Believe what you will

Comment:

The controversy surrounding the events of the JFK assassination has taken on a life of its own. It may never die. As for the video, I recall watching the show when it was on teevee some thirty years ago. It was about something that happened almost thirty years before that show aired. So now, that event is almost sixty years old.

People have written books about the assassination. The one I've got was written by Vincent Bugliosi. Bugliosi didn't think there was a conspiracy, and gave ample evidence that it was not. As for Oliver Stone's movie, there were a few scenes that were made up from thin air. Bugliosi seems more credible to me.

My viewpoint is a lot like Bellisario's when he says that people "want to believe in it". You hear an awful lot about conspiracy theories these days. Conspiracy theories can cut both ways. Maybe we should look beyond the conspiracy theory allegations, and look at from the viewpoint of "cui bono". Who benefits from the use of a conspiracy theory for some advantage? It goes both ways. Those who set forth a conspiracy theory, and those who try to refute it.

The best way to refute a conspiracy theory is with facts. But there's that problem with the desire to believe a conspiracy theory mentioned above. Facts themselves can be disputed, or denied.

I've checked into it ( the JFK assassination conspiracy theory) about as much as I'd like to. At some point, you have to decide for yourself what you believe. I don't believe there was one with respect to JFK. As for the latest being floated about and denied today ( with regards to the 2020 election), there hasn't been enough facts that have come to the fore to put it to rest one way or another. One thing is certain: there's no way Brandon got 81 million votes. No way. Interesting to note who is trying to capitalize politically upon it, and who is trying to suppress any honest investigation of it.

It does not add up

Once again, I point out that the poll about the direction of the country is very much on the wrong track, yet Brandon gets 44% approval in the latest Rasmussen poll. Once again, I say that it doesn't add up. Something is very wrong here.

Not only about Brandon's performance, but all that has proceeded prior to this... A very long train of abuses by the ones who are responsible for this mess. How does that lead to a 44% approval rating??? It simply does not make sense.

Why would anyone approve of the thing that is causing them concern? When has Brandon and Co. ever been right about ANYTHING???

The only explanation is that something is very, very wrong here. But we will be very lucky if we ever find out the truth, because these people are certainly not very interested in that. That's putting it mildly.

Even if the GOP wins in November, there's no guarantee that we'll get the truth. Still, there is at least some hope that the lies will have to slow down a little. The GOP has to at least PRETEND to care about the truth. Otherwise why bother voting for, or contributing to their fake party?

If the GOP would play this right, the Democrats could not do what they do routinely. But they won't. Still the options are between the fake GOP opposition that has to pretend to oppose these monsters, and a monstrous entity that will never be held to account. Not a very pretty picture.

We need a bigger boat.

Profit scam

It was never a vaccine after all

People may be finally waking up to the scam pulled with regards to the miscalled covid vaccine. It's on the Bongino show today.

I feel like I was way ahead of the curve on this one. There was NEVER any justification for a mandate, but it was ordered anyway. Not only that, there wasn't even a justification for an emergency use authorization that would have made the mandate possible. That's because if there is an alternative that can work, then there cannot be an emergency authorization.

Nobody seems to want to talk about this, but it is kinda late for some people. You know, when people die, it is kinda permanent. If you jack around with your DNA, like this so-called vaccine does, it is kinda permanent. If it screws you up, it's kinda permanent. Better be sure about what you put into your veins.

I didn't get the vaccine. Based upon what's happening now, I'm very glad I didn't. To tell you the truth, there wasn't the slightest chance I was ever going to put that shit into my veins.

There needs to be accountability for this, but the chances aren't so good that there will be. It may not even make a ripple in the election. It should have made people livid. It amazes me what they let these people get away with.

I've included a re-post of some of what I was saying. It's not like there wasn't anybody warning you people.

Originally posted in May 2021

Seen on Barnhardt. I'd call it the quote of the day. "You cannot fund vaccines if there's an effective treatment." Otherwise known as a scam. It's worse than that. It's not even a vaccine. So here you are--- funding a vaccine that isn't, when one isn't even necessary because there's an effective treatment.

We have a saying around here. It's called a "profit scam". I don't know the technical definition, but it is definitely like that.

