Denier? Nope.

In an adversarial system Trump would be a vociferous COVID-19 denier.

The Democrats like to throw odium upon anybody who denies their pet theories, like Glowbull Warming. It's part of the politics of "shut up". Nobody can criticize their perfect and lofty concern for the welfare of others. /sarc

So those like Trump are called Covid "deniers". But Trump has not been on an adversarial tear against this so-called "pandemic". He has competed with the Dems for who's best at attacking it. It isn't really an adversarial process, it is a competition for who can bullshit the subject the best.

The truth isn't best served by such a process. The court system uses an adversarial process in order to arrive at a verdict. So when the Democrats call Trump a COVID "denier", as usual they are full of it. It would be more like Perry Mason stuff if he was a "denier".

There is a great political risk though in being adversarial. It is putting all your eggs in one basket, so to speak. If Trump were to go after COVID-19 with hammer and tongs, he might lose that fight. If he lost that fight, he could lose the election. It could be disastrous.

People might blame Trump for not being more adversarial, but this isn't likely to be the best political strategy. Too risky politically. Unfortunately for us, we have to have someone supply us with an opposition line. This has to go against the Democrats demogogueing the phony issue. They have the money and the bullhorns to go with their bullshit. Those of us who want to question it only have the truth. May not be a fair fight.

But if the Democrats were really interested in the public good, they would stop politiczing COVID-19. This is what made me suspicious of the whole phenomenon back during the early days of this.

We have to get through the politics of COVID-19. Whatever COVID-19 is, it isn't going to be found in the political process. Quite the contrary. The politics may be worse than the so called "pandemic".

No more fake news

 

No more fake news

So I am reading this blog I wrote about earlier today. One thing he says is that they are telling "stories". Yep, in my opinion, we are being regaled with endless fairy tales. Yep, and the saddest story of them all is that grown people believe in them.

-You have an fascist organization supporting a group that is supposedly antifascist. Riiiight. -You have a political party for the little man that screws over the little man incessantly. -You have a political party for the black man that screws over the black man incessantly. -You have an online newspaper that says "Democracy Dies in Darkness" that joins forces with those who would steal your votes and impose the darkest regime possible that would rule over us with an iron fist. -You have them "supporting" human rights while they knock your teeth out when you assert those rights.

And if you question them at all, you are the meanest person alive. Really?

The left hides behind others in order to peddle their own lies. The sad thing is that people fall for it.

Why not ask some questions when you still have that right? But the left will try to say that you cannot ask any questions at all. It is the politics of "shut up".

Shut up and keep wearing those masks, ya'll.

Talking about red pill

If the lie wins we all lose--- Big Time

Long timers here may remember my posts about The Matrix. Yeah, it was about the movie and how it maps upon our own society. Funny thing is that other people are thinking the same thing. I thought it was an original thought, but it looks like it wasn't.

On the other hand, it has been said that "great minds" think alike. I like the idea of having a "great mind". ☺

Anyway, the research into the possiblity that this COVID-19 "pandemic" was a hoax in nearly ALL RESPECTS, has brought me to the guy who said something similar to what I said. He even wrote books about it. Evidently, he has a greater mind than mine, but if he thought of it, he must be a smart guy. That's cuz I don't think I am so dumb myself. I'd like to think so.

If you follow the chain of links that can be obtained here you'll find this guy---Jon Rappoport, who has a blog called by his own name. Underneath is "NoMoreFakeNews.com".[https://nomorefakenews.com]

I've read a little of the blog. He's got a following. So, I'll check it out. We all need as much help as we can get to escape The Matrix. Unfortunately for us, this ain't no movie.

Trust

More on COVID-19

Just asking questions here. I realize that there are many folks out there that really believe in this thing. Please don't attribute some questions here as meaning I'm claiming that this is a hoax. Not saying that it is a hoax, but now I am suspicious that it COULD be. People sometimes don't hear you the way you intend, or read into something you said that is not what you intended. I am not claiming hoax, but AM claiming IT COULD BE.

Unfortunately, I am hobbled by a computer problem. I can only connect with the internet indirectly, so it is hard to research this thing. I am looking up a few things.

First and foremost, what should you believe? I just read a UPI poll that claims that such and such number of people know somebody who had it. A bit of digging into the poll revealed something that made me suspicious. I know. I know. That word "suspicious" might cause a few antenna to go up. But MINE is up BIG TIME. No apologies will be made for that.

There are just too many lies out that I have to start questioning things that I wouldn't have done in the past. Just too much misinformation. Who do you trust? That is not such an easy question to answer.

I didn't know too much about the CDC, so I looked up a few things about that. The CDC is a bit too opaque in my opinion. Anyway, it is a sub-agency of Health and Human Services, which is a Federal agency. So, it is government, which means it is probably going to favor Democrats.

That might get some people's dander up, but it is the way it is. Government agencies are dominated by Democrats. That's a fact of life.

People trust the CDC, or so it seems. Being that it is likely in control of the Big Government types, I am going to have to be suspicious of it. The CDC is organized into several pieces, each with its own responsibility. The one that is in charge of COVID-19 is run by an Obama appointee who happens to be Rod Rosenstein's sister.

Yeah, that Rod Rosenstein. Before I wrote that, I checked it. They are related.

What about this Dr. Fauci? Frankly, I never heard of him at all before all of this COVID-19 stuff happened.

The Fauci guy has been around for a long time, and he is in charge of something, which I didn't take note of and have forgotten already. That's not too important to this discussion. The thing that is important is that people trust him. But WHY?

