Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
If you read the lefty sites, they really believe they have Trump on the ropes. What is the true situation here? The polls are steady, the markets are steady, the economy is steady, and the hype isn't gaining traction. There was a CNN article's headline that says there's no backlash yet. Are they expecting one? Are they saying that this type of situation, if it were true, is a positive? Jennifer Rubin seems to be addressing GOP types, as if the elected official's opinions are the only ones that matter. Romney is beclowning himself. Perhaps Susan Collins and another one may join the Dems, but they aren't helping themselves. Does Susan Collins really believe that this helps her? Trump won a delegate in the EC in 2016. The Blue model is not as uniform as the propaganda would have you believe. We'll see what's what. I choose to believe what I see, not what these people say.
Meanwhile, the county wide voting in the big cities in Texas will destroy the integrity of the vote, and the Dems will steal Texas.
This one caught my eye, so I'll put it up here. Always good to know this kind of stuff. My rule is to always eat everything on the plate NOW, and don't put leftovers in the fridge. Just eat it up when it's around. And don't let it hang around long. A good rule in order to avoid some bad situations.
Yep. It fleshes out what we already knew. Once again, I'm glad to hear it, but it only tells us what we should have known already. I don't want to discourage this, but rather shorten the learning curve. We've seen these stunts before. They shouldn't work anymore. Yet they still do. Even if only for a few days. Those few days may be all they need to prevail.
Sketchy Inspector General Michael Atkinson Admits 'Whistle-blower' Never Informed Him of Contact With Schiff Committee... https://t.co/rtjFSUIH0U via @thelastrefuge2
This guy Crowder says he was wrong about Trump. He's now on the Trump train. Better late than never. But there are still the "never-Trumpers". Maybe I'll be the opposite of the never-Trumpers. Not that I'm necessarily always-Trumper, but a never-GOP'er. I was never-GOP'er before never-GOP'er became cool. Or not cool, or whatever.
In the movie Braveheart, the modes of thinking is reflected in Robert the Bruce's dear old daddy. Daddy compared uncompromising men to dogs, and made the quote in the title above. That view is that treachery makes a man 'better'. That tells you a lot about who and what they are.
One more thing, and I think I'll let this go for now. Of course, I'll refer to it again in the future, if events or thoughts return to it. The jist of this post is that the truth is a slippery thing. This is true in theology as well as in science. If you wish, you could believe that another person is deliberately leading you astray. But that may not be the truth. The truth is out there, waiting to be discovered. Maybe that person really is trying to lead others astray, but on the other hand, maybe not. That too is a truth, but the truth may be hard to uncover. So much for now.
10.4.19:
The reason I'm revisiting this post is that a bit of confusion about something with respect to what has been referred to as "the rapture". There is a concept discussed as "Pre-Millenialism" which is discussed in the series on YouTube, to which this post refers. I found it persuasive at the time, now I am not quite so sure. Why? Well, there is the source of the confusion. Something else came to my attention which also seems persuasive, and it appears to support the "rapture". Well, what to think about that one? For an answer to the questions, I will embed the video by McDade, and let's see if this is as persuasive as it was before. Of course, by the time I post this, I have reviewed the video, and let's say the answer is still not clear. However, something else may be. If a nation, such as Israel, loses its favor from God ( let's call it Grace ), then it will be destroyed. The Romans smashed the Jewish state in AD 70, and sent the Jews to the far corners of the then civilized world. The Romans in turn, were also smashed into ruins. My question is who's next? The United States? Why would America be smashed? The answer I will not attempt to give here. Note: McDade doesn't say anything like what I've just written. That is my take on what I have seen.
10.3.19:
Funny thing is that I have been looking up on this subject this very day. Notice the dates. This post is exactly 4 years old this very day. Perhaps there is no significance, but still quite a coincidence. Er... now I noticing that the tine is also very close. Just 5 minutes apart. Woof!
