If you can't take a joke

And now, these very important messages

and this

If you don't click, you're missing out.

Brandon's speech continued

There's not a whole lot to say here, but just one more thing. Brandon said ( based upon an excerpt of his speech) that the MAGA faction of the GOP is the minority. How can this be true, then? If the MAGA faction isn't a majority, then how is it a threat? It doesn't add up.

Sometimes the bullsheets gets so thick that even Brandon doesn't believe it himself. He contradicted himself the very next day.

Maybe nobody believes Brandon, but it looks like a lot noticed how creepy that address was.

Biden's speech

No comment since it wasn't really worth watching anyway. The reviews of it are pretty negative. It is pretty much the same junk he's been saying. Nothing new from these people, just the same old lies.

It appears that there may be an attempt to intimidate. Here's the POTUS calling a substantial portion of the country as unacceptable and untrustworthy types. You can resent this, but it isn't worth giving the time of day to.

The Establishment type GOP was the intended target according to some. It would appear so. If the two factions can be split apart, then that makes the job of the Democrats much easier.

But the Establishment GOP needs to understand that the MAGA base is on to their baloney. It isn't going to work this time, if the usual indicators stay the same. The J6 committee didn't change anything. If anything, it has stiffen the spine of at least a few of the wobbly ones.

It may take a pretty stiff spine to withstand what these people will dish out.

Crypto is no solution

 

1971 the year we became enslaved

Everything about this video makes sense except for the solution. The solution offered to the economic stagnation of the last 50 years isn't crypto, it is real estate. More to the point, it is land.

Only land can offer you control over your personal security and wellbeing. Without it, you are at the mercy of slavers.

For all intents and purposes, a job is wage slavery. The slavery exists in money exchange, in which requires you to earn what you need to obtain your goods and services. This is true in any case, because nobody is fully self-sufficient, but even more so when you are a wage slave. The solution is to be able to produce your own food and shelter, and provide for your own security with whatever firepower that you can muster.

It should be noted that when they take your guns, they make the slavery complete and final. Once they have your guns, and keep you segregated in large cities, they friggin' OWN you-- "lock, stock, and barrel". They people most insecure are the ones that beg for this the hardest. These are the ones that have to be educated away from the system that most cruelly enslaves them. These are the ones the slavers are indoctrinating with deceit- a false promise of an easy life.

They come not to free you, but to enslave you with free stuff. The only way to stay free is by blood and sweat from you own selves. The seductive way of an easy life is how they ensnare you.

Crypto solves none of these problems. It is an easy way out, which is no way at all. The only way is to own and work your own land. Only land can keep you alive and can shelter and sustain you. Crypto is just the latest hoax. A fake solution in an ever increasing fake world.

Gab social site and Doug Mastriano

Hit piece on Doug Mastriano

Gab probably isn't a household word, so if anybody hears anything about it, they may not have any first hand experience with it. As for Doug Mastriano, he is running for office in Pennsylvania. (probably governor) The link is described as a hit piece by a website that I visit regularly. It might be called "right-wing". The piece describes Gab as "right-wing". This is the very thing that I've been hammering on forever, it seems.

It has gotten to the point that whenever some website calls anybody "right-wing", they jump the shark with me. Any use of that Marxist terminology should be verboten for anybody who claims to be objective and honest.

I did sign up for Gab once upon a time, but I've never used it. What I've heard about them is that they don't block anybody. The trouble with blocking somebody for something is that it can lead to wholesale political censorship. This is currently being done with Big Tech, and Gab is the alternative to Big Tech. Does merely doing this kind of thing make them "right-wing"? Actually, according to law, ALL social media platforms should be like Gab. The fact that they are not, and they block people should raise more than a few antenna out there.

I'd like to think that people are astute enough not to fall so easily for this kind of political bias, but I am quite sure that more than a few actually do fall for it.

Is Gab really "anti-Semitic"? That's what the linked article above is trying to accuse Gab of. They are also trying to link Mastriano to anti-Semitic violence. That is the kind of thing that raises my antenna more than a bit. The media is not going to be in any way fair and balanced on these subjects.

