesn't like?
At what point will this President be restrained? If he gets re-elected, what can stop him?
Gerrymandering is a loser for the Dems, so it says
If both parties MAXXED OUT on gerrymandering, the House would end up with 262 Republicans to 173 Democrats -- according to leftist FiveThirtyEight.
— Ben Hart (@BenHart_Freedom) May 1, 2026
That's because Republicans control more state governments with multiple districts, and Democrat voters congregate in cities. This… pic.twitter.com/6HKKZJf6TD
America didn't lose in Vietnam. It was betrayed.
Yeah, and once Nixon was shoved out of the way, the far left (commies) began taking over the Democrat Party. We're seeing now what that leads too. Iran fell in 1979. The trouble we are having in Iran was largely because of the betrayal in Vietnam. All of this thanks to commies.
By the way, that's what the bastards in Tehran are counting on. They're getting help from the commies.
By the way, that's what the bastards in Tehran are counting on. They're getting help from the commies.
South Vietnam didn’t fall because it was beaten. It fell because it was betrayed.
— Rod D. Martin (@RodDMartin) April 30, 2026
Fifty-one years ago today, April 30, 1975, the last American helicopter lifted off the Saigon embassy roof.
We had won. Nixon and Kissinger’s Paris Peace Accords forced the North to recognize… pic.twitter.com/LF0F7DpOz7
Tar, feathers, pitchforks!
Look, parents with advanced STEM degrees just aren’t smart enough to homeschool their kids.
— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) May 1, 2026
You have to let fat retarded communist women with a BA in interpersonal communication and a Masters in uptalking handle education. https://t.co/3eZfW1mgjh
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)