Dick Morris says that 'woke' left defends looting as powerful tactic to achieve change

 

Dick Morris says that 'woke' left defends looting as powerful tactic to achieve change.

Comment:

Then the woke left are communists. What is the change they are seeking? Communism. Unless you want communism, then this has to be stopped.

By the way, communism isn't inevitable. If you believe that, then you believe their propaganda. That's what communists have always said---that communism is inevitable. The only way it is inevitable is if nobody opposes them. As anyone can see, to oppose them would require some personal risk. These people are crazy.

As for events like January 6th, patriots don't want to overthrow the government. It doesn't make sense to engage in sedition or insurrection unless the opposition is to the ones who are actually overthrowing the government.

You cannot have a sedition to maintain the current state of government! Geez, that should need no explanation. Therefore, whatever happened on January 6th could only have come from the type of people who Dick Morris is referring to. Law and order types don't break the law. The ones breaking the law are the ones who keep disregarding the law and attempting to establishing themselves as the law---as opposed to the Constitution and the laws arising from it.

It happens quite often that these people intend to "get around" the Constitution. After all, isn't that what Dick Morris is referring to? You have to support the laws, as the laws support free enterprise. That is, unless the Constitution is abolished. It is implied in the Constitution. Abolishing private property invalidates the Constitution. Therefore, what the so-called "woke" want is a revolution. Their revolution would be a communist one.

Call things by their right names. There is so many false things nowadays. This is just another one. Use of the word "woke" is just another way to say "communist". It is the same thing with a new name.

Jan 6th False Flag News

Jan. 6 Defendant Fingers Four Possible Undercover Agents

Comment:

The defendants are gathering evidence for a defense. As in the Flynn case, the gubbermint is withholding exculpatory information. Why would they ever do that???

This is government malfeasance and fraud. There needs to be a wholesale sweep of the bad elements. This might make DC a ghost town. But that would be an improvement of crap like this.

Why would anybody suspect a false flag on Jan. 6th? You'd have to be imbibing a lot of commie pinko propaganda not to see it.

In other False Flag "news"--- commie Yahoo doesn't get it, but maybe they will eventually.

The Jan 6th committee is fake like everything else in DC. The commies dominated committee went after Bannon. Note how Yahoo uses "right-wing". I see the use of such language as a dead-giveaway that the writer is pinko. That's pinko word usage, and nobody in the know would use it. Either the author is a numbskull or he is a pinko operative. I see no other alternative. Bannon is falsely accused. The committee is fake and is trying hard to come up with a reason for its existence. They need scalps and Bannon seems handy for them. Here's the link:

Steve Bannon’s Jan. 6 Legal Strategy: ‘Blowing Up the Whole System’

Usurpers gotta usurp

Florida has lowest COVID rate, Michigan has worst

Comment:

Yep, and Trump had the "better off than 4 years ago" poll and see what good it did him.

Usupation is the word. Performance doesn't matter. Truth doesn't matter. Logic, reason, and evidence doesn't matter. Usurpation is the word.

Why use usurpation with regard to this link? It is because the ruling regime doesn't want good governance. If we get that, they lose power. They can only gain power by inflicting distress. This is the way the communists did it throughout the Cold War. They are now doing it here, in the once Good 'ol USA.

Not to inflict distress upon those of you who deny the obvious fact that the ruling regime could care less about you, what you think, or even if you live or die- but the truth will set you free. That is the good news. Here's a bit of truth for those of you who still care about that. Too bad that not everybody does.

Everything that comes from the regime is a fraud. Fraud is a Federal Offense. The so-called election last year was fraudulent. The attempts to set this right are half-hearted, and also fraudulent. Usurpation is everywhere all the time. If it was not the case, then why was Trump punished for doing a good enough job so that the majority were "better off" than four years ago? It doesn't make sense unless the election was a fraud. It was made fraudulent by the COVID fraud. Fraud enables this usurpation. Without fraud, there would be no COVID, no lockdowns, no phony vaccines, and no phony "election".

The Media is a fraud, and is helping the usurpation. People's rights are being trampled upon by the very people who have sworn an oath to protect these rights. These rights were built into the law and guaranteed, but those who took the oath to protect those rights, are the ones usurping them.

There was no sedition on January 6th. Even if they did violence, they did so in reaction to this usurpation, and were defending the Constitution, not attacking it. Those who wouldn't investigate and uncover the fraud of the 2020 election were the seditionists who are usurping the document they swore to protect. The "riot" was probably instigated by malice aforethought by those who wish to paint patriots as traitors. This accusation of the usurpers is a cover-up for their own usurpation.