10.3.15:
Note: As of this writing, I haven't made notes of the first 4 videos. Whatever I wrote about this was covered in prior posts. It also should be noted that I didn't have much to write about that either.
Note: Gary McDade appears to be following Revelation pretty closely. However, he adds a great deal of commentary and criticism of those who have a different interpretation than his. Since he stays so closely to the text, and gives citations to other portions of the New and Old Testaments, I'd say he has significant credibility. Since he points out those who do not follow Scripture, I'd say ( without double checking that for accuracy) that his criticism of them is probably correct.
Note: ( after watching 16 videos, with a possible 3 more to view, and having finally read the entirety of the Book of Revelation) Without double checking all references for accuracy, I'm going to give a judgment that McDade is most likely correct. Therefore, it is to be recommended for those like myself who needed some guidance in understanding the Book of Revelation, and some motivation for finishing the reading if you have started, but cannot finish reading it.
Part 9 Begin taking notes.... up to here, the sealing of the saints. Not clear about whether these people are dead or still alive. Most likely dead and in heaven because they stand before the throne of God. However, what of the 4 angels that would hurt the Earth and were held back by the angel with the seal of God until those who would receive the mark so that they would not be hurt? Must be referring to the Church and its living members.
Review of prior material. Study outline. Beginning of 9th chapter of Revelation. Locusts that punish the non-believers. Torment of them, but not kill them. "Fate worse than death". Reference to the seal of the saints. Again---most of this video slams Pre-Millenialism. Calvinism introduced. Said to rob men of their free moral choice.
Review as written above. The mighty angel and the little book. John was told to eat the book that was sweet as honey, but bitter to the stomach. Not the only mention of such a thing in Scripture. Again---video criticizes Pre-Millenialism most stringently. Discussion of the Kingdom of God meaning the Church.
Usual review of prior videos. Discussion of Chapter 11. "Truth has fallen in the street." City of Sodom and Egypt---places of wickedness---linked with Imperial Rome? ---- then Babylon , a place where God showed his wrath. This sums up the story. The rest of the story is retold---"oversimplication". Much of Christendom believes some form of Pre-Millenialism, it seems.
Usual review. Discussion. Beginning of retelling the story. ( see above ) The criticism of Pre-Millenialism: Daniel's prophecy quoted: "to the time of the end" means end of prophecy--AD. 70, not the end of time. Distinction being made is not insignificant. 95% believe of some form of PM ( Pre-Millenialism )...
Mark of the beast. The beast and the false prophet. Later in the video, he compares the persecution of Christians in the early church and compare it to the "false" Christians who "fought" the Muslims in the Crusades. No reference to the word "anti-Christ" in Revelation. The Beast is not "the anti-Christ". ( conflicts with the movie "Damien Omen"---popular culture.) The Beast that John refers to is the Roman Emperor or Emperors, who persecute the church.
"Wrath of God" is the same in the New Testament as it is in the Old. Nothing has changed. That's not what you hear today when you hear it described in the popular culture. You hear that the wrath of God is Old Testament stuff, and that the New Testament isn't. Another thing found to be false. God of love is just as true. There is no mutual exclusivity.
Will publish at this point, and add the rest of any comments as updates, if necessary
( Update if necessary ):
Update:
Yes, I think it is necessary to review something that caused confusion in Part 8 written about in an earlier post. I looked for how this could be understood, with the confusion removed, and it appears that the seventy weeks of years was an artifice of the PMs ( Pre-Millenialists ). I could not find it in Daniel, and the review of the video shows that it isn't in Daniel either. Therefore, it must have come from the PMs. But wait, it is in Daniel somehow, as McDade says it is indeed 490 years. Okay, then, I cannot find it. The confusion remains. It must be the historical record of what actually happened with the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD 70, and then having the years reckoned back in time towards Daniel's prophecy. But, I cannot find it in Daniel itself. Only "70 weeks" is found. Not "weeks of years".
