Well, I didn't figure out anything new. So here's something that may sound pretty old.
Today on the Bongino show, I heard a little about the Spygate scandal. Actually, some folks may dispute that it is a scandal, but to me, it has always been thus.
It seems that Christopher Steele had to produce some evidence from his sources, but he now claims that he doesn't have it. Bongino went on to remind listeners that he has always thought that it wasn't Steele's Dossier. That is to say that Steele never wrote it. It was Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS.
It all reminds me of a kid who didn't do his homework and tells the teacher that he left it at home. So the teacher says to bring it with him tomorrow, and all will be forgiven. The next day, Johnny tells the teacher that he doesn't have it again. This time he says that the "dog ate it". Yep, Steele is now telling us the equivalent of the dog eating the homework. For if Steele really had a story, he would want to keep a copy of it no matter what. When he had to prove his bonafides, then he would have a copy of it. Instead, he has no copy because there was no copy to begin with--- Just like little Johnny.
There will be those who will continue to deny the scam, of course. My question is why should people continue to believe them when they have no credibility? That would be the Democrats ( and their hand maidens, the media).
What I am referring to is their continuing dishonesty. It isn't just Spygate. It is everything--- all the time. We are now in the middle of this virus thing, and the quesiton is this-- how much of this is just made up BS?
It should be a fair question, but I suppose you can't ask it without getting hysterics.