An honest investigation will never be allowed by the usurpers because that would uncover their fraud and end their usurpation. The usurpation ends when the usurpers are brought to justice for their crimes. This includes many on BOTH sides of the so-called divide. Just remember one thing---they lie continually. They can NEVER admit that. They can NEVER allow the truth to surface. That would be deadly to them.

General Longstreet and Gettysburg

 

Let's clear one thing up completely before I start. If it isn't completely clear already. I am no expert on the Civil War. No expert on war. Frankly, I don't know if I am expert at anything except running off my piehole. Yep. I like to expound upon things I know very little about. Having said that, here I go again...

Going by the movie by the name "Gettysburg", which is a Ted Turner production, General Longstreet comes out smelling like a rose. Not everybody at the time thought so. Come to think of it, I am not so sure he deserves at least SOME criticism. But the critical inference is there in the movie. You have to look for it, though.

Longstreet ( in the movie) sought to persuade Lee not to make the attack, and to choose better ground for a battle. In the end, he agreed to everything that Lee told him to do, but later seemed to be complaining about it. In the movie, he can be seen saying "we can take that hill"--meaning the hill on which Pickett's unit was destroyed. What else could he have done?

Again, according to the movie, Longstreet attempted to cede his authority to another general to lead the attack. Seeing that General Lee did not agree, he changed his mind, and went along with the plan. This is where Longstreet should have shut up about it. Or he could have resigned, and refused to lead an attack in which he knew could not succeed.

So why didn't he? That one is above my paygrade. I don't know why. But maybe he was the type of guy who would surrender his own judgement to somebody who he could not refuse. He joined the Republicans after the war. I think, and it is just my opinion; that Longstreet should have kept his mouth shut after that battle. That's if all this is factually correct, which it might not be.

Anyway, I talked out my ass again, so there's it all is. For what it is worth.

Colin Kaepernick

Earlier today there was this communication from the dude who claims that the Rittenhouse verdict was part of "white supremacy". He also said that they system needs to be overthrown. Why is such a statement not an incitement to violence and or sedition?

The truth is that the jury system works for everyone's benefit. It isn't racist because a white man went free while some folks thought he should have been punished. The jury system may not be perfect, because OJ Simpson went free after the murder trial in 1995.

Actually, a jury system is vital to restrain an oppressive government. Kaepernick ought to be more careful about what he wants. If a system is overthrown, how does he know that something worse may take its place?

From a conservative's viewpoint, the government is becoming quite oppressive. With all the lockdowns, masks, and mandatory jabs to mention only a few of these; it would seem that a jury system is one of the few things that we have left. To lose that could mean total government control over EVERYTHING. That might please the radicals in the government today, but it doesn't do anything good for the rest of us.

It might appeal to Kaepernick types, but when the government goes against YOU, and it WILL eventually, you might start to see why it isn't such a good idea to get rid of the jury system. As a matter of fact, a good many things that are being ignored today should be put BACK their high station in a free society. It seems like we have lost our freedom of speech. We have lost our right to do what we will with our own bodies, as well as our own land. Not to mention the UNLAWFUL holding of the January 6th protestors without a speedy trial, nor bail. There is also an unprecedented attempt to surveil people without probable cause-- "no unreasonable searches and seizures".

Our government is out of control. People like Kaepernick aren't helping to correct that.

Gettysburg, prelude to Pickett's Charge

Comment:

Further study on the subject reveals that the Confederates at the time didn't think they could hold Little Round Top for long. The attacks on the flanks on the previous day was a failure. General Lee believed that the Union Army was going to be watching for an attack on the flanks again. But Union Gen. Meade predicted the attack on the center.

Lee also thought his artillery could break up the enemy artillery before they had to make the 1 mile plus charge across the open field. That didn't happen. There wasn't enough ammunition. Their lines were too long to get additional help to support the attack.

There is also some discussion that Gen. Longstreet tried to call off the attack. But that did not happen either. Given the fog of war, even if he did, it was too late.

It all may have been inevitable. Lee was outnumbered and outgunned. His only advantage was the will to win, but after the battle on the previous day, it wasn't altogether certain that the South had the greater will to win than the North. If Meade was prepared for the attack, then Lee made a mistake in attacking. At any rate, he did attack and the attack failed.

Lee made a big gamble on winning it all on one battle. Recent history has shown that the long term approach may have had the better chance.