Vivek Ramaswamy interviewed on CNN

Comment:

First of all, the name is not what we'd been accustomed to seeing. So pardon me if I spelled it incorrectly. Secondly, he spoke very well. It is going to be difficult for the media types to pick fights with him. By the way, this is the same gal who "moderated" the Trump townhall on CNN recently.

He may have some problems with name recognition. But shoot, maybe we can use some new blood.

Also, one more thing. I saw this on Al Fin, but when I tried to share it on his blog, it was blocked. Don't know what that is all about, but I recall the Al Fin's blog on blogspot was taken down once upon a time.



Here's the video...

Dredging up some new links

 

Tennis champ refused COVID jab

Comment:

They tried to force this guy into taking the jab, and he refused. Not only did he not DIE, he has thrived... He is the tennis champ. But memories are short. The damage they did should have been punished, but has not been. It is likely to end up in the memory hole and forgotten. But this guy beat them in more ways than one. Good for him.

next link:



Fetterman on stage with Biden (Video)

Comment:

Here are the two prominent Democrats that supposedly won their elections and got themselves into office. Nobody will ever convince me that Biden got 81 million votes. As for Fetterman, this video speaks for itself. If Fetterman actually won that election, then the people of Pennsylvania should be ashamed of themselves.

Mass psychosis

 

Liberty Daily link to website with video

Comment:

Another video worth watching and thinking about.

The author talks of "menticide", which is the killing of the mind. It happens in totalitarian societies. Indeed, totalitarian societies drive their people crazy. It makes them incapable of thinking for themselves.

There are trends here that may be uncomfortable close to what is happening in this country today. In my opinion, and I must note that it wasn't mentioned in the video, the COVID madness is a prime example of how people's minds were driven into an irrational fear. The fear is what the totalitarians want and need for their designs to succeed.

I will always condemn what was done during the COVID madness period. Indeed, the public has been softened up for a new assault. If it follows the pattern shown in the video, we will have a calm period, followed by an even worse episode. In other words, we aren't out of this mess yet by any means. This may only be an early stage.

The author mentions some ways to fight back. In my opinion, fighting back is going to be hard. As I noted during COVID, it is a lonely struggle against the madness of the crowd. The totalitarians do their work well, and most people fall into their traps. In my opinion, you have to prepare yourself ahead of time. That's because the totalitarians never give up, and the sheep are too easily deceived.

The video is embedded below:

Saw this on The Liberty Daily

Update to post of 6/16/23

After watching all three of these videos, there is abundant evidence of something quite seriously wrong with our government. This should not be a surprise to most people, as the right-track wrong-track polls have been consistently negative for years on end now.

As with all such situtations, the question is what to do about it? It cannot go on like this because it is likely to lead to a break down.

The Republicans hold a majority in the House as of now. The Democrats have shown no hesitation in pursuing their political opponents. Why should the Republicans hold back on the same? This appears to be a way forward, but is it the right way?

On the other hand, if the Democrats keep going the way they are, won't they actually invite retaliation at some point? Here's another question for you... What if the idea is to invite retaliation? Perhaps there is a wish for things to break down, because that may create opportunities for those who have a quite different agenda than the one that is claimed.

There were some out there who fear that a second Trump presidency will invite retaliation for what they've put him through. But why put him through these things if you truly wish to not invite such retaliation. Such fears don't not seem sincere. All roads point to more of the same. If you want a different result, you start acting differently.

In other words, perhaps a break down is what is wished for. It isn't about "Democracy" and "rule of law", but something quite different.

In spite of all the rhetoric about "locking her up", Trump's administration did not go after Hillary. But it appears that Hillary and the Democrats went after Trump. Not only that, but they won't stop. Maybe they won't because they don't want things to settle down.

the original post of 6/16/23 follows below:

The Liberty Daily

Gateway Pundit: In Case You Missed It: Chanel Rion and One America News Broke Down the Biden Bribery Scandal with Testimony from Ukrainian Officials Back in 2019 (VIDEO)

This is a link to a 3 video series on YouTube, which was done back during the Impeachment Hoax in 2019-2020. What struck me is that the events of today have a link to all what has already happened. That is to say, the Russia collusion hoax was related to this, the Impeachment hoax was linked to this, as well as the Insurrection hoax, and now the indictment of Trump. The point is to run interference for any investigation of Biden.

I'm going to embed the 3 part video series. You can also see it at the Liberty Daily link above.

Rather than to break it all down and comment upon it, I'll leave that to the reader...

Each video is about an hour long.  I've only watched one of these.  Even that one video is incredible.

There is more at the Gateway Pundit link above.

  

Dog peed on geo-fence data of pipe bomber, but not for anybody else

 

J6th pipe bomber?

