Maricopa County audit video

 

Maricopa County 2020 Election Audit Presentation on Video

Comment:

This is a 3 hour presentation and it won't be understood without paying close attention to it. Consequently, the initial leak of the results is going to be misleading. It is my opinion that the initial leak was intentional in that respect. One thing that comes out here is that the county's lack of cooperation hindered the final determination of truth regarding the results of the 2020 election in Maricopa County, Arizona.

That being said, there is plenty of evidence to support further investigation. This is what I'd call "probable cause". What you may have heard about probable cause in recent years was not probable cause of a crime. There is probable cause of a crime here in my opinion. As for actual proof of that crime, it is not quite there from what I've seen. In other words, those who are guilty will try to say that the results are in, and no further investigation is necessary. But there is evidence that a crime DID occur. Since it has taken so long to get to this point, we may never know it in time to make a difference.

That is what I've believed all along and this video confirms it. What the video shows, from my examination of it so far ( which isn't complete), is that there was plenty of opportunity for hanky-panky.

To "get under the hood", so to speak, will require a lot of explication. People are impatient, and rightly so. I know I was. Patience is what is needed here if you are going to get to the truth. There is sufficient evidence here to believe that the initial leak was misleading, and there will be continual pressure to stop drilling down to the truth of the matter.

An analogy might be useful here. So, I'll relate one from my own personal experience with my vehicle. All vehicles these days have a connection to which a diagnostic tool can be attached. This will give a code of some engine condition that needs attention. However, these do not always give you a code when something is clearly wrong. The device is computerized. The computer can't always diagnose the problem when there CLEARLY is one. In my own case, the vehicle was running poorly, but no code was being produced. The advice I got was to keep driving it. Eventually it ran so badly that it was undeniable that something was wrong, but the usual devices still weren't putting out a code. A MORE SOPHISTICATED diagnostic tool was brought in and found the problem. It was a bad coil pack. The thing was replaced, problem solved.

Another analogy from personal experience. I was experiencing pain. I got several X-Rays, but nothing was showing up. Finally, the doctors ordered an MRI. They found a cancer. The cancer was treated, and things got better. Problem is solved ( I hope). The point is that a MORE SOPHISTICATED analytical tool was needed to find the problem in both of these cases.

The way this is analogous is that there needs to be closer investigation of the results of the election, but we are constantly being told that nothing is wrong, but something is definitely wrong. This video shows that more investigation is needed, but what we are likely to be told is that nothing is wrong. If you go through this, which will take a lot of patience and TIME, you are likely to discover that there was indeed some things that need to be looked at more closely and CORRECTED. It was definitely not a clean election in that county. Too much wiggle room for hanky-panky.

I need to decide how much time I want to spend on this. The same is true for everybody else out there. I've already spent hours on it. Why hours? It is 3 hours long. Just to sit through something for 3 hours straight is not always possible. There are always other things that grab your attention. But just 3 hours on it isn't enough. If I wanted to report out my opinion of what was there, I'm going to have to go over it again and again. That can run into considerable amount of time.

This little essay of a few hundred words may give you an idea. You aren't going to get results here because it was necessary to add this intro before I actually got down to business. This thing could be discussed for quite some time. Be prepared to spend some time on it, if you are that interested. As for me, I have started doing some preliminary work on the thing, but it has taken a lot more than 3 hours so far. These things take time.

Update:

I have now completely watched it all.  Here it is, half the way through Saturday, and I've been

spending all this time on this thing.

The most serious thing that I saw was with the networks.  These had connections to the internet,

and that's a problem.  ( putting that a bit too mildly)

There is not anything here that is conclusive proof of fraud.  But there remains enormous room for

suspicion.  Also, from the closing remarks, there doesn't appear to be much in the way of action to

be taken.  There are PROMISES, but that and a few buckos may get you a cup of coffee.

The reason it took so much time is that I tried to set up a complete index of screenshots to take

a look at if I wanted to take the research further.  Well, that's not for me to say, so it may have

been a waste of time to do all that.