Battle of Armageddon is said by the Pmers to start here, but doesn't until a few chapters later. The "bowls of wrath" are still to be poured out. McDade exaggerrates human capabilities for destruction when he says that there are enough nukes to split the Earth in half. ( not a chance ) The rest of the video refers to the Pmers, which isn't necessary for me. I'm moving on.
This is the continuation of the feedback post, which was begun last week. This original post is wiped, and the contents are swept into an archived post. For the week of 9.14 to 9.21: The weekly most popular post was Texas not going blue. For the month beginning on that same day, it was Judge Judy.
10.4.19:
Daily Update:
6:23 pm:
I do have a page offering Free Advertising, but no spam is allowed on comments. Just a clarification there. Sometimes it is a bit of a gray area in order to determine what is spam. Anyway, why would anybody want to do spam when free advertising is offered? No response has been given on the freebie, so again, what I am supposed to think? What would be the point?
8:33 am:
The Feedback feature was taken down, but I did just now receive some useful feedback that helped correct something that needed attention. I think my policy regarding comments may seem more restrictive than it really is. I should point out that I have allowed comments that didn't provide actual names. But they did have an identity. If fully anonymous comments is what people seek, then that still will not be allowed. Some anonymity is permitted, but keep in mind that the creation of an identity can be more easily traced. Anyway, I'll go back to Forrest Gump mode and say that's all I have to say about that.
Feedback can occur in more ways than one... by the way.
9.23.19:
I'm late this morning. There was a flat tire on the van, so I had to take care of that in the morning before it gets hot. There could be an entirely separate post on this flat tire thing. But let's keep it germane. It looks like Judge Judy is trending again. So what is it about Judge Judy that gets so much attention? Is it because she is no-nonsense? If our government had more of these, maybe we would have a little reason to be optimistic. If liberalism is anything, it is organized idiocy. They can organize all right, but they don't have a lick of sense.
As of the morning of 9.22.19: There has been a change of the weekly post to the one about UK police seizing the computer of the AGW skeptic who broke the Climate 2.0 scandal. Most of the audience is overseas lately. Is that topic really that popular over there? Daily Update: Electricity consumption post is trending. Is it trending because of AGW agitation?
There was a vote earlier this week, since I remember that Justin Amash was reported to be the only GOP member to vote for it. If that wasn't an impeachment inquiry, what was it? This link to an article on the Hill says that there is no formal impeachment inquiry. No vote was taken on one of those. ( according to the article ) If it isn't, then what the heck is it that they voted on?
5:00 pm:
Is this a real impeachment? It seems that I wasn't clear on this, and I'm still not clear on it after this show. Did they hold a vote in the House or not? If not, then there isn't any basis for what the Dems are doing on impeachment. It isn't even an impeachment inquiry. It's a fake. According to the view on the video. I'm not clear on what exactly happened. The end of the show, he seems to go into this part that says he thinks we are living in crazy times. It could easily devolve into something like that. The key is to keep you wits about you. It reminds me of a joking type skit, where a normal guy keeps getting badgered by this nutcase who wants to rent a chicken to him. The guy starts normal, then after being pestered beyond endurance, the once normal guy goes nuts. Moral: Don't let them drive you nuts with this stuff.
Looky here! Pelosi talks about things having nothing to do with Ukraine, but didn't she say the impeachment inquiry was only going to be about Ukraine?!? She wouldn't be lying now would she???? If I am wrong, then maybe I am confused about something. But it does appear to me that she said it was only going to be about Ukraine.
Understand what the Speaker is saying here. It’s yet another example of the Democrats accidentally revealing their true intentions behind impeachment.
This is a thinly veiled attempt to overturn the 2016 election—and prevent Trump from being re-elected in 2020. https://t.co/16AvbhZc4n
Democrats say it doesn't matter how they got the info, because the POTUS has "confessed". The tweet below is not a confession. As usual, the liberals get it wrong. By accident or design, these guys almost always get it wrong. When I say "almost", I am being generous. Okay, back to Forrest Gump mode.