But, I suppose I could look into it. I already have. The Gab founder is a strongly pro-Christian "nationalist". Er, whenever someone uses a charged word like "nationalist", my antenna goes up again. If he refers to himself as "nationalist", then that's fair game. The same thing as calling yourself as being "on the right". It is short step to being called a fascist, and you can see what they're doing right now. Why would you give them the ammo in which they can attack you?

Experimental post (continued)

More about that post yesterday. It was a reaction to lower than usual pageviews. In that post, there was a mention of "Tsar Bomba". There wasn't a Tsar Bomba post, per se, but a Tsar Bomba UPDATE to an existing post. That's what gave me the notion of an alternative explanation. Maybe the Tsar Bomba UPDATE wasn't even seen or noticed. That may be why there was no reaction, thus fewer pageviews.

So much for that. Learn and move on. Updates don't generate pageviews. I'll move on. Don't know if I'll eliminate Updates, though. This post could have been an update, but this one WAS eliminated as an update. It will be a separate post.

Maybe because it really isn't an update. It will have a new idea beginning now. The new idea is this: what happened to the citizen's journalist concept that was originated in the concept of blogging? The old blogs were like that, but the one's now have all but abandoned the idea.

The old way was to support other bloggers. You'd do that by having their names on your sidebar. Each blogger supported other bloggers. That's not done now. It has become commercialized. Commercialization will lead to the same problems that blogs were supposed to address. Those were to have alternative viewpoints. Now the government is into censorship. If you say anything that contradicts the party line, you will be cancelled. You will be labelled a source of "misinformation". Before long, you will be branded as an enemy of the people. It is just like the old Soviet Union. By the way, the government is doing illegal censorship. The government cannot legally deputize media to censor the news, but they are doing it anyway.

Once upon a time, we did have a fake free press. It was a fake free press as opposed to a real free press. People like the fakery. Fake seems to work better than being real. People are more inclined to believe the fakery. Real things are just so yesterday. But yesterday was also fake. The "free press" wasn't free. There was bias in the media. They pretended to be objective, but they weren't. Now they don't even pretend. They are recognized as being partisan, but people don't care. They like fakery. As long as the media puts out the propaganda they agree with, they lap it all up. Might as well be TASS or Izvestia of the old Soviet Union. But this is supposed to the good 'ol USA. Sorry, pal. The "free press" is fake. We got freedom, baby! The fake freedom of a fake free press.

But now, all too often, the blogs are fake too. Do you remember the "Rather-gate" scandal? Dan Rather got caught red handed making stuff up. The blogger "Little Green Footballs" was in the lead in uncovering that scandal. Dan Rather got canned. What happened to Little Green Footballs? I checked, and it's out there. He might as well be as fake as Dan Rather these days. Somebody must be sponsoring his ass. No more independent citizen journalism for that guy. No more honesty either. Selling out to the almight dollar.

I've tried to run an honest blog. Not that I will ever turn dishonest to try to make a buck. If I can't make it honestly, I won't make it. That's why there will be NO exceptions! A blog ( and a blogger) isn't worth a damn if he's dishonest. His words are worth the paper they're printed on. ( Or more accurately, his words aren't worth the electrons that go up on his and your screen.)

Experimental post

Here's an experimental post for ya.

The experiment is simply this: I haven't read the news today. Why not do something different every once in awhile?

So this post is just about anything and everything that isn't related to the news. It could be about my reactions to the news. It isn't news, it is just the blog itself.

The last post was a little like that. I thought it over a bit. Is there an alternative explanation for what I discussed? Perhaps. But nothing in that post was false. I didn't make up anything. I won't do that. However, if there's an opinion, it is just opinion. Facts are facts, opinions are opinions. Opinions can be changed, but facts don't change. Now, what you think may be a fact, but not be a fact. If more information is found that may throw a different light on what appears to be a fact, then yes, the understanding of what is fact can also change.

There may be alternative point of view is all I'm saying.