It is primarily what I thought.  Much ado about nothing.  If there was to be anything, it would have

happened back in November of last year, and/or the time leading up to it.

All in all, even with the low expectations, it is a bit disappointing.

But the audit itself was okay.  There was too much attention paid with the paper ballots.  The real

meat of this was in the network anomalies, in which the presentation was eerily blanked out

at strategic times.  Just a coincidence, I'm sure.  /sarc

For those who expected much, there's not much here to tell you.  Sorry.

 
After proofing this update, it is loaded with format errors.  Blame that on this stupid blogger

interface.  I typed it in instead of using a text editor offline.   

As you can see, I'm a bit pissed.

Norway now classifies Covid as no more serious than flu

Norway now classifies Covid as no more serious than flu

comment:

More and more countries are dropping out of the covid panic. Too bad nobody is paying attention in DC. Or if they are, they don't give a hoop.

But this isn't bleating. If there's a will, there's a way the saying goes.

Today is the day

The Maricopa Arizona 2020 election audit will be released soon, most likely today around mid-day. The following facts should be noted, and let the noise, if any, take care of itself. As much as I'd like to believe that the election was "stolen", it wasn't. Here's why:

As mentioned many times before, this isn't a democracy. If it were, George W. Bush wouldn't have been President, and neither would have Trump. It is a Republic with democratic features, but not a Democracy. Even if it was a Democracy, that would not solve all problems. It would just change the nature of the problems.

The main problem with the elections is how they are being represented. It is a fraud to say that Joe Biden received as many votes as it is being claimed. Even though there is a Federal crime against fraud, it would have to be prosecuted by the perpetrators. It won't find against itself---that would be silly to think otherwise. Outside of that, the only things that can be done are symbolic. That is, except for one. A constitutional convention of the states. This is legal, and it could be done. But it hasn't happened before, and there's no groundswell evident of one happening any time soon.

At best, you may get some state laws changed. But state laws were disregarded in 2020. The Supreme Court refused to look at this obvious breach in the Constitution. Aside from that, all remedies have been exhausted---except for the one mentioned.

The odds against an Article V convention of states is pretty high. But there may be a way to get one. Not that there is any groundswell, but if you really want to do something that could make a difference, there you are. Otherwise, it is all political agitation that means little action. Political agitation is not in the wheelhouse of the Republicans anyway. In fact, their wheelhouse is to do as little as possible. If we had to count on the Republicans to do anything useful, we might as well wait for hell to freeze over first.

Just more political theater. However, if there is something obviously uncovered, perhaps something worthwhile can come of it. But I am not optimistic.

Police riot down under

 

There have been several days of unrest in Australia recently. The people there are protesting, but the regime doesn't seem to like it. The narrator says the lockdowns were severe. Evidently, people there are protesting things like that. Things like that now include the so-called "vaccine". If you don't want the vaccine, they send in the MRAPS.

A bit of news ( at least to me) today. In the comment section on CTH ( but not in the post in which I found this), was something about the Johnson and Johnson Covid jab. Someone said that it was made with "recombitant DNA". Well, that is a bit different from the others. So, I researched that a bit, and found that the side effects include clotting.

It should be noted that these "vaccines" were rushed into existence. Normally they take much longer to develop. There is not enough information about the safety and effectiveness of these jabs. If it turns out that they cause more harm than good, then what??? Saying you're sorry, but that "we meant well" isn't going to cut it.

On the other hand, there are a number of anti-virals which could be re-purposed to fight it. Why not allow the alternatives, as opposed to causing all this mayhem? Part of it is to establish control. These people are more into control than anything else. It is a device to divide society against itself. Divide and conquer is the strategy.

What do the protesters want? Well, if it happens here, it should be about freedom. You should be able to decide for yourself how you respond to this situation. But these tyrants want to force people into their mold no matter what it takes. The result is a situation like this one.