This isn’t about a Campaign, this is about Corruption on a massive scale! https://t.co/DOCvfM8eqi
Well, now. Either this is true or it isn't. The leadership in Collyfornia is disputing what the EPA has said about good 'ol Frisco. aka Sodom and Gomorrah. Coming to a state near me. Yikes.
Somebody on Twitter denied that the 9.30.19 video is of LA. Do they deny this video as well? Texas will likely turn blue because of county wide voting. It encourages cheating. No way to police it.
Mr. President,
I had to come from the East Coast to Los Angeles &
we picked up 50 tons of trash at a homeless encampment.
Somebody on the twitter thread was claiming that this is not California. However, we know that there are some trashy places in our large cities, and this appears to be in line with that common knowledge. Obviously, there are a few questions. One, if the author proves its true, would you apologize publicly? As for my putting this up, if it is proven without a doubt that this was a fabrication, then I will be happy to apologize. I don't want to believe that this is California, but I've heard too much that convinces me that it almost certainly is true. Besides, there are twitter cops out there trying to steer the conversation away from this. If it were true, they may want to raise doubts that it is indeed true. If the proof is out there, then produce it.
11:00 am:
Just made a video of this video. Yes, but it won't be public. It is unlisted, because YouTube will take it down and probably kill my account if I put it up publicly. They may do it anyway, come to think of it. I did not get permission to use the media in the video. But that runs rampant on YouTube. They'll only enforce it on people they don't like. Sound familiar? Anyway, without further adieu, here she is.
Just want to show this tweet, and correlate it with what I saw on Free Republic just now. First, the tweet.
3rd world country?👇
Nope, it’s California. You know, the “Golden State”...golden now refers to feces & urine pouring n2 the streets, flowing n2 the Pacific Ocean.
Now for what I saw on Free Republic. Because of the most populous counties in Texas have decided to go to COUNTY WIDE VOTING, the majority of Texas' votes will be cast this way in the future. Boom! In one fell swoop, the Republic has been overthrown. Why? This increases the probability to near 100% that there will be election fraud. The old system kept the enforcement of elections laws within the precinct where the votes were cast. Thanks to this, that authority will be rendered moot. Now the state's most populous counties have usurped that authority, and turned it over to Democrat controlled population centers. All in the name of Democracy. Yet, Democracy is not what you people will get. You will get a one-party state. Just like Collyfornia, with the images like the one above coming to a place near you!!!! Red Alert! Well, honestly you people. It looks like this was inevitable anyway. You cannot keep a Republic when the entire country has gone bad. It is like the Biblical Story of Sodom and Gomorrah here, folks. Honest people are about to be overthrown in favor of the criminal element. God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. We will be destroyed as well.
Of course, the enablers in the GOP are telling Trump to shut up because he quoted a pastor who might have said something quite similar. The pastor said we are headed to a civil war, or something to that effect. I have to look up the reference, so I will do that and pause now... Okay, back... (I added the links above.) It shows how the GOP enables this evil, and all Trump did was to point out the obvious. But it is the truth, and you cannot speak the truth anymore in this country. The GOP will not help save the Republic. They will only fool people into believing that they will. I'm sorry to say that there is no stopping this. It's war or surrender. But the GOP fools people, so the people will stay asleep until it is too late.
Making videos seems an interesting diversion to me, but it is rather time-consuming.
Even writing posts are time-consuming. Not the writing itself, the research that goes into it. I call it research, but it is just cruising around the web.
Anyway, posting will be light. I'll leave the commentary on this.... latest.... whatever to others.