There is one policy here worth discussing just a bit. That policy is about comments. There won't be any anonymous comments on this blog. Period. I think that is one thing that is really, really wrong about the public square these days. If a person won't put his or her name on his or her comments, then it isn't worth a bucket of warm spit. Actually, it is worse. It has been shown that people act differently once they are behind a cloak of anonymity. Why do you think the KKK wears hoods? Why do you think crime is more often committed in the dark? People can do things in the dark, or under the cloak of anonymity; that they'd never do out in the open. This is evil. I won't have it.

There won't be anonymous comments here. EVER. I put my name out there, everybody who wishes to comment will have to do the same. NO CHANGES WILL BE MADE. EVER. The issue is closed.

Something's funny going on

There was something on Bongino's show recently. He may have mentioned it again today. Remember the Orwellian Truth Ministry proposition? Supposedly, it got canned. But Bongino is saying "wait a minute". He says that they are still doing the same things, but under DHS. Keep this in mind for anybody reading this.

You see, that's the thing. I'm wondering if this blog is really being read. Then something happens that makes me think it IS, then something else happens that makes me think it ISN'T. The thing that makes me think that it is being read is counter-intuitive. If I were to write something that might be considered hard-hitting, the pageviews go down. Then sometimes the pageviews go way the hell up when I don't do anything at all. This doesn't make sense to me. What I am getting at is that there may be some bot activity. Maybe it is ALL bot activity. I don't want to write for bots. I don't want to kid myself about my "readership". If there aren't any, then what's the point?

The post about the "Tsar Bomba" is such an example. I write that post, and the numbers go way, way down. That would indicate that SOMEBODY doesn't like what I wrote. Or is it SOMETHING doesn't like my post? If I didn't post for a few days, then the numbers might go up. Why? To encourage me to post something? It's weird.

What I'm getting at is really going to sound paranoid. But if the Orwellians in Big Tech wanted to squash a blog without it appearing that they were squashing a blog, couldn't they do it? Is my blog being squashed, I guess is the question. And why would they care about such a small-time blog?

One thing is that it would take only ONE spark to ignite an inferno. Don't you see? NOTHING can be allowed to contradict the mind-controllers. This is what you get in totalitarian states. Everybody snitches on everybody else. Everybody is afraid of everybody else. Nobody can speak freely because they could get into trouble. These people want to control speech everywhere all the time.

What they are doing now is mind-bending. It has to be like living in the former Soviet Union. The lies are just monstrous. Ordinary law-abiding citizens are now a BIG THREAT. Don't take my word for it. Just pay attention to what they are saying out there. People voting for Trump are now considered "enemies of the people". They haven't said those words, but they are getting really, really close.

I don't know if I am on their radar, but I could be. Even a small-time blog like this. If something I wrote really bugged them enough, they could try to squash this blog. "They" means the same ones who cancel out everybody they don't like. The thing here is that they cannot be seen trying to cancel out THIS blog. If I thought my blog was safe because it was obscure, then maybe I was wrong. Just on the possibility that ONE person who could make a difference who read this blog and found something that could hurt them really badly. But they can never reveal that. After all, what the hell are they afraid of? An obscure blog? See what I mean?

2020 Election and 2000 Mules Back in the news; Bongino Show #1842

Bongino Show 8-31-22

A quickie post on this topic, as I haven't seen the entire video.

The first part of the show covers the cell phone location data used to prove election fraud in the Dinesh D'Souza film. Now the FTC sues a company that provides such data. ( Bongino notes: "just in time for the election.") You see, they want to stuff ballot boxes while nobody's looking. Also, some Reuters "fact checking" that denies cell phone data is accurate enough. However, if it isn't, then why is the FTC suing?

It is accurate enough, and law enforcement uses the data. The Biden Administration ( and they lackeys in the media) don't want anybody to KNOW the truth. So this is done in order to suppress the truth ( about the cell phone locations of ballot harvesters). They want no election integrity. They want to steal elections. Plain and simple.

NY Times says uproar over Trump raid simmering down

Simmering down?