In the old days, the USA used to condemn these types of police-state tactics used in Iron Curtain countries. These days, the Corn Pop regime wants to emulate the bad old Soviet Union. The Prava media flunkies and their cohorts just fall into line. They won't condemn it, on the contrary, they'll support it. There's something very wrong there. Hopefully enough folks start to recognize that and be willing to do something to discourage this kind of behavior here. These protestors aren't "mostly peaceful". They were totally peaceful. The narrator says all this was unprovoked.

Update:

Unique perspective. It is one in which nobody, including yours truly, even considered.

After all, just writing stuff like this doesn't do much. Protesting doesn't do much, unless...

... it is done in the most effective way possible. Ask whatever you can for a way to do the most effective thing. It is an idea worth considering and maybe doing... maybe

You, In Fact, Have ALL The Power. Use It

El Salvador

 

El Salvador is giving Ivermectin away for free

Comment:

It seems that El Salvador is now better governed than the USA, and especially Australia. Very revealing fact of how badly we are governed right now. Pretty soon, the invaders might reconsider coming here. ( seriously )

The government here is making decisions that will destroy the economy and led to social upheaval. Not a good thing to be doing if you want peace and prosperity.

Update:

The list grows. Another country decides to go their own way on the Globalist Party Commie Line.



President of Croatia says no mas to Jabs

Aussie News--- Sky News Helos on No Fly List

Aussie news: Sky News helos on 'no-fly list'

Gee, that must be a gruesome outfit there to get on a no-fly list. What are they doing that is so bad??? Showing something that the regime doesn't want the people to see?

A few questions: 1) Isn't Australia considered to be a "free country"? Is it part of the "free world" anymore? Does the "free-world" moniker even mean anything now? 2) Aren't "no fly lists" meant for terrorist supporting countries, like Saddam Hussein's Iraq? 3) Why isn't the Biden Regime condemning these restrictions upon Human Rights? 4) It seems like former President Jimmy Carter was big on Human Rights. Where's "Jimmah" on this one?

Readers here may have noticed my use of the word "commie" these days. Would it be of interest to you if you knew that the Prime Minister of Australia is on the so-called "right"? It did to me. Which means that there isn't a dime's worth of difference between the terms "right" and "left". Ronald Reagan thought the same and so do I. ( for a long time now )

The words you use are important. Words are symbols, like the World Trade Center in New York in 2001, and the Pentagon, White House, a flag, and so forth. If you use words, at least understand their meaning. A pandemic is a word that can be used to frighten people. Why use that word, as well as other words, unless there was an intention behind it?

I use the words I use not for a shock effect, but as a stimulus to get people to think. One thing that is missing these days is any thought for where this is all going.

Facts, not commie propaganda

COVID cribsheet - forget the commie bs

Facts, not commie propaganda

Comment: It is long, so I'll shorten it up. If you need more info, go to the link above ^^^

PART I: “COVID DEATHS” & MORTALITY

1. The survival rate is over 99%.

2. There is no unusual excess mortality.

3. Covid death counts are artificially inflated

4. The vast majority of covid deaths have serious comorbidities.

5. Average age of “Covid death” is greater than the average life expectancy.

6. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural mortality curve.

7. There has been a massive increase in the use of “unlawful” DNRs.

PART II: LOCKDOWNS

8. Lockdowns do not prevent the spread of disease

9. Lockdowns kill people.

10. Hospitals were never unusually over-burdened.

PART III: PCR TESTS

11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose illness.

12. PCR Tests have a history of being inaccurate and unreliable.

13. The CT values of the PCR tests are too high.

14. The World Health Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced false positives.

15. The scientific basis for Covid tests is questionable.

PART IV: “ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION”

16. The majority of Covid infections are “asymptomatic”.

17. There is very little evidence supporting the alleged danger of “asymptomatic transmission”.

PART V: VENTILATORS

18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses.

19. Ventilators killed people.

PART VI: MASKS

20. Masks don’t work.

21. Masks are bad for your health.

22. Masks are bad for the planet.

PART VII: VACCINES

23. Covid “vaccines” are totally unprecedented.

24. Vaccines do not confer immunity or prevent transmission.

25. The vaccines were rushed and have unknown longterm effects.

26. Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal indemnity should they cause harm.