Walk outside your door and get attacked by mule deer

The woman walks outside and is confronted by a mule deer. The mule deer attacks her dogs and she goes after the mule deer. That was a mistake. The deer probably wouldn't have hurt her dog, but she was a lot easier target.

The man cautioned her to back away. But she didn't.

The lesson here? Just because you may have a nice house, nature hasn't gone away. There are worse things than mule deer. Taking a wild animal on with no weaponry of any kind ( she used a bag or purse ) is not a good idea.

Out on my property, I carry around a machete. Sometimes a side arm. Even then, you may not have enough time. Actually, the two legged varmints are more troublesome.

The persistence of opinions

How deep a dive into this topic is hard to say. Let's just call it speculation for the moment. The topic is what people associate with their identities. If it is what you believe to be true, and it gets associated with your own self image, it may be really hard to change your mind about it.

With respect to political matters, if one's identity is wrapped up in a political view, change may well become impossible. Hence you may get people who won't change their minds in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. Their opinions seem a bit ( shall we say) crazy. It's this identification with ones viewpoint that is at issue. If it isn't changeable at all, regardless of facts, then discussion may be useless. Or so I posit here.

It would seem that these beliefs can be somehow imprinted upon people at a young age. It is almost like in the animal kingdom. A young bird may imprint upon a human and identify more with humans than its own kind. Is that same kind of thing possible with people? I think it might. If you catch someone at a young enough age, you can affect their perceptions for a lifetime.

Something tells me that this has been well known for centuries. After all, Socrates was forced to drink the hemlock for "corrupting the morals of youth". (If memory serves, which it may not. This is a speculation, after all.) It isn't the only example, as there are others.

Thusly, how the young are educated is of prime importance to the state. It may well explain the efforts at teaching kids "CRT". It would not be well to underestimate the significance of this, if my theory is correct. A kid may be turned against his/her parents, community, and country in such a manner.

Once a kid gets indoctrinated with it, it won't be easy to change it, you see. This is precisely why they are so intent upon implementing it.

Likewise, it may be hard to understand why so many people these days seem impervious to facts. There may be a reason for that, and this is offered as a reason why it appears to be the case. I've wondered often why Brandon's numbers seem impervious to the obvious fact that he is an absolute disaster.

A possible cure would be something that can counter the programming. Good luck with that. If your brain is wired, so to speak, in the Marxist paradigm, it may take a traumatic event to break the spell. Hopefully, you won't have a glass of "Kool-aid" in your hands before you step back and ask why are you doing this?

How is this legal

How is this legal?

Dan Bongino often mentions how the government is "deputizing" Big Tech to do things that they cannot legally do themselves. This would mean the cancel culture that has become an epidemic in America. As Bongino noted many times, this isn't legal. There are court cases that say that they cannot do this constitutionally. Yet they are doing the cancelling, and now this. This is just ratcheting it up a notch, which is akin to forfeiture. For this is a case in which involves judicial powers. Paypal has become a judicial power somehow, which can now "fine" people.

These are corporations, not courts of law. They have no authority to impose fines. None at all. In fact, if the Supreme Court didn't previously allow confiscation of property, they wouldn't have been able to do this under the rubric of forefeiture. No entity, not even the government, can take your property without due process. But here is Paypal threatening to "fine" people who use their platform for anything to which they do not agree with, or violates their policies.

This government has gone insane. Corporations are not government, but acting in that role now. It is as if nobody in the government respects the law at all, and have neglected their own duties, and have allowed corporations to take the law into their own hands. What's next? Corporations arresting people?

Do you see what is happening here? The Supreme Court starts it off with forfeiture, which itself is in violation of the Constitution. The executive powers are delegated to the police. Under separation of powers, the executive authority enforces the law, it doesn't make law. The judicial power decides upon the legality of actions of the state. So, the government abandons those duties, and shifts the executive and judicial functions of the state---to the "private" sphere. This is deputizing its own functions. Problem is, it isn't in accord with the Constitution, and it is a flagrant violation of our rights. Where is it said that the government can deputize all of its functions to the private sphere?

To put it simply, the corporations have been deputized to be judge, jury and executioner of poltical correctness. This is insane. There are no checks and balances, no rule of law, just them telling everybody what they can say, do, and think. They can take your money on a whim. There would be no appeal. Appeal to whom? The government has allowed this situation to develop through neglect. There's no damned way that Paypal should be able to do this, but here we are.