The Times article is cited on a PJ Media, by the way. There are those who are suspcious of some of these people, or more than some of these people connected with Instapundit.

It's the New York Times, for cripe's sake. That's a partisan rag of partisan rags.

There's plenty of good posts out there that are increasing the doubts about this. This is no time to "simmer down". Who was the Times citing? I tried to read the Times article, but I won't sign up for their partisan rag. So I didn't read it. A bit of speculation here: It must be one of those "good Republicans" that is being cited by the partisan rag called the Times. That is, the good ones that Biden was talking about. The ones that won't fight back. EVER. It doesn't take much to simmer those people down. One wonders if they ever get mad about anything.

Over the course of time, the emotions will probably "simmer down". But what if this results in an indictment???? Is that going to cause things to "simmer down"? If a DC grand jury indicts, Trump is going to go before a partisan hack jury from a district that votes 90% Democrat. He won't get a fair trial. As for this raid, it wasn't up to snuff, either. "Simmering down" is definitely NOT the ticket.

But I can see the "good" Republicans rolling over like they always do. If anything, they should be uniting as one, because if they don't, nobody is going to vote for them. There'd be little point.

Update:

If this is true, whoa Nelly!

Comment:

The term "bombshell" is often used. This isn't a bombshell, it is Tsar Bomba! The mother of all bombs.

Basically what they're saying here is that they've got the crew that tried to get Trump all these years. They have got them dead to rights. The only thing protecting them is the power of the government.

That's the problem. If the power of the government is this corrupt, there is no way in hell that they are going to let that come to light. That's what makes it Tsar Bomba. It's going to blow it all to smithereens and back to yo' grandma; including cats, dogs, elephants, spiders, ants, and bedbugs.

Punishment for killing yellow jackets

Punishment for killing yellow jackets

This video just begs for a response. Not necessarily the video, but youtube's response to it. The response is straight out of the animal rights playbook. Which makes it a political act.

Shawn Woods makes these videos, and there are over 800 of these type of videos. He specializes in killing off pests. In case of these yellow jackets, they can be DANGEROUS. They make huge nests, and they are very aggressive. Even if you only get close to their nests, they will attack. There's no social redeeming value in defending these dangerous pests. But they do.

They have demonetized several of his videos. Just an opinion here: I think they went after him because he is good at what he does. They may have done this because the method of killing wasps was not only very effective, but it involves using automobile exhaust. Yep. You cannot approve of doing something helpful with the use of an internal combustion engine.

This video is an example of the lunacy of the left. Note: I use the word "left" because they call themselves that. It is fair game if they do. The same is true if those who call themselves "right" get called out. If you don't like that, they don't do it. It is a Marxist paradigm. Marxism is hostile to the American way of freedom.

Which reminds me, the "right" doesn't defend MAGA types who got slandered as semi-fascist. They join with the Democrats, just like Liz Cheney did. They really ought to consider this a slander of themselves as well. But maybe they agree with it. They've been rather quiet about it.

You have to call things by their right names. Youtube demonetized the video, and may ban it, because some looney tunes thought it was "animal cruelty". They'd rather see a child get stung to death by these aggressive wasps than to allow someone to post a video showing how they could be controlled easily and safely. This isn't animal cruelty. It is public safety. Only a lunatic could think otherwise. Youtube isn't doing a public service to ban videos that show the public how to rid themselves of dangerous pests.

Also, nobody has given YouTube authority to do this. They have immunity against lawsuits because they are supposed to be a neutral platform. This is decidedly not neutral. There has NEVER been any hint of politics from Shawn Woods.

Bongino 27:40 into video: "Can't continue like this"

FBI Trump Raid worse than you thought

Comment on video:

Don't want to distort what he says, but what he say should be startling. What exactly can't go on? The Republic. Something will carry on, but it will no longer be a Republic. That is, unless this changes. Frankly, there doesn't seems to be much movement to change course. Looking at some polls, it just isn't happening. Something needs to change, soon.