PART VIII: DECEPTION & FOREKNOWLEDGE

28. A “training exercise” predicted the pandemic just weeks before it started.

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has “disappeared”.

30. The elite have made fortunes during the pandemic.

Debt Limit Fight Is Totally Phony – Lunch Alert!

Debt Limit Fight Is Totally Phony – Lunch Alert!

Comment:

I would add that it appears to be coercive.  This is a pattern of behavior that is more and more noticeable.  It is also anathema to a free society

Once upon a time we would 

have said it was un-American .

Deliverance from the Dead Zone. ( repost )

Update:

There appears to be a new angle to this idea.

It involves replacing plastics with algae.

The original post follows:

10.21.13:

Note:  In connection with a space mirror, the output from this proposition could be increased significantly.  Use the profits from the sale of drop in fuels in order to expand the enterprise.

....

What's with the title?  What's this Dead Zone stuff, an allusion to a Steven King novel?  Throw in the reference to the Burt Reynolds movie and it looks like a double ripoff.  Yeah, well I have to do something to get your attention.  Very funny.  Ha, ha.  Funnier than a barrel of Congresscritters.

Actually, the title is reference to The Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone --- where nothing lives.  The Deliverance part is a proposed solution that is a speculation alert.  Why?  Because I don't know if it will work, or even if it could work, whether or not our corrupt system will actually allow a solution to a problem to be implemented.

The idea is to grow seaweed in the Dead Zone.  Harvest the seaweed and make biofuels out of it.  Eventually, the drop-in biofuels could be converted to hydrogen for fuel cells.  You kill two birds with one stone.  Eliminate the Dead Zone and lick the global warming "problem".  Throw in energy security as a bonus.  What's not to like?  Heck, you could create a lot of jobs and economic growth with this.  Only a Congresscritter could hate it.

Let's look at the Gulf shall we?  First of all, consider its typography---depth of the Gulf of Mexico.  The Dead Zone lies directly offshore on the shallow shelf area.  A good place to put something there if it requires a shallow body of water.  Here's some more info on Gulf of Mexico pollution via Wikipedia.  I figured that since algae already grows there in this Dead Zone, you could substitute the seaweed and force the red tide out of the picture.  Voila!  End of red tides and the Dead Zone.

You would need a massive public works project to implement the idea.  The shelf areas of the Gulf are probably not conducive to the growth of seaweed, so you may have to add something to the shelf that the seaweed can attach to.  That is, seaweed clings to rocks, but the bottom of the Gulf is sandy.  Replace the sand with rocks or something else, like chicken wire perhaps?

You could start small and work your way up.  Perhaps the 8000 square mile area could be divvied up amongst entrepreneurs parcel-by-parcel until the entire Dead Zone is covered in seaweed farms.

This isn't necessarily a novel idea.  They do a lot of this in Asia, as noted in an earlier post.  Here's a few links on the subject that I "dredged up" ( pardon the pun) on the subject.

• Kelp For Farmers: Seaweed Becomes A New Crop In America
• Scientists claim major breakthrough in seaweed biofuel
• The Power of Seaweed

The Ongoing Soft Coup Circus

Update:

Technofog mentions Crowdstrike in connection to the indictment of Sussman.

There are several posts about Crowdstrike on this blog.  I chose this one to update in connection to what Technofog is writing about.

There is other stuff out there that Bongino mentioned yesterday.

The original post of Feb 2019 follows

Comment

If you look at this as a concept, and as a principle, the concept is that everything is a circus.  The principle is constant and unrelenting falsehood...

First principles always...  The first thing to remember is that---- the only crime that anybody has cited in relation to an actual collusion case with Russia with respect to the 2016 election---was an alleged hack into the emails of the DNC.

The only confirmation of this is from an organization hired by the DNC, "Crowdstrike" I believe the name was, that is in effect an employee of the DNC.

This is like claiming a break in at your residence, and you're hiring a private investigator to confirm what you claim, and expecting the police to stand down on any investigation of your premises.  Yes, that much, and more... The police takes the PI's word for it in toto....

