For those who call others a liar

The word "liar" seems to get bandied about a lot these days. You'd think that truth is really highly valued or something.

Did the New York Times correct themselves with respect to the death of Officer Sicknick? Seems that I read somewhere that the Times claimed he was attacked with a fire extinguisher, and his head was bashed in. Did they correct it on Page One?

Seems to me that when they are wrong about something, their corrections are buried in the back of paper where hardly anyone will see it.

I wrote that Biden was a liar. So, if the following is wrong, I'll admit it. I think Biden was lying when he said that white supremacy is greatest threat to the homeland. The reason: Biden was citing a statistic that true for only a short period of time. You can find that tidbit on Bongino's show notes.

Biden should know better than that. He chose to use a stat that was true only for a short period of time in order to push an idea that he wanted to push. Almost like claiming a police officer had his head bashed in when it wasn't true.

Congresscritter Jerry Nadler said it was right and proper for Twitter to ban Trump for another two years because Trump is a liar. Maybe they ought to ban Biden too, if Nadler really cared so much about the truth. Maybe Twitter ought to ban itself, because it is supposed to be a neutral platform. They are decidedly political these days.

Also, the MSM won't apologize for getting it wrong about Fauci. Instead, the story is about how the GOP is "politicizing" the issue. Why shouldn't the GOP politicize it? Isn't that what they did themselves all this time? Is it not fair to return the fire that they started?

If you listen to them, you'd swear that they are never wrong about anything. Everybody else is the liar, but they are never wrong. ( Even when they are.)

The corruption has gone too far

 

Let's suppose that the government really is so corrupt that it cannot be fixed. Therefore, any attempt at a redress of grievances will lead nowhere. It will get you punished, instead.

Let's say all the ballot audits turn out to show without a doubt that the election was rigged. But instead of taking steps to fix that only leads to punishing results.

Let's say it is adjudicated until it reaches the Supreme Court, but the court does nothing.

In other words, all attempts at dealing with the situation fail, and nothing leads to any positive results, but the opposite. Then what?

If you think on this carefully, all of the above has already happened. Except the results of the audits, but do you really expect that to go anywhere? There are those that do, but when it doesn't, then what?

Trump's election was a redress of grievances, but look what is happening to him. If DeSantis takes his place, they'll do it all again. This is getting meaner and meaner. No question that this will lead to violence at some point. Wait! That already happened to Ashli Babbit. She was the only one to die of violence at an insurrection that didn't happen.

The situation has been compared to a casino, where the house always wins. But even a casino has to let the suckers win sometimes. We're at the point where the house can't stay in business if it lets the suckers win this time, because the suckers feel like the game is rigged. Even if the suckers "win" the house doesn't give up its chips.



Trump wasn't allowed a normal Presidency. If he had been, how many of these crooks would have been behind bars? Therefore, he couldn't have a normal Presidency. They impeached twice, and would have convicted, but the con-artists in the GOP couldn't run their own con if they convicted an obviously innocent man.

They have gone so far with their frauds and corruption that anything is now possible for them. It is so because the stakes have gotten that high. Didn't Hillary say that they would all hang if Trump were to win the White House?

If that was true in 2016, then it certainly is true now. The crimes have piled up so high that "somebody will have to pay for this hanging".

Yeah, but who is THAT? Biden has practically declared war on all opposition. They are getting ready for what they must sense is coming. He sounds almost as if he is trying to start a civil war.

If the house cracks down, which looks like they will, then what? Swallwell as a candidate for President said that they would use nukes. Maybe it wouldn't be nukes, but it could be something like a weapon of mass destruction.

If so, then what? What if they already did? Then what?

Ivermectin News Just Keeps Getting Better

 

Just saw on Barnhardt site that Ivermectin may be helpful for treating cancer. Whoa! I coulda used some of this stuff ( maybe). Anyway, with all this good news about Ivermectin, where the hell has it been all this time?

Sure, you can know that the Medical Industry can be greedy just like so many others, but the info was out there. How come it seems to have been such a secret? ( Not to third-worlders, only in the "advanced" countries, like America. You know, the place with the free speech and everything.)

Blame it on the amygdala. That's the Cro-Magnon part of the brain that was needed to dodge Saber-toothed tigers. It isn't much use today, except to get pageviews and sell advertising at confiscatory rates.