The story involves the "geo-fencing" data that was used to round up people at the Capitol Building on January 6th. The claim is that they cannot identify the pipe bomber with that data, even though they could with a lot of other people. Bongino discussed that yesterday, by the way.

That's pretty curious. But here's something unrelated. The geo-fencing technique is what the documentary "2000 Mules" discussed to identify cheaters in the 2020 election. For some reason, you can't use it for identify election cheaters, but the FBI can use it to track people at the Capitol on January 6th.

Did the DOJ obtain convictions using this geo-fencing? It seems like what the "fact checkers" say doesn't add up.

Of course, the pipe bomb case is worth a read as well. Just wanted to note the myriad contradictions.

Welcome to post truth America. That's all for this post.

Et tu, Ann Coulter? Updated

 

6-16-23:  Et tu Ann Coulter Update:

See comment 68



Comment:

CTH mentioned this recently. Not the pic, but the reference to the event. The event is the genesis of the entire "case" being brought on Trump regarding so called "classified documents". They dumped the records on the White House parking lot, and forced Trump to take possession of them. Then, they ginned up a complaint that Trump had documents that he wasn't supposed to have.

FAKE!!!

The entire indictment is ginned up out of the clear blue sky. Where have we seen this before???

Better yet, when will people like Ann Coulter ever learn? Or, just exactly WHO is Ann Coulter? Here's a video of Coulter predicting that Trump would win in 2016. She was laughed at. But that doesn't necessarily mean she was onboard with Trump. It was just a prediction. I don't see advocacy for Trump in what she predicted at that time.

original 6-15-23 post below:

Ann Coulter on indictment

She's never-Trumper now, and maybe she's always been for all I know. Somewhere down the line, she lost me. She's like a lot of folks that gotten on my fecal roster. You can stop being on that roster by stopping the a-hole stuff.

My view on the indictment is that it is probably fake. So many things are these days. Who's to believe anybody anymore? On things like this, I'd say the track record is what counts the most. Ann Coulter acknowledges that Trump's critics got it wrong before, but this time's different.

But why? Why is this time any different than before? Instead of listing the reasons, she goes off on Trump supporters. It's as if we're like the Democrats now. She thinks Trump supporters could care less if Trump broke the law. It's an insult. If she really respected the people she's trying to convince, she'd list why this time is different from the other times. But she doesn't. It's probably because it isn't, but she doesn't like Trump. Maybe that makes it different.

While accusing Trump supporters of repeating what they've heard, she repeats what she's heard. If she's heard more, and has solid reasons for what she believes, then why not share them? I didn't see anything compelling here.

She has staked out a position that's in opposition to Trump. Fine. Go for it. But don't hang an argument upon sources that have been less than reliable in the past.

As for a process crime, then why not hold the Democrats responsible for following the process? If they can nail Trump on a process crime that they know has no basis in evidence, then they can do this to anyone anytime. Should they really be able to do this? They've forfeited any reason at all to take them seriously. She admits that herself, yet she does it anyway. But she doesn't like Trump. Well, boo hoo.

I could say more, but I'll leave it at that.

The Democrats don't have the evidence. If they did, they'd have shown it already. REAL evidence would sink Trump. Nobody wants a fool in the White House, unless it's Democrats. Nobody wants a traitor in the White House, except Democrats. Just because you don't like Trump doesn't mean you have to join THOSE guys. Those guys have already shown many, many times that they'll say ANYTHING. Why would any serious person be willing to join them?

Will Scharf, former Asst. US Atty: "Indictment is outrageous and shocking"

 

I am a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, worked on two Supreme Court confirmations, and clerked for two federal appellate judges.

The indictment and case against President Trump is outrageous and shocking.

But let’s get into the details.

Here are my 6 key points on the case:

— Will Scharf (@willscharf) June 15, 2023

What is Politics Schmolitics?

 

It is my distaste for politics. Look, it can be considered like any duty that is distasteful and unpleasant. I could shirk it, and often do, but doing so doesn't improve the situation. Likewise, to bitch about it here may not do anything to help, but at least I can TRY. So I try.

There was a vote to censure Adam Schiff recently. CTH had a write up about it. I'd like to address it as well. You see, if there was ANYONE who needed to face accountability, it's that guy. Yet, the GOP won't do it. This is what is wrong with the GOP in a nutshell. The problem with the GOP is that they PRETEND to be an opposition party, but in reality, they are not. Peeling it back further, like an onion, you find layer after layer of deceit. This was just another fake in a long series of fakes.

Schiff is a point man for the Democrats in their attacks upon Trump. Donald Trump is the most popular leader of the GOP. He is the leader of the party, yet the GOP won't defend him. What does that tell us?