What kind of police department would accept that as evidence or as probable cause?  At best there is probable cause for investigating the premises, but that is it.  Unless that investigation of the crime scene takes place, then there should be no further investigation, because there is no probable cause.

Everybody seems to avoid this fundamental principle, which suggests to me unrelenting falsehood.  The unrelenting falsehood is driving the concept of these circuses, which are to distract and confuse the population.

President Trump Tweets Interesting Response to McCabe's Soft Coup Diatribe... https://t.co/oNm4uzSP9N via @thelastrefuge2

— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) February 19, 2019

Cognitive dissonance should be a plus not a minus

 

Recently there was something on the webs which said that it was a mistake to continue to use logic and reason on someone who is in cognitive dissonance. Maybe so, but shouldn't this be considered a plus and not a minus? For to have cognitive dissonance, one's deeply held opinions have been challenged, and perhaps that is an opportunity to take a closer look at those opinions. However, one's ego gets in the way of this. That's why it is a minus. For someone who thinks differently about one's mistakes, it can be a positive thing. That is because a correction could very well be needed.

Nobody is perfect, even though some folks may try to argue with that. The recognition of imperfection, and its universal existence amongst the two legged primate species, should allow one to at least entertain the notion that one is wrong about something. You cannot always be right. There's going to be times when a course correction is needed. When cognitive dissonance appears, it is time to take a closer look at why you believe what you do. It may be hard to do this, but the alternative is not so good. The only way to stop digging deeper into the hole you're in is to stop digging. You know what I mean, Vern?

There are those out there, and I may well be one of them, who have a very strong idea about what is right and good, and the opposite. When something happens that challenges that view, there have been times when the old cognitive dissonance appeared to be at hand for yours truly. In those times, I went back and took a good hard look at what I was doing and thinking. It has led to the firmly held belief that I am definitely not right all the time. Might I suggest that to anyone reading this now, and to suggest also the same approach?

You may not be able to reach someone with logic, reason and evidence. But it shouldn't mean that you give up on it. Maybe in those times when you are dealing with someone who you suspect is in that mode, that a change in approach may be necessary. After all, if you keep pushing somebody's button, something may go off. It might not be pretty.

Another thing I found helpful is when things get a little hot and bothered, a time out can be called. You know, like in football, a hand signal in the form of a "t", which means to stop and wait a bit. A cooling off period, if you will. It might help. Or it might just be a period before the next round in a big fight. At least somebody might get out of the situation without getting killed. I like being on this side of the dirt as opposed to the other side.

Anyways, I am not saying that I am in cognitive dissonance. Or not so much. It seems that a lot of those in this business of punditry don't spend enough time DOING constructive things, as opposed to complaining incessantly about every little thing under the sun. Just saying, it needs to stay constructive. That is all.

Sarah Palin, Boris Johnson And How To Get Elected By Telling Good Jokes In The Internet Age

 Free Republic

Update:

This 2014 post may show that the fake news stuff started before Trump.

Also, Boris Johnson is a bit questionable.

The original post...

comment:

Who said Sarah was joking?  I kinda hope she wasn't.

Also, the "jokes" the author cites aren't funny.  I suppose they are funny in the self hating European environment, and maybe it might even get a few laughs from our America hating Democrats.  But as Limbaugh once said, for humor to be good, there has to be some truth in what is being said.  The "jokes" were in poor taste and partisan, not funny.

As for UKIP, I don't know much about British politics, but Labor sucks for sure.  The Conservatives aren't too far behind.  You may be able to cobble up something decent from all the dissent from Labor, but you never really know what's on these guys minds.  If they would unite to defeat Labor, some progress might even be possible.

Where did Forbes dredge up this colossal bore?

Why use "commies" with regards to the opposition?

There was a thought that was almost lost overnite. I resolved to write about it, but as it so often happens, the next day the thought was forgotten. The thought just returned to me now, so off I go with the thought.