Now that I have some time to catch up a bit, I have another thought. Here is someone with a different opinion than mine with respect to the markets. I got about a third of the way through it before I thought: WRONG! Recessions aren't just market events anymore in an economy that is so dominated by the government. If the stock market tanks, people are going to feel the losses. When they do, they are going to be apt to blame someone. Most likely, they will blame Trump. That has been the history here. The public tends to side against the guy even on the most flimsy of accusations. If the Democrats believed what this opinion writer said, or thought that they would be blamed, then why would they do something like this? Of course they think they will benefit. That is why they are doing it! Either the Dems are wrong or they are right. I am inclined that on this point, the Dems are more right than wrong. On about everything else, I think they are wrong. That means that there is no merit to their accusations. It doesn't mean that impeachment is warranted when I say that they are right. It means that they have at least a 50-50 chance of succeeding with their stunt. As usual, conservative types ( including me ) tend to think in terms of our superior arguments. But as I have noted again and again. Arguing with the wolf is a waste of time. The public isn't inclined to sacrifice their comforts for such niceties as freedom and the Bill of Rights. If they do, we wouldn't have gotten to this point.
2:00 pm:
I think it is the third Red Alert I have posted.
Why now?
The stock market is going down now. The stock market is volatile. It will move on uncertainty like this. It could result in big paper losses. What does that all mean? It introduces the sense of stress on the system.
As mentioned, the polls seem steady. But will they hold steady as this intensifies? I am guessing that is what the Democrats have played for.
It is an alert because the system cannot endure for a long period of time such a state of uncertainty. The uncertainty is what is stressing the markets, and that in turn is what will distress the public.
The Dems know this, and that is what they are playing for. They are making outrageous demands, and if they are not met, these will be added to their articles of impeachment. How long they will play this out depends on timing, I suppose.
What can the President do? He is pretty much at the mercy of the Establishment in DC. Basically, this is an coup against the public. The public elected this man, but the Establishment won't let him be President. Nor will they let him win another 4 years. For if he does, that will be the ruin of them, and they know it.
It is an open question as to whether or not he can keep enough support in the Senate in order to avoid removal from office. That makes two questions.
Finally, they will do everything within their power to steal the election. That is already been demonstrated here in Texas.
It is now nearly 2pm in the Central Time Zone USA. I have been away from the screen for the past 2 hours or so. I have not had the opportunity to read the most recent developments.
I hope so too! | “The AG...is going to look at a lot of documents. ...I hope he looks at the UK...Australia...Ukraine. I hope he looks at everything. Because there was a hoax that was pepetrated on our country.” | pic.twitter.com/9kk3EwXzEN
I've been tracking the Rassmussen poll since this miscalled "scandal" erupted. It has caused only a slight blip in the POTUS' approval ratings. Of course, this could all change, but the event is now old enough to get a feel for what its effect is. So far, not that bad...
Language is the tool of thought and communication of those thoughts. If the language is faulty, the communication is faulty. Using their terminology, when faulty, is bad form.
Why call it "resistance"? Should not that also be questioned? If "resistance" is unlawful, then what does that make it? https://t.co/YbLKsuGt9i
The night time creepy crawlies are out there spinning their fables.
Then the seditionists are not following a standard. Consequently, the whistleblower term is not applicable. Call it malicious gossip, for that is what it is. https://t.co/mIbg0uZorC
I guess I shouldn't point fingers, but I am feeling pretty confident that this entire thing is going our way, or will start to go our way soon. But then I saw this... It is a reminder how deep this fraud is and deep its roots are. All these people know how to do is to lie, but they do it so well. It is a constant battle against their lies.
The Ukraine "controversy" is a pretext to start impeachment proceedings in order to obtain grand jury material from Mueller's investigation.
It is NOT about Ukraine.
The White House needs to get in front of this ASAP.
Government admits Flynn was not a Russian agent. Well blow me down! Gee, then why were they investigating him????? Now the government is saying that Flynn lied, but won't produce the evidence that shows that Flynn wasn't lying, either. Remember that one? The FBI 302's would be exculpatory evidence, since the Agents were said to have believed that he wasn't lying. Have we seen those? Basically, what this boils down to is that the government may have forced a false confession in order to taint the Trump Administration. It comes down to the Judge now.
