Why so quick to throw the cops under the bus?

When I first heard about the George Floyd killing, I just assumed that it was the cop's fault. As soon as it became political though, I began to be suspicious. A bit more thought on the situation leads me to believe that we are all so beaten down by the left that we are just falling all over ourselves to submit to them. My first reaction, as mentioned above, is a prime example of that phenomenon. I ASSUMED THE COPS WERE GUILTY. What is the basis for such a belief?

Maybe there isn't one except a type of Stockholm's Syndrome. It is a type of abuse that is described when it is said that the beatings will continue until morale improves.

Seems that Limbaugh sided against the cops. Why so quick to throw the cops under the bus? What is their side of the story?

These cops are already declared guilty before they are put on trial. We have no evidence of anything as of yet, except for the video. The video may look superficially bad, but it is a one-sided affair which just shows the cops. It shows no other information that may help to explain why it happened the way it did.

It reminds me of how many so-called conservatives were not helping Trump out during the election nor afterwards. It appears that everybody has been beaten down, but from the way you hear the Democrats say it, it is the left who had been beaten down. If that is true, then why are these cops being thrown under the bus so fast?

The latest Democratic instigated flare-up

When it comes to anything Trump, you can be assured that Democrats are going to be all over it. Hence we have the latest riots ( called "protests" by the media ) with regards to the George Floyd killing.

This sparked my curiosity a bit, so I started checking it out for details. There is precious little info about George Floyd. It is now about the cops. I checked out the video. There are bystanders who filmed the incident, and who are yelling at the cops to let the guy up.

One comment about THAT. For one thing, you are not supposed to interfere with police officers in the performance of their duties. There were two cops shown in the video. One has Floyd pinned down, and the other is facing the group of people taking part in the video. We don't see how many of those people were present.

My impression is that the second cop was controlling the people who were heckling the cops. If there were only two cops present, then the problem is that there weren't enough cops on the scene in order to get the guy under control. There was something said about putting the guy in the car, but the cop or cops said that they tried this for several minutes. Evidently, there was a furious struggle.

Very little information other than that with regard to Floyd is available at this time. Instead of that, there is plenty about the reaction to it.

It seems that it has gone political with Obama and Biden weighing in on the matter. Trump is said to have posted a tweet about the RIOTS, which these guys are attempting to make an issue out of it.

Trump seems to have tweeted that the shooting starts when the riots start, or something to that effect. There are media stories about how bad of a thing that was to say. It should be mentioned that Trump was referring to RIOTS, not protests. The media wants this to be about PROTESTS. Protests do not include destruction of businesses and being disruptive.

I suspect the "protests" are meant to create further mayhem that has already been visited upon the country from the SCAMDEMIC, which is being mislabelled as a pandemic. The "pandemic" is fostered by the same motive, which has been in evidence all along. That motive is to sabotage the Presidency of Donald Trump and punish America for putting him in the White House.

The President wanted the RIOTS to stop. Everyone has the right to peaceable assemble and redress their grievances, but this does not include violence and rioting. But the Democrats are pouring the gasoline on the fire so to speak by taking it national and escalating the situation.

All to be expected. We can expect this until it is resolved one way or the other. It is a political situation. It isn't a matter of justice. That is probably why there almost no information about George Floyd and why you cannot see who put this video together and what motivated them to interfere. The pertinent facts are being hidden. 

We don't get to see what happened that caused the incident in the first place. Nor anything about George Floyd. It is all about the cops now and Trump. Of course "whitey" is to blame too. Trouble is, this was a Democrat-run police department and the Democrats are now making political hay out of it. I smell a rat.

Japan had no lockdown

They have the following stats:

source: wordofmeters

The lockdowns were useless and ineffective and unnecessary.

They KNEW he was innocent!

John Huber’s thread on what the Deep State tried to do to George Papadopoulos is a DOOZY

Two things

1. They didn't "try".  The actually DID do these things.
2. This is evil as hell.

Seriously about the second point.  This stuff might as well have come out of Nazi Germany.  Hell, even the Nazis weren't this bad.  ( That is not excusing the Nazis.  This is really, really bad.)

Once again.  If they can do this, then what else are they capable of?  Why would you people even begin to listen to these maniacs?

Joseph Campbell and the Power of Myth 01 The Hero's Adventure

Update:

There are two definitions for the word. One is somewhat innocuous, but the other definition says it amounts to a lie.

If you were to change the title to "Power of Lies", then you get the idea. Even in this day and age, where lying is excused or even defended, such a statement might seem a bit too much.

A deeper dive into that thought may reveal that lying is a way to power. Therefore, the Power of Lies could well be a proper title, but not well-received. Too close to the truth.

"Getting to the bottom" of what-have-you is never reached, nor intended to be reached.

Oct 12, 2013...

I watch the movie Logan's Run today.  That story had a hero's adventure in it.  Logan was sent on a mission "outside" in order to destroy a threat to a civilization.  Instead of completing his mission, and destroying that threat as was intended, he brought back something unexpected, which destroyed that civilization.

Logan ended a dystopic view of a future civilization, and put it back on a better path.  The movie won some awards, but is not well received by everybody.  One can see why.  There are those who want things to change, and there are those who want things to remain as they are.  I would suspect those who don't like this movie are experiencing it as something of a threat.

[video deleted]

King Solomon's Scenario

Back in the days when Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn was still being taught in schools, there was something about that book that I recall, and that I want to share that may be relevant to what is happening today.

It is the Biblical story of King Solomon and the dispute over a child. Twain's book has Huck and Jim arguing about it. It seems that Jim didn't understand why King Solomon would want to chop the child in half in order to find out who the child really belonged to.

Huck's point was that the real mom didn't want her child to be killed so she gave up her child. Jim disagreed. He took King Solomon literally. With respect to our current situation, could we be taking the fearmongers too literally about this virus "pandemic" as Jim did in the book?

Does our situation really require a national lockdown? It seems that the Democrats would rather split the baby than to allow the other mother ( meaning the GOP ) to have it. The "baby" is power. It rule-or-ruin time for them. Splitting the baby means dividing the country into two over how to handle this situation. We should all agree upon basic principles. One of those is that the Constitution still applies. Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant anything like this kind of power unless you refer to the suspension of Habeus Corpus. This happened during the Civil War. Surely this situation isn't as dire as that.

Quite the charge now isn't it? But it makes sense given all the other things they have been doing. These jokers are considering another impeachment of the President. The little fecal show is supposed to impress all the folks back home. Why wouldn't they stir up a national panic in order to pave the way to a questionable victory? Why wouldn't they assume powers not intended and then try to take political advantage of that? Why not blame Trump for the loss of life and the destruction of the economy? If they can pull it off, why wouldn't they? They certainly have gotten away with a lot so far.

The thing that should impress people is that these people really don't have the welfare of the nation in mind. It is like the woman in the Biblical story mentioned in the novel. The woman would let the child die before she would allow the other woman to have the child. She cared nothing for the child. NY Gov. Cuomo forces infected patients upon nursing homes when he should have known that it was practically a death sentence for everybody in that situation. Why would he do such a thing, and why would the media make him out to be a hero?

If this theory is correct, then we've got a lot of bigger problems than what the virus appears to be. There's something a lot deeper going on. I do not take them literally when they say they care about people's lives. Not with what Cuomo did. I do not take them literally when they say there is a crisis that requires a national lockdown and a suspension of civil liberties. Not when so many people are likely not at risk of death from this virus. It kills mostly sick and ill people. Young and healthy people will be okay. That's not worthy of a national lockdown.