The thing that jogged my memory was the developments down-under. The union leadership are sellouts, and the union MEMBERS don't feel represented. To me, this looks like a common theme all over the place. The takeover of the culture and such. It is a Gramscian move-- that is to say, take over the high ground of the society, and move the culture towards communism. They take over the leadership in many places, and lo and behold, they are no longer responsive to the people that they are supposed to represent.

That's one thought. Another thought arises from that. If you take over the high ground of the culture, what do you end up with? Yes, a bunch of commies in high offices; but also, the things that go with it. All of it. As far as America is concerned, it is supposed to be a "bottom-up" organizing principle--as opposed to a top-down organizing principle. Commies are definitely "top-down". They are so top-down that all power flows from just a small group of people. "Consent of the governed" doesn't go with communism. Once they get into power, they won't let go no matter what. The public be damned.

It was the communists themselves that coined the term "dicatorship of the proletariat". There are many who fall for that line of baloney. But it never really is enough to get the ball over the goal line. So to do that, they have to do what they are doing now. This Gramscian move is in place all over. They are now dictating from above. Never mind what people think of it. It doesn't require legitimate elections, but it does require the APPEARANCE of such. At least for the time being while they consolidate their hold.

The Declaration of Independence in America was a blueprint for popular government. Popular government isn't very popular amongst the governing classes right now. But they are happy to claim it as a "democracy", but that is not what they are about.

A bit of a side bar here: Seems like there are those who believe that once somebody goes into what is called "cognitive dissonance", they become close-minded. So, it might be a mistake to continually use logic, reason, and evidence in your arguments with them. Indeed, the argument appears to be over. Now it is time to ascertain whether or not the "center" can hold. If not, a whole lot of trouble is ahead.

There are those on the so-called conservative side that may object to what I write here. They'll probably swear up and down that they are against communism. Maybe they truly believe so, but look at what is happening. Just look and think about it. The commies need something to make it appear that they have broad public support. Nobody who is conservative should be lending any kind of support whatsoever with their attempts to push society over the cliff into a communist wasteland. Voting against it in Congress isn't good enough. The times are extraordinary, the old easier ways are no longer good enough. Just voting won't cut it when the commies are on the march.

Update:

Ah! One more point that I forgot about... In an autobiography, given by Nikita Khrushev, it seems that he used the word "cadres" a lot. This is commie-speak for "gangs". The gangs are highly organized to achieve a purpose. Such cadres could exist today, in THIS country. They are most likely organized to achieve the purposes of one facet or another of the overall plan for pushing the country into communism.

If you were to point that out, the propaganda cadre would call you a "conspiracy theorist". So you don't believe that people are working in lockstep with each other to push an agenda that is increasingly radical?

The Spygate scandal is heating up again. They have some cadres, whose purpose was to gin up a phony scandal against Trump. They worked hand-in-hand with the other cadres mentioned above to push the phony collusion narrative to the public.

The Educational cadres are out there pushing an Anti-American "critical race theory". If you question it, the other cadres come to the aid of the Educrats, who are nothing more than commie indoctrination specialists.

It's no conspiracy theory when you look at the results. The commies want to make it all seem organic, but it is a totally manufactured result. It has come a long, long, way. They are right there on the cusp of pushing us over the cliff into the hell of communism.

Irrational

"$"-quote: "Half the Vaccinated died, and none of the Unvaccinated died. Watch both clips."

comment:

I didn't go through these stories. The point is that the meta-data from Israel supports the fact that "vaccines" don't work. The rest is plausible on that fact alone in my opinion.

The hysterical opposition to alternatives is not rational. That is why I call it hysterical.

List of alt-tech companies to switch to on sidebar

Nikki Minaj

Hysterical opposition to covid mitigation alternatives results in cancelling one of their own.

comment:

Here's a story comparing the hip-hop artist Nikki Minaj to Paul Revere. All the hip-hop artist did was to tell an anecdotal story, and they cannot take it. If anybody criticizes the jab, the woke mob goes nuts.

