More about conservapedia

There's a pretty good written source of info there.  It will tell you all about Spygate and so forth.

Let's see:  with what I saw about Spygate, the Steele Dossier is completely discredited.  As for Crowdstrike?  They are discredited as well.  Crowdstrike were the only ones who saw the DNC servers, and it may be the case that they didn't even examine them either.  But I can't back that up.  It is well-known that the FBI didn't, and the FBI completely relied 100% upon Crowdstrike.  Just like they did with the Steele Dossier to get the FISA warrant on Carter Page.  This is where the electronic SPYING took place- hence Spygate.  It had two hops, anybody who talked to Page was the first hop, and the next one down the line.  That could have included Trump himself.

At any rate, the "Russian hack" wasn't a hack.  It was a leak.  Conservapedia has all the details on why nobody should believe Crowdstrike, and by extension, the FBI/ Mueller crowd.

Since there was no hack, the only thing left is PappaD and Downer.  That too looks questionable.

Oh, dear.  It looks like the Democrats just made it all up.  Why?  In order to get out in front of Wikileaks' release of the emails back in 2016.  It was a preemptive attack on the Trump campaign by blaming it on the Russians and on Trump.  They haven't given up on it either.

The fact of the matter is that Hillary's lack of care for her email servers, and the DNC's for their own security, are the reasons for their own downfall.  They are compounding the error by impeaching the President.

Ukraine is just more of the same, so that is why it is lumped in.  They don't want Trump to look into it.  They have plenty to hide.  The Donald is getting too close.  He and Barr have got to go before they find the truth.