One thing it tells us is that the opposition to Trump isn't based upon anything that they say it is. That's because the problem with Schiff is his dishonesty. If the GOP cared anything about what they claim that they care about, then there would be 100% unity in censuring Schiff. The GOP isn't about Democracy. But neither are the Democrats. If it really was, they could find REAL reasons to oppose Trump. But they cannot find REAL reasons. They have to make up phony "reasons". By supporting Schiff, there were at least 20 GOP House members who were willing to vote for what Schiff did with his phony charges against Trump. The GOP is no more honest than what Schiff was. I say at least 20, because I suspect that there are more. The idea isn't about anything they say it is about. So the 20 isn't likely to be the real number anyway. Everything is a fake. This vote about Schiff was probably fake too.

To put it in a word, it is all about fakery. The idea is to deceive the public. Therefore, nothing that they say is what it really is. It's a fake. If it weren't fake, there would have been a censure. But they need to show opposition to Schiff, and this is what they do. A fake vote to achieve a fake result. It's all a show.

I've included pics of two of the twenty here. Each of them seem to have leadership roles. That's even worse. For if there was anything that a leader should be doing is leading. Do they really want to send the message that Schiff is somebody worth listening to? Is that the message the leadership wants to send? If it is, then they need to be held accountable for this.

Kay Granger, Texas' 12th District,  US House

 

Member of Liberty Caucus.

If "We the People" cannot get what we think we are voting for, then what reason can we expect for things to get any better? The GOP continually runs for office as if they are presenting a choice that we could have with respect to the Democrats. But if they won't actually oppose the Democrats, then what's the point? The point is that they aren't there to oppose, but to pretend to oppose. If they won't oppose the Democrats, shouldn't we find others who will?

There was a TED talk about deception that is appropriate to mention. It was about lying. People get lied to because they let themselves be deceived. So the question I posed is this: When will "We the People" stop letting ourselves be deceived? If this vote was anything, it yet another in a long line of deceitful acts. The only way to stop it is to hold those responsible for it to account. Not to PRETEND to. If they won't hold the likes of Schiff to account, then we get what we deserve if we don't hold those who pretend to hold him to account. In short, the lies have to stop. They can only be stopped if "We the People" decide that enough is enough.

But it is likely not going to make any difference. It isn't pleasant nor fun to do this. I'd rather believe that leadership has our best interests at heart, but it doesn't appear to be the case. Listening to others complain about it doesn't mean a thing if nobody is willing to do something to change it. What would that be? At least stop sending these people to Congress. Their replacements might not be any better, but it will at least be some sort of accountability. After all, the price of liberty is eternal vigilance. But you'd think that is what leadership was about, but the leadership isn't there right now. We have to accept the fact that the leadership isn't with us. A failure to respond is exactly what they want, and it is exactly what they should not receive.

Dan Bongino, 6-14-23

If you've got the time, this video is a must see.

There's always more to learn about this situation that is now developing, and I learned a few things myself. I figured I was keeping up pretty well, but maybe not.

So, there may be a chance that you'll see something you haven't seen before. Well worth the time.

Hectic day

 

Getting toward the end of the day, and so I can take some time out now, and write a little more about what's been going on around here.

Since I got out here in the boondocks, internet service has been through the cell phone. There were other ways of getting service, but I chose to get it that way. The reason was that it was more economical. It so happens that prices must have gotten better, because I got a deal to get broadband another way.

I cannot specify what this service is, but it does need a dish. So there's a dish now. What I mean is that I don't think that it is satellite, but I'm not sure. Maybe it is or maybe it isn't. I don't care if it is satellite or not, frankly. So, I didn't ask.

But from the way the dude was talking, I think it isn't satellite, for what that's worth.

It looks like this will be a more capable system as well. That's good because the cell phone was a bit limited. Especially on the hot spot service. If you wanted to use the hot spot, you could easily run out of data, as it was a limited amount. It was limited even though it was supposed to be unlimited. The hot spot service aspect was rather crappy, so this should be a big improvement.

It so happens that my service was out. A message says I'm out of data, but I don't think so. I watch it pretty carefully. Rather than go through that anymore, I decided to get this service. The cell phone service is still there for the time being, but may go away soon. I'll still need a phone, just not much broadband on it.

So there it is. For several days, there was no service. Now there is. I didn't have access to the blog because of there needs to be a hotspot. The reason for that is another story. Let it suffice that I couldn't access the blog, so I couldn't do any blogging. It all happened without notice, so there wasn't any way to communicate it here. Or should I say, no easy way.

Now it should be back. I hope so. So far, so good.

Trump indictment should be thrown out

According to this, the President can keep what records he wants to, and the government can't do anything about it. If that's true, the case should be thrown out because there has been no violation of the law.

Analysis Trump indictment

Starship Update

 

Recovery from technical difficulties

 A short message to advise that the blog is still active.  It has been down due to connection

problems.  This post should be taken as definite progress being made to get back online.