The jab mandate must be annihilated. It cannot just be evaded or ignored. It must be absolutely destroyed on all levels possible. The impulse behind it is NOT based upon concern for public health. It is a pure power grab.

Origo --- Give it all up for you

 

Interesting song. The artist is hard to find in searches. Evidently the song was written by someone named Erik Fernholm, and this person or group named "Origo" recorded it. There is a list of songs here:

Shazam-- Music playlists etc. "Origo"

I was just looking for some useful videos, and there was this song that was playing in the background on a video. It seemed interesting, so I started researching it. This is all I found in several minutes of looking. Not much there on the artists who put this together. Catchy little tune.

Several commmenters noted some disappointment that the song isn't lots more popular. It appears to have been released about two years ago.

Genius lyrics for "Give it all up for you"

Maha says Bush is a weenie

 

Mahablog: George W. Bush is a "weenie"

It may all be a mistake to relate all this, but it is the truth to the best of my recollection. The reason that it may be a mistake is that people are very reluctant to acknowledge their own errors. Yes, and Bush just made a gigantic doozy on the 911 anniversary recently. The reason is that he is "useful idiot" for the left. But what does the leftists think? Well, at the time, one lefty blogger called George W. Bush a "weenie". What she meant is that he was a weakling.

By the way,  Jimmy Carter called Dubya's daddy a wimp.  

So the weakling is a "weenie". A slang word that is an apt description, but at the time, it didn't seem so. At the same time he was a "weenie", he was also a whole lot of other things, like the reincarnation of Hitler. The Hitler stuff was easy enough to see through; but this weenie stuff? Not as easy. That's because Bush did seem to give off some stronger vibes at the time. But at the heart of it all, he might be the weeniest of them all for allowing himself to be used for the left's victory celebration on 911. They were celebrating the weeniedom of Bush's policies, and of Bush's legacy. They were celebrating the weeniedom of America, which is their primary objective.

The leftists luxuriate in victimhood. There were so many victims on 911! So many victims, so little time. They have to play catch up for all those years we actually cared about protecting this country. For awhile there, Bush did. But look at him now, validating their left's victory lap in Afghanistan. Their goal is to get us all not caring anymore, and it looks like they overcame the big weenie--Bush. For the moment, at least, Trump is next.

I DID believe Bush for awhile. I supported the Florida recount. I defended him.  I might have gone to the mattreses for him.   My bad. I should have seen it. Even though the 911 response was inadequate, it was better than nothing, which is what the left preferred. They preferred the apology tour too, if memory serves. Nothing is worse for them than to defend America, which is a bad country. ( according to what they are always saying)

You may recall that I mentioned the man named Kaarlo Tuomi. Tuomi was a Soviet agent sent to infiltrate America at about the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis. In those days, we had a muscular country that actually believed in defending itself, as opposed to going on apology tours. This country's laws restricted immigration. Aliens had to register, because I remember seeing the PSA ads on TV back then. Tuomi was caught almost immediately when entering the US. Contrast that with the 911 highjackers, who would stand out like a sore thumb even in these times. The FBI could find infiltrators back then, but the FBI couldn't find their own ass with a Garmin, a seeing eye dog, and a Rand McNally Atlas these days when it comes to terrorists. These days, the FBI thinks that patriots are the problem. Weeniedom is very contagious, like a pandemic of sorts.

Trump is a throwback to the kind of leader that we once had. Those leaders were the NORM, now they are the EXCEPTION. Ponder on that one for awhile while you sink into weeniedom, Americans. The people who seem to enthrall you are the very ones celebrating the loss in Afghanistan.

Guys like Bush think it is important to unify with the same people who do these kinds of things. That's what makes him a big weenie. The Mahablogger knew it, but why don't we? Another thing to ponder on while we sink into weeniedom. Maybe the next 911 event will generate the kind of response the left prefers which is nothing or even better ( from their point of view), another apology tour.

It may be a mistake to mention it, because folks just double down on mistakes.  But the facts are to the best of my recollection.

To fail to mention them would also be an error.  If the current trends hold, the weenification will be complete.  Maybe there's still a chance.