Updated,
3:00 pm:
There is more on this video, as the earlier portion is only about half of the video.
There are at least two other references besides the Mueller case that he covers. One involved a beating of an old guy who wore a MAGA cap. These stories are a recurrent theme out there. The left appears to be resorting to violence if they cannot have their way.
Lest you think this is only on the fringe, he mentions the Manafort treatment. He doesn't defend Manafort's behavior. He was convicted. No, not that. It does seem clear that the left wants to punish Manafort all out of proportion to what he was actually convicted of doing. My take on that is that they want to intimidate those who would support Trump in any way.
Keep in mind that the DOJ passed on the prosecution of Manafort long before Trump ran for POTUS. Therefore, he is being treated this way because of his association with Trump. It is plain and simple intimidation. It is coming under the color of authority. This isn't fringe, then.
If elements of the GOP want to join with that, then whatever is said against them is justified as far as I am concerned. Actually, anybody who joins something like this ought to be removed from any organization with any sense of decency.
11:32 am:
The stuff that Bongino covers is also in his show notes, or so he says. The thing that grabbed my attention appears to not be in the show notes. Or if it is, it isn't properly labelled.
This isn't to knock Bongino's work. I think he is doing a great job, but there is so much stuff in there that you can get lost in the details. That is especially true when you are watching a
video. A lot of info goes flying by, and you think .... wait! Back up the truck, and let's look at that again.
With that in mind, I dive a bit deeper into that video. There's some interesting tidbits here that should be looked at a bit closer. Only insiders may be fully familiar with it. Somebody like me is NOT an insider, so this stuff may seem a bit esoteric at times. The following may seem like insider baseball, but it actually made it into the
Washington Post, of all places.
Let's look once again at this Ruemmler character. Did you know that she was on the short list as replacement AG in the Obama Administration? There was a 2014 scandal in the "scandal-free" administration involving the Secret Service and prostitutes. It seems that Ruemmler was in the thick of that, and that is why she didn't make AG, you see. This wasn't the only time Ruemmler was involved in something questionable.
As we reported previously, not only was Ms. Ruemmler in the middle of the IRS email scandal, the Benghazi cover-up, and the most vigorous “protector” of a president while increasing government secrecy and violating the rights of others, the Post places her squarely in the middle of the cover-up of the Cartagena sex scandal for which the Secret Service and the military took the sole blame for having several prostitutes spend the night before the President arrived.[ Sidney Powell, Observer dot com op-ed ]
Reference to this tidbit was here:
 |
| Ruemmler is a "fixer". |
It so happens that Ruemmler is Nader's attorney, and was Obama's White House legal counsel as well. Talking about a John Dean type character. Except that she hasn't been caught yet involved in something, or has she? Well, if she has, nobody seems to be looking. Why not? Maybe this is a clue.
 |
| Nader has been around. This guy is a guy that Trump INHERITS from previous administration, including Obama's. But you'd never know that from the way it is being reported. |
So, from here, Bongino swerves into mentioning his "fixer show". Whoa! Back up the truck again. You gottta lay out these details a bit more. Well from that, I got the connections of all these people to each other. I posted that yesterday. Here it is again in a chart.
 |
| They all know each other. |
This screen shot came from the fixer show mentioned here:
 |
| You have to watch this show too, which I did. |
So, why was Mueller so interested in Nader as the source? Remember, Nader has just gotten busted for child porn. He is a REPEAT offender. NOBODY seemed interested in that. Why? Just asking, WHY?
Well, here's a link to a possible motivation:
Read the caption, there. Why is Mueller talking to a guy who might know something that could incriminate Hillary? What does this have to do with Trump? Salon says that there is nothing to see with regard to Hillary. But is that really true? Anyway, the term
Panama Papers came up. One more thing to research there. What this all about? Click on the link above for more info ( from Wikipedia) Bongino comments that the salon dot com piece was written on the basis of left-wing angle ---"nail the rich" --- not the Mueller Russian investigation angle. But did they miss something? Bongino thinks so.
This relates to Nader and his information regarding a certain meeting. Nader was involved in setting up the meeting. Evidently, this meeting was supposed to have information useful to Mueller, but as we've seen, there was no there "there". It could have been meant as a "set up" in order to smear Trump with a fake suspicious meeting, which was actually a nothingburger. The real significance is how Clinton gets involved in something nefarious, it is a nothing, but when Trump has an insignificant brush with it, well there a scandal there. That old double standard rears its head. Nader's motivation is to get help with his own troubles. Hence, his need for a fixer.
Note that the "Republican" named Mueller, the guy running the investigation, isn't the least bit interested in any possible collusion of Hillary with this Russian intereference in the US election. No sir, he is only interested in Trump. For this, we are to believe that it is non-partisan. Hah.
It is well-known that Republicans didn't want Trump as the nominee in 2016. Yet, after two years of this, and a great deal of spying, they cannot pin anything on the guy. Could the Clintons survive that kind of scrutiny? No way.
Because of all that bias against Trump, the real scandals are not investigated. The GOP would rather stop Trump than investigate real corruption in the DOJ and in the previous administration. Is there any wonder then that they are so ineffective as an opposition party?
Guess who was brought into the Mueller team?
Kathy Reummler. Bias? What bias. /sarc Conflict of interest? What conflict of interest? ( remember that Reummler represents one of Mueller's informants, who happens to be a child porn offender who needs a "fixer") /sarc
Okay, I think this is about all that I want to cover. It is taking all morning to do this much, but this is only about half the show.
What did I get out of it? That the Mueller Investigation is running cover for the Obamas and Clintons. He's part of their Praetorian Guard. As long as Trump has to play defense, he cannot turn his attention to cleaning up DC. Trump cannot "drain the swamp" while they are trying to drown him in it. The Democrats have GOP help, but Trump needs their support in order to survive. Meanwhile, they
both work overtime to stop his agenda, and keep a cloud over him so that they can get him out by election if not by coup.