Bongino talks about this on his show today. Bongino thinks it was a mistake, but what if it isn't? You have to think carefully on what this might mean in order to get the import of the question.
9.28.19:
The focus seems to have come upon this changed protocol that allows hearsay from so-called whistleblowers ( who blow ). CTH has some interesting things to say about the Intelligence Community Inspect General ( ICIG), Michael K. Atkinson. It seems like Atkinson is involved in some shady deals of his own. Read the article for details. It is familiar stuff. I file it under Obama Administration Skulduggery. An obvious question arises, but I won't mention that now. There's some scuttlebutt going round with respect to this very thought. It may be nothing, but who knows? "Get ready for a surprise!" Maybe.
It is almost as if they are coordinating with the Schiffty fellow in the House. There is really no justification for withholding exculpatory evidence. That alone should be grounds for dismissing the Flynn case. But why the hurry? The prosecution wants this now. Really? Why now? Keep in mind that the so-called whistleblower had the benefit of a shady last minute "rules change" so it could be designated as an "urgent matter" ( which the DOJ swatted down ). "Urgent matters" cannot be referred to Congress based upon hearsay. The DOJ just ruled that very recently in consequence of this stunt. Democrats must be worried about something.
The way that the objection to this is being handled is that it is too much work to ensure enforcement of the law. But that is just the half of it. The only way you have any hope of policing this is with computers. Harris County alone has 4.7 million people. It is the same story in other major population centers in the state. Now with respect to the computers: Does it really need explaining what could go wrong here? Nevertheless, I will try. Look, computers are a "black box". By black box I mean that you cannot see what is going on inside. This is ripe area for manipulation. What's to stop them from "finding" a million votes here and there if they need 'em? How can you possibly police this? Seriously, this is a really bad idea. No way this should be acceptable. Is this how the left steals elections in other states? Wouldn't surprise me after this one.
9.30.19:
The potential for fraud has just gone into warp drive, people. If anybody in Harris County ( Houston ), or Bexar County ( San Antonio ), or Travis County ( Austin ), and DFW and the respective counties there, can vote anywhere in that county that they please, how in Hades are you going to enforce the integrity of the process??????????????????????????????? It would be SO easy for multiple votes from people. Ballot box stuff will come to the Lone Star State. These days, up until this at least, the voter cast his / her vote in a precinct in which he/she lived. The precinct enforced the laws. The voter rolls were relatively small, and this task could be done with relatively low tech means. Don't try to tell me that high tech will fix this. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Please do not be stupid and fall for that. The reason and the only reason for this is that it will allow unlimited means for fraud. It is the only reason for doing it. The left will say it will make things more fair. As always with these EXPLETIVE DELETED suns of biscuit eaters to do this is to steal the schiffing election. Don't fall for the bovine scatology. Yeah, I am excited, and when I get excited the language gets a bit bad. Deal with it.
Furthermore, what happens in Texas has already happened in so-called Blue States. They might as well be called communist states. If you love your freedom, just be aware that one of the things that makes us free has just been taken away from you.
Amid concerns about technology and whether election officials are prepared, countywide polling places are coming to a majority of Texas voters on November 5. https://t.co/RV3XnWRcKz
Something I almost forgot, which I saw in the news. A Congresscritter from the state of Nueva Jork pled guilty of insider trading today. The significant thing, according the Wikipedia, was that Collins was the first Congresscritter to endorse Trump for POTUS. Somehow that makes Trump guilty. Super guilty, I suppose. Another thing is how all these convictions run just one direction: GOP. It is almost if the want to tell the world that only the GOP is capable of anything corrupt. As always, I am quite suspicious of that. Moreover, if they convicted everybody on Capitol Hill for being corrupt, there wouldn't be anyone left. That wasn't a joke, by the way.