A few links:

Ex-FBI Intel Chief says DOJ has no case against Trump

Comment:

This should be no surprise. Even Strzok said in 2016 in reference to Russian collusion that there was no "there" there. There's never any "there" there. Same people, same tactics, same results. So far, it is all working like a charm.

Next!

Democrats defend Biden calling Republicans semi-fascist

Comment:

Why wouldn't Democrats defend this? It's what they've always done. They called George H.W. Bush Hitler. They called George W. Bush Hitler. Naturally, they'll call Trump another Hitler. Everything reduces to Hitler with these people. It works, so why not do it? Heck, even some GOP'ers will help them by calling themselves as being on the "right". With friends like these, who needs enemies? By the way, Biden was referring to MAGA Republicans. He made the distinction.

Next!

Big Tech bans Andrew Tate

Comment:

Big Tech is at it again. Since when did they get the authority to censor speech? Evidently, the GOP cannot find any issues to run on. They must be blind as a bat.

Necessity is the word

Anyone have "cobwebs" in their thinking?

A recent post about an atheist "progressive" seemed to be saying, it is okay to do unethical things in response to Trump. It reminded me of the interview of Al Capone, who responded that it was "necessary" for him to do the anti-social things he did. Nixon could have said the same during Watergate, but not even Nixon did that.

It was Harris' own words, and it was Al Capone's own words, that convict them of a crime. Capone was brought to justice, but this is much more difficult because it is wrapped up in politics. One thing that we know for sure, and the vast majority agree, that the suppression of Hunter Biden's laptop would have changed the outcome of the election. Not to mention that there WERE irregularities in the election. There were usurpations of the Constitution, which allowed electoral votes to be granted to Biden. It's all water under the bridge now, but the Supreme Court dropped the ball. It must not happen again.

The cobweb is about necessity. Why was it "necessary" to suppress the truth about Hunter Biden? Also, why is it "necessary" to falsely accuse patriots of insurrection for doing nothing but protest the way the entire controversy was handled? Supposedly, those who claim that they are defending "democracy" and the "rule of law" are not doing that. Certainly, the "mother of invention" could have been applied to the situation, as opposed to the "father of crime." This must not be confirmed as the new way.

There is still a chance to rectify this, but we'd better get it right. That chance is at the ballot box. There is a possibility, though, that the same forces that claimed necessity required them to forego election integrity will force them to do it again.

The "necessity" that they claim is to prevent authoritarianism, they say. It is to stop "semi-fascists" says Biden. If you can demonize your opponents this much, you can rationalize anything. But there is no necessity but to get at the truth of the situation. Is the process an honest one, or is it corrupt? If it is corrupt, what can we do about it? The current group of people in charge won't even look.  But they will order a panty raid on a political opponent who has beaten them before.

Invoking Marxist ideology to rile up the Democrat base does not inspire confidence. Somehow, the public is going to have sort this out and deliver the correct outcome in November. Unless this happens, the transgressions will get worse.

Jul 26, 2021

In the book linked to below, the co-author, Napoleon Hill recounts his interview with the vicious gangster--- Al Capone. Something in that interview I'd like to discuss, which I believe could be useful in understanding what's happening in the world today.

Hill asked Capone why he lived the gangster's life, and Capone replied that he "had to". Capone was explaining away all the anti-social things he did because of necessity. Hill went on to comment that necessity is "the mother of invention, and the father of crime". Nothing can force you to be dishonest. There is no force on Earth that can make you be dishonest. It is your choice. You can die or suffer terribly rather than be dishonest, if that is your moral code.

Like Capone, many people who choose such a path, will explain it all away by claiming that as a reason. Actually, if you look into history, you can find that the Communists in the former Soviet Union, said exactly the same thing. For this reason, President Reagan called them the "Evil Empire". For they will justify evil on the basis of this, which they excuse or rationalize away as "necessity".

The same will always be true for those who take the same path. The tree is definitely judged by its fruit. The fruit of communism has always been misery. There is no rationalizing that away. The book being referred to is immediately below:

Success Through a Positive Mental Attitude