FBI Agent Who Interviewed Gen. Flynn Played Critical Role in Trump Campaign Investigation

Lying FBI Agent Who Interviewed Gen. Flynn Played Critical Role in phony Trump Campaign Investigation 

It was Agent Pientka that the author of the piece, Jeff Carlson, is talking about.

Rogue cops and Spygate--- what's the diff?

The cops in this movie abuse their position.  Supposedly, it is for the public good.  But anybody can say that.

The Spygate crew will say the same.  They'll deny it until they are caught, then they'll act like this scene.  The scene starts with the assertion of the difficulty of prosecuting a cop.  We are at that point with these rogue cops who falsified a FISA app to spy on Trump.  What can be done about it?

Maybe nothing, except shooting them.  Just like the movie.

Sharyl Attkisson: The Six Red Flags We Missed Regarding the FBI’s Abusive FISA Witch Hunt Against the Trump Campaign

The six red flags

This stuff is so insidious.  Horowitz says "no bias", but then he says yes there was.  But he said both.  The "no bias" was in the executive summary.  The actual bias was everywhere else, where nobody looks.

Try to simplify it.  Carter Page was falsely accused of being a spy for Russia.  In so doing, the bad cops got a warrant to electronically spy on Trump's communications through the two-hop rule.  That is it in a nutshell.

So what is "two-hops"?  The first hop is who Page talks to, and who that person talks to is the second hop. That could be Trump himself.

Election odds

There are some who say this is better than polls.  That isn't saying much.

The trouble with polls is with who you ask.  Consequently, a poll can tell you anything you want it to say.

Bettors have to put their money where their mouth is.  That's something, I suppose.

I'm going to start following the odds a bit.  Maybe it might tell me something that the polls don't.

Rasmussen has Trump at about 50 percent.  The odds are about that too, so what does that tell you?

Incidentally, odds are expressed in percent.  You can calculate the odds from percentages with the following formula.

Let's say the odds are 50%.  Odds = 100 / (Percent Chance x 1.1066)

                                                        = 100/ ( 50 x 1.1066)

                                                        = 100/ 55.3

                                                       = 1.8

A ninety percentage odds will get you to 1, approximately.  Ninety percent odds is just about as close to certainty that you can get.

Comey or Corney? Stalking a Half-Popped Kernel of a Deep-State Kerning Conspiracy

Comey or Corney? Stalking a Half-Popped Kernel of a Deep-State Kerning Conspiracy

The article notes that the pdf document doesn't seem to recognize Comey's name, oddly enough.  I noticed that as well, as the read-out-loud version of the text kept pronouncing Comey's name as "Corney".

The Mueller Report also has an issue with text searches.  You cannot do one on it.

A "conspiracy" indeed.  "Impeach the mofo."  That's the ticket.

More about conservapedia

There's a pretty good written source of info there.  It will tell you all about Spygate and so forth.

Let's see:  with what I saw about Spygate, the Steele Dossier is completely discredited.  As for Crowdstrike?  They are discredited as well.  Crowdstrike were the only ones who saw the DNC servers, and it may be the case that they didn't even examine them either.  But I can't back that up.  It is well-known that the FBI didn't, and the FBI completely relied 100% upon Crowdstrike.  Just like they did with the Steele Dossier to get the FISA warrant on Carter Page.  This is where the electronic SPYING took place- hence Spygate.  It had two hops, anybody who talked to Page was the first hop, and the next one down the line.  That could have included Trump himself.

At any rate, the "Russian hack" wasn't a hack.  It was a leak.  Conservapedia has all the details on why nobody should believe Crowdstrike, and by extension, the FBI/ Mueller crowd.

Since there was no hack, the only thing left is PappaD and Downer.  That too looks questionable.

Oh, dear.  It looks like the Democrats just made it all up.  Why?  In order to get out in front of Wikileaks' release of the emails back in 2016.  It was a preemptive attack on the Trump campaign by blaming it on the Russians and on Trump.  They haven't given up on it either.

The fact of the matter is that Hillary's lack of care for her email servers, and the DNC's for their own security, are the reasons for their own downfall.  They are compounding the error by impeaching the President.

Ukraine is just more of the same, so that is why it is lumped in.  They don't want Trump to look into it.  They have plenty to hide.  The Donald is getting too close.  He and Barr have got to go before they find the truth.

Winter Solstice

Update:

12.23.19:

I got a brainstorm to try my desktop keyboard which uses a usb connector.  It plugged in okay, and it works.  How 'bout dat?

12.21.19:

This computer keyboard is now fouled up.  If I wanted to do a post, it will have to be short.

Today is the winter solstice.  Can you tell I've waited all year to announce that?  But that is not why I am posting.  Today, I saw something on Conservapedia that I haven't seen anywhere else.  John Brennan is nuts.

Well, it was more than that.  It looks as if Brennan's role in Spygate needs to be exposed a bit more than what it has been.

Why didn't I know more?  Probably because the places that I go for information haven't made that case forcefully enough.

It is odd how many have been roped into this Spygate.  It is a closely-knit small group.  They might take down the whole ship.  What ship?   The Democrat ship, or the ship of state.

Something is going down.