Why trust somebody you don't know? What does anybody really know about this guy? We have a Presidential Election going on, but these guys can keep secrets under the glaring lights. Here's a guy who isn't running and people trust him. What do we really know about him? Huh? Why trust him with so much influence when we don't really know him?

Another item of news here: the media is starting to hype the COVID-19 thing again. More cases than ever, they say. People are dying, they say. They say a lot of things. A lot of things that aren't so when you look closer. The media and the Democrats are just about the same thing.

So the thing to remember is that this article I saw this morning says that the virus has not been purified. In the old days, that is how you did it. Nowadays, they depend upon computers. If nobody has isolated and purified a sample of it, how the hell do you know what you have? There is room for some fraud here is all I am saying. Questions should be asked, but people are too trusting.

People are dying, you may say. Sure. But of WHAT exactly? We don't know if we don't have a purfied sample of it. People could keep on dying until we know EXACTLY what we are dealing with. If this article was correct, then we DON'T. A vaccine could be meaningless and useless if it is obtained in this fashion.

Keep in mind that all of this could be deliberate in order to draw this out as long as possible. We DO have an election going on.

Presidential election truth table--- Part Two

It just occurred to me that the truth table could be distilled down to ONE question with regards to BOTH candidates.

Drum roll please...

And the question is: With respect to the two candidates, is he corrupt, or not?

You'd still get the same four possibilities. To wit, neither, one of them, or both.

Based upon what is known at this point, which one is corrupt?

I'd say Biden is. Critics of Trump will say he is. But what say you, if you are trying to be as objective as possible, based upon all available information?

This all assumes that you give a hoop about corruption in the first place. That may sound harsh, but I think it is fair and accurate that there are way, way too many people who just don't care. But they'll start caring if they have to eat out of dumpsters, like in Venezuela.

Trump interview with Leslie Stahl

 There's a lot being said about it on the web, so it is worth making a post about it.

It is interesting to note how Trump responds to Stahl as a technique.  She is trying to make him look bad, and the fact is that the media LOVES to do this to GOP presidential candidates.

I watched about 2/3rds of it.  There are claims out there that Trump "stormed" out of the interview.  Trump posted it on Facebook, and you can watch it there and see for yourself.  I watched excerpts of that part, plus the first 2/3rds of it, but not all.

Stahl comes off as "whiny", yet you hear quite the opposite from Trump's critics.  All I can say is watch it for yourself.  Decide for yourself.

The left and their henchmen in the media have hyped the Covid-19 beyond all reason.  In that interview, Stahl wants to focus in on that as if it was the biggest problem right now.  It may well be perceived as the biggest issue out there, but it isn't really.  It has been hyped into the biggest issue out there.

The left-wing governors are treating with draconian measures that are stifling the economies of their states and that is what is causing a bit of a lag in the recovery.  Blue state unemployment is much higher than red states.

Trump didn't say that from what parts I heard.  Not making that point strongly may come back to bite Trump.  On the other hand, it is hard to argue with success.  It all depends on whether the strategy works well enough for him to win.  On the other hand, the part that I didn't watch may have had him making that point.  Just goes to show you something.  Maybe people have already made up their minds.  I made up mine a long time ago.

Losers gotta lose

 Unlike Democrats, who cannot find the right bathroom, I can prove that I didn't like Romney a long time ago.

Romney said he didn't vote for Trump.  He's a constant reminder of why he couldn't beat Obama when he was given a golden opportunity to do so when a certain event happened in Libya on September 11, 2012.

Only a loser like Romney could believe what he thinks is going to be important to anybody but himself.

Presidential Election Truth Table

 

For those of you who may find things like this interesting, I offer a little "computer-ese" to the discussion. Computers may not be taught this way anymore, but in the old days, you spent a lot of time in computer science classes learning about truth tables. After all, that is how a computer works.

Everything inside that black box is about zeroes and ones. The computer is like a gigantic maze of on-off switches. That state of each bit is either one ( for on ) and zero ( for off). The on and off states can easily be mapped on true or false tests.

It is a type of algebra with its own mathematical rules. But it isn't necessary to get into all that here. Your most simple diagram is a two-bit state with four possibilities. Let's map it on to the Presidential Race, shall we? Each candidate is a "bit". It's state is whether or not he is guilty or innocent of the charges.

There are four possibilities for the following two questions: one for each candidate. For Biden, is he a crook? True or False? For Trump, is he a racist? True or false? I chose these questions based upon what the critics of each seem to think is most important question at this juncture.

So there's four possibilities for the two questions.

Regarding accusations in terms of guilt as follows:

                          Biden Trump

......................       F           F        both are innocent

............................ F           T        only Trump is guilty

...........................  T            F       only Biden is guilty

..................           T            T       both are guilty



What if neither question determines the outcome?

That may mean that the "debate" is usually meaningless, as the people's questions aren't being addressed.

Let's assume that the questions indicated above ARE the ones people care about the most. Then the questions should be about nothing else but these two. In order to answer the questions fully, there should be something like a courtroom with witnesses and cross-examinations.

Of course none of this is about the truth anyway. The debate isn't going to do anything but confirm what you already believe. It is designed that way, and executed that way.

If it really was about the truth, I think Trump would win in a cakewalk.

Modern science: Celebrating a “high priestess” instead of data

Behind the Black  blog




He makes a case that I agree with.  The case is that our society is in danger of abandoning the one thing that has contributed to its greatness the most ( in my opinion and it looks like his too). 

He says it a bit differently than I would, but it comes down to the same thing.  I'd call it a "passion for truth".  Truth just is what it is, not what you want it to be.  Truth exists apart from human will or desires.  It is what it is whether you want it to be or not.