A bit of a confession here. Texas politics just doesn't interest me very much. But this latest power grab by the Democrats has gotten my attention.
What to do when this stuff is too boring?
Well, not all of it is. Gun control is not boring to me. The Lt. Gov of this state has some questionable opinions about the topic. That is an attention-getter too.
Texas politics is a bit more tenuous than I thought. I took it for granted.
The governor race has been the focus of attention several times in the recent past. Dems have tried hard to win some statewide races, especially the Governor. But Texas does not have a strong governor. The stronger office is the Lt. Governor, oddly enough.
I'm sure that I have written about this before on the blog, but what the heck I can mention it again. The reason that the Texas Governor's office is relatively weak is that there was a governor who would not leave office. This was at the end of Reconstruction after the Civil War. After that governor finally left, Texas constitution was rewritten and the consequence was a much diminished governorship.
As for the subject of Texas as being too boring to write about, well screw that. Texas is the last bastion of freedom in America. We lose it here, it is totally lost. Once lost, it cannot be regained without shedding blood.
One thing that politicians seem to share is this desire for total immunity from accountability. Once that happens, the only way to change is for there to be revolution. This is very dangerous. Consequently, politicians are very dangerous by their very natures.
It has served this country well to have checks and balances. But that will be going away soon unless the Democrats are stopped. This power grab is an attempt at a permanent majority. This is a very improper goal. The seeking of it in itself is evidence of corruption, in my opinion.
Yep. That's what I think. Didn't make a comment on Twitter though. But again, it is all for nothing if Texas goes blue, and that is already in the cards. I hate to criticize Bongino, but he may be selling "hope-porn". I am not selling "despair porn" because I don't charge anything. You can get it here for free, if you think this is despair.
Dan Bongino: Dems Are Panicked Illegal Deep State Spying Will Soon Be Revealed 👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.co/Af9jIYqgen
While it may be true that nobody comes to this blog, it is also true that I rarely tweet my own messages on Twitter. Lately, I have started doing that. It is also interesting to note that there have been hang up phone calls. Just in case anybody of friendly orientation comes to this blog, please be aware that this may a type of "pressure" to get people to shut up about their nefarious plans. In other words, this may be a veiled threat. Can't prove it of course, since it was a hang up call. I suppose the real thing could occur eventually, maybe sooner rather than later. I am being tested. I am sure of that. If I point it out, I may well be gas-lighted next. I may be over the target and this is just the beginning of the flack. We'll see.
None of this is going to matter unless we have honest elections in this country. County wide voting in Texas is new development and is corrupt. It's purpose is FRAUD. https://t.co/252AnpkJJF
It all seems rather pointless now. Unless the State of Texas acts quickly to stop county wide voting, Texas will definitely turn blue. It won't be an honest election. It will be fraudulent. That's why they are doing it! What they are doing now is the wolf's argument to kill the sheep. The Ukrainian pretense is based upon the premise that Trump "pressed" Ukraine for political assistance in the coming election. The truth is that Joe Biden is guilty of doing that very thing himself. The Ukrainians voted against Joe Biden's boy by a margin of 3 to 1, and put the current president of Ukraine in power on the basis of anti-corruption. A dollar to a donut, you'll never hear that if you listen to the left wing. Anyway here's more, for all the good it may do. Texas will go blue unless the governor and all the RED office holders act to stop county wide voting in Texas. It is unenforceable by all means known to man. It's sole purpose is to STEAL TEXAS for the Democrats. Chew on that and read this tweet. Not that there is anybody out there doing it, because I have already spoken in person to a couple, and it goes right over their heads.