As Yakov Smirnoff would say "what a country!" Only in America where there is no money to be made on a generic drug that you give away to poor countries can you get "better" treatment options that still don't work. ( And be able to win elections on that and still be a hero.)

Officer Tatum: "Tulsa Massacre was a BIG LIE"

One of the comments caught my eye. The black people affected were already offered money long ago. 

And Joe Biden is a Big Liar.

United States Beginning to Imitate 1935 Germany

This might well be traced to Obama's acceptance of the Democrat nomination for President in 2008. He gave the speech at night in the open area of a stadium. This was a technique that Hitler like to use, as he believed it made people more pliable to his will.

There are other disturbing signs and this linked article discusses them.

Gold-bricking on a globalist scale

 

Yesterday's post gave me the idea for this one. The link mentioned in it involved a tweet of Jeffery Goldberg, who was claiming to represent "free enterprise". Of course, it did no such thing, but the Goldberg's argument may be persuasive to many people.

His name is part of the idea. "Gold" as in Goldberg or Gold-bricking, is pertinent to what is going on here. He's making what appears to be an All-American Free-Enterprise liberty-loving appeal, but it is nothing of the sort. Goldbricking is the same kind of thing. The con substitutes a base metal, like tungsten, and plates gold on top of it. The idea is to fool people into accepting it as real gold.

But it is not real gold. It is a fake gold brick. The intention is one of a con-artist, to swindle you out of something. Likewise, Goldberg's argument is a swindle. It argues in favor of all those things we still recognize as good, and substitutes the base metal of socialism in its place. The idea is to keep you quiet and accepting of the swindle that is coming down the pike.

The people are being swindled out of their freedom. The Goldbricking Goldberg's on the so-called conservative side are helping the left swindle us out of our heritage. At some point, the switcheroo will occur, and what was once considered good will be considered bad, and vice versa. The con will have been successful.

Unless we wise up to it first. For some reason, the globalist and the trans-natonal socialists are teaming up to overthrow our Constitution in the same way that was done in Weimar Germany.

If history repeats itself, a massive inflation will come first. Then a strong man will arrive and begin a Holocaust.

Conservative Inc goes after DeSantis

Yeah, it is a distinction without a difference. An argument for vaccine passports is like having the corporations to do the government's dirty work. Saying that it is "free enterprise" is the distinction without the difference. What's the diff if the government did vaccine passports? Corporations become a branch of the government.

So Florida Governor DeSantis does the opposite, and the "Conservative, Inc." chorus jumps into action in support of vaccine passports. But they want to chime in that it is free enterprise. Phooey.

There are concepts called "de jure", meaning "by law" and de facto, which means whats it looks like. If you support corporations doing the work of governments, then it is de facto vaccine passports. "Conservative Inc." is wrong to say that it is free enterprise. They claim "de jure" even though it isn't any difference than having the government doing the dirty work themselves. The "facts on the ground" tell you what is really going on.

It just so happens that Twitter, Facebook and the rest of Big Tech are doing the bidding of those who want to shut down the First Amendment in this country. According to the link , they weren't opposed to the lockdowns, and they probably aren't big fans of the First Amendment either, because they are just sucking up the left. Trying to confuse people with symbolic emptiness is just a sham.

Conservative Inc isn't conservative. If you want freedom, then by golly act like it. Otherwise, you are just playing word games.

"Give you something to fix""

Limbaugh featured this scene on his TV back in 92 or 93. He opined that the liberals think this way about conservatives.

It struck me as the same thing that they are trying to say about the people who went to DC to protest the 2020 election on Jan 6th. There may have been hundreds of thousands of people there that day who were peacefully protesting. They were harmless.

But the lunatics in DC are trying to portray those people in the same way that the character in this film is like. The character in this film cracks up, and goes on a rampage all through the town. He leaves behind some dead bodies and a lot of destruction before a retiring cop shoots him at the end.

But it doesn't do a whole lot of good to argue a point with somebody who refuses to listen. In the end, you could get a whole lot of normal people who could snap in an instant the way that this guy did.

That is what you call an argument for free speech. Allow people to express their grievances, or you will end up with the monster type personality in this movie. Only it may be repeated who knows how many times in a society being driven to madness.