Reason #UkrainianWhistleblowers needed Counsel to provide evidence in US of breaking US law is that anti @realDonaldTrump US Ambassador was threatening them if they did so. Moreover, all whistleblowers need lawyers to help them navigate legal system effectively. #maga2020
What do you suppose is the average Joe's response to this impeachment blather? Well, I'm an average Joe. Why not? Why wouldn't I be an average Joe? I'm definitely not rich, definitely not influential ( r u kidding me!? this blog cannot buy pageviews) I'm thinking nobody really gives a poop about this Schiff except the political junkies. Maybe since I write about it, it means I'm not an average Joe after all. The average Joe doesn't give a poop. Now that I wrote that, what we really have here is a partisan food fight. (I'm a zit, get it??? lol.) Get this. The Democrats want to impeach because they think this helps them to win the upcoming election. Pelosi says they are willing to lose the election and the impeachment vote because it really isn't about impeaching, it is about winning the election, or something like that, or something. Get it? If you hold an impeachment trial, they figure they win. If you don't, they figure they win. How they figure these things is hard to fathom. Kamala Harris and others say that Trump has already confessed, but it doesn't sound like a confession to me. It is hardly a confession to a crime when the crime isn't specified, and the accusation amounts to a complaint about following the law! Trump is following the law when there is a probable cause to a crime having been committed. The Dems are claiming this manipulates the election, but how is holding a vote for impeachment for the sole purpose of manipulating an election any different? In other words, who is right? Seems to me that you have to specify the crime, which the Democrats refuse to do. What's Biden's crime? Conspiracy to solicit a bribe. Just for starters. Dueling accusations.. You decide.
If you have any doubts as to the truth of this matter involving Ukraine, ask yourself why would the Ukrainian people defeat Biden's boy 3-1 on an anti-corruption platform?
Poroshenko was known for his strong ties to the Obama Administration, specifically Obama's point man for Ukraine: pic.twitter.com/CvvcUas9lw
Here's Mukasey saying basically the same thing as the DOJ ruled on. It might help people understand that this isn't just Mukasey's opinion. It is the opinion of the DOJ. Another thing here. This is actually a scandal in itself. You had these guys change the protocols just so this could get into Congressional hands. Now it is being used as a justification for an impeachment "inquiry" which in turn hasn't been voted on in the full House.
note "wb" equal whistleblower
DOJ ruled that wb complaint wasn't urgent, didn't require Congress' involvement. Only first hand info makes that grade. Hearsay can be referred for investigation, but within DOJ. https://t.co/nasjdsVmih
Giuliani is contrasting his evidence as compared with the so-called whistleblower hearsay. Giulani has court documents from Ukraine. He says that they are online, but I haven't seen them as of this writing. You got something, which is what Giuliani has, versus nothing, which is what the Democrats have. Yet this thing still rolls on. Something's wrong here, boss. Just so nobody misunderstands. I believe Giuliani. What I am questioning is how does this accusation against Trump survive in the face of obvious truth?
Saw this on CTH, btw. Sundance titles it in a way that suggests conflict. She's not rubber stamping what Giuliani is saying. She is using a lot of devil's advocacy here. If you listen to the Dems, Fox is one-sided. I don't see that here.
The song is about her home town of Akron Ohio. "Where did it go?", she asks. Like the rest of America thanks to the Globalists--- to China. Yeah, and the Bidens get a billion or two for saying--- "China?, ya gotta be kidding me!" Or something to that effect. The worst deal since the Indians sold Manhattan for 26 bucks or something like that.
Now they want to impeach Trump because he sought to bring some of those jobs back. Nice going you guys. You know this thing they are screeching about is just a parking ticket type offense, if it was any offense at all. But that isn't the real reason that want Trump gone. They want to send all of America down the way they did to Ohio.
My ears don't work as they should. I need lyrics because I cannot pick it out from the sound alone. Anyway, I've heard the song lots of times. This is the first time I looked up the lyrics. Fascinating, said Spock.
This one is from Tony Bennett. I remember it from the Goodfellas flick. That gives me an idea. Anyway, one of my riders while I was Ubering in Austin town said that his son picked up Tony Bennett while Bennett was visiting the Austin area. Just thought of that, too.