The people that came to DC on Jan. 6th weren't like this character in the movie. Even this character played by Michael Douglas, wasn't evil per se. He did some questionable things, but he wasn't evil. But the people who went to DC were by and large good people. There may have been some questionable things, but there were questionable things all around.

A commission won't find what really happened and why. That's the last thing they want. No, a commission will only confirm them in their lies. The real purpose is to get people to disarm and to shut up. They don't want any dissent at all. That includes the GOP who continues to assist the Democrats in their attempts to silence all opposition.

GOP must be reformed

Gov. Ducey of Arizona has vetoed an election integrity bill. Polls have shown support for election integrity, so Ducey isn't following that. What is he following then? Probably MONEY.

Somehow or another, these corrupt politicians are going to have to be removed. The system as it is does not do the job. Perhaps he hasn't noticed that his neighbor is Collyfornia is under fire.

But the whole point of opposing election integrity is to maintain the corrupt politicians in office.

Gavin Newscome in Californicatia is likely to remain then. Even if he removed, someone better is not likely to replace him. The system there is probably as bad as it gets.

The usual channels for accountability are being blocked. The situation on the ground is likely to get worse. What reason is there for it to get better?

There's a lot of "hope" for the GOP, but Ducey's veto is not encouraging. The clock is ticking and there's not much happening. That which is happening is being swept away just like this election integrity bill. It's happening even though they are supposed to be opposing the Democrats, not helping them. Something's got to change.

David v Goliath

 

Ivermectin came to my attention back in February. A search of the blog is available to find all posts related to the subject, or any subject for that matter. Look for it on the left sidebar.

CTH had an article discussing Ivermectin. Instapundit had a post up this morning about it. The word is getting around. It has taken more than six months, but the news blockade is being defeated.

But I saw it all first on Barnhardt. Just giving credit where it is due. The part I read on CTH yesterday was mentioned on Barnhardt days ago. She's ahead of the curve.

Anyway, the story linked mentions the Biblical story of David and Goliath. Funny thing is that I looked up the Biblical story earlier yesterday before reading it again in the links provided on CTH on Ivermectin. Quite the coincidence.

There is a religious aspect to this, as much as many folks may want to brush that aside. It is about truth in an age of deceit. There are those who would lie to your face while swearing up and down that they are telling the truth.

Here's truth for you: either Ivermectin works or it doesn't. It has been recognized as an effective treatment for other illnesses. Someone won a Nobel Prize for its development, or so I read. The drug is safe and effective. It has few side effects. Even if it didn't work for COVID, it won't hurt you.

But it also is a generic drug. It was developed decades ago, and the patent has expired. There is no money in it. MONEY. That is the word. Money is motivator here for the lying. Too much money to be gained or lost. So the truth must be buried under an avalanche of propaganda.

Those who swear up and down that they are telling the truth have a lot to lose if this drug continues to take over their markets. There is a lot of money to be made in death and suffering. But Ivermectin is cheap, so there's no money there. The end of Covid also means the end of the political operation to take advantage of the "pandemic".

The doctor who testified in the Senate about Ivermectin, Dr. Kory, is no conservative. It would seem that the political left has tossed EVERYTHING overboard in their quest for power. Even one of their own. Instead of embracing this, and one of their own, they sought to discredit him. All of the Democrats boycotted the Senate appearance of Dr. Kory.

Democrats have long claimed to be the champion of the average man. But this mistake was no honest mistake. They have sided with the folks that they continue to demonize in order to make political gains. They have a lot to lose if there was no death and suffering from this "pandemic". The effectiveness of this drug was known long before Dr. Kory's appearance before the Senate.

But it has been smothered under the propaganda. You know it wasn't any honest mistake because there was a twin motivation---- power and money.

It has been a fight for truth against the modern day Goliaths. Ivermectin may prove to be the "rock" that slays this Goliath. The Davids are its supporters. It is the truth versus the lie. Who wins?

It looks like Goliath may be stumbling and on his way down. But this enemy is resourceful. It is by no means over yet. Look for them to start trying to cover their tracks and to memory hole their opposition to this drug. You have to know the enemy you are fighting. The enemy is the spirtual enemy of man, which would be Satan. The father of all lies, according to the Gospels.

You can believe that, or you can believe the liars. Which will it be?