Because they aren't conservative

Bush Republicans have failed.

Comment:

Widespread disenchantment with the RINOS.

This has been true for a very long time. Unless this piece is more than mere polemics, it isn't going to be any different going forward. Something has to be done, or we are.

What kind of world will they inherit?

The medical professional I saw today wasn't a doctor. She was a nurse practicioner. I believe that is the term. So, this nurse practicioner is pregnant. She was pretty nice about my "vaccine hesitancy". But what if the discussion turned into a debate?

If it did, I wonder if I would have thought of something to say that may have made her sit up and take notice... She's pregnant. She told me that the "vaccines" are safe and all. She gave me something of a practiced speech, I gather. Maybe she has been coached on what to say to people like me.

Now the point is this: does she really believe what she is telling me? I wonder about that too, because these people are wearing masks, but when I walked in, one of them wasn't. She put her mask on when I walked up. Do they really believe in these masks? You see stuff like that all the time. If they really don't believe the masks are any help at all, and if what she says is only because she has to in order to keep her job, what does that say about the future? She is with child. Does she realize what kind of world this child will inherit if something is very wrong in the country right now?

There are other questionable things. The way the commies talk is hateful. These people are as full of hate as they can be. That too should concern anyone like her who has a child coming. If I had thought of this, would that have gotten her attention? The talk very hatefully towards white people. Do they have genocide in mind?

Perhaps this isn't saying it well enough. Words can sometimes fail. Let's try this: the way she talked is that the world will be about the way it is now in two or three years. I would have to say no, there is something very wrong here. If it isn't stopped real soon, the future will not be so kind as she may be taking for granted. This hatefulness is sweeping everything away. The world this child inherits won't be the one the mother grew up in. Be very careful about what you do in relation to what the world is putting in front of us right now. Those with young children should be very concerned about that.

It probably wouldn't have made any difference at all. But what else can you do?

Testing assumptions

 

Today was the long dreaded doctor's visit. But it wasn't all that bad. Sure, there were moments that I wouldn't have wanted to have to endure, but it wasn't the worst possible thing.

There are those, who I call commies these days, would have wished some really bad stuff on me. You see, commies just don't care. If you were to die, that would be alright by them. For commies, some people will just have to die. In commie parlance, they would be "liquidated". We haven't used that kind of language before in the USA, but we are on track for that to start.

Whenever somebody resorts to force to settle an issue, they are acting like commies. You tow the line or else. The "or-else" part is the part they really mean. They WILL do that. Their very raison d'etre is that it is necessary to use force on people. Reason doesn't fit into their scheme. Reason is so bourgeous, and so yesterday ( for them). They are the enlightened ones, you see. If you don't agree, they will be entirely happy to bash your head in. Then you will be enlightened, if you survive.

But what happens when people are insufficiently scared shitless of them? They have a problem and they know it. Their power is being dissed. That means a whole lot of terror needs to be reintroduced because the "masses" aren't sufficiently scared. You can bet that will change, or a whole lot of people are going to get dead fast.

This may seem non-intuitive, but the best way to handle these types is let them do their damnedest. If they kill everybody, they won't have anyone else to rule. That's why they would be in so much trouble if everyone lost their fear of them. That's what they need to rule. Without it, they are nothing. Too bad that there are too few people who recognize that. Otherwise, this covid nonsense would not have lasted this long.

I didn't have to be brave today, but the day is coming. Maybe sooner than we all think. I hope not, but I try to live in Realville.

Is USA kaput?

 

If it depended upon anything I said here on this blog, I'd say yep, we're done. Evidently, my force of reason doesn't go far.

Today was a discouraging day all around. Sure, there's a symposium going on. Yes, it is good. The evidence is overwhelming. But I get this feeling in the pit of my stomach that it will not lead to anything.

It is discouraging that this happens. It is like the wolf and the lamb fable of Aesop's fables. Force has the better of the argument because those who COULD do something WON'T. That's the way of the world, or so it seems. I've seen it before. Up close and personal. No argument can change the nature of things as they are no matter how much you may want it to be otherwise.

But I go on. For me, it is now just a matter of damned cussedness. Mine and theirs. I don't expect to win, but I won't surrender even if it kills me. Maybe I got a streak of Cool Hand Luke. But not the results, just the pain.

For those who think this will have a Hollywood ending of the kind that is a happy ending, I hope that you are right. I hope that I'm wrong. But it doesn't look good. Being right doesn't do a damned thing for me, in this case. I might luck out and lose the political game, but it won't hurt me, like that cancer thing. Life takes strange bounces, and so could this.

Obligatory, 4.15.20

Update:

Everybody was talking about the cheat long before it occurred.  Here's the deal:  the GOP didn't do anything to stop it nor will they do anything to rectify it now that it has happened.

Why they have any political support at all means that we the people don't give a hoop either.

The cure is worse than the disease. Seems like I wrote something like that when this whole thing started. I think I wrote that I was worried more about what people did about this Wuhan thing than the Wuhan thing itself. Lo and behold, here it is. People have really lost it.

Last night, I had a thought about the Heisenberg Principle. That principle says that if you observe a "quantum" state, you end up changing it. Yep, we need that now. We need to be outside the state in order to see how dumb it is, and that will change it. Another way of putting it: "step outside the box."

People are in a self-induced trance. They are locked down into it like they are locked down inside their homes. Step outside and get some fresh air. This is dumb.

By the way, Wishbone said that Llano county is holding at three cases. I thought the Slimes was putting that behind a paywall. I think they are, but you can get around it if you get rid of their cookies. But that is a theory. I used my netbook to access the site, as opposed to the Android, and I got behind their paywall. Take that, you Slimes!

It is at three still this am. People in this county are wearing masks for something that is almost a million to one possibility. Beam me up, Scottie!

I'd like to see the GOP fight back. Too many of them are surrendering to the left. But that is how it always is, now isn't it?

Pelosi wants to push mail-in ballots. I say all GOP controlled states should cast their electoral votes NOW. It would be constitutional. There's nothing in the Constitution that requires that people vote for POTUS. The POTUS is elected by State Legislatures. Since the GOP controls the states, or once did, they could own the Presidency.

If the GOP did that, they would be acting like Democrats. Democrats are acting in purely self-interested ways. How do you fight that? By giving them back the same treatment in-kind. If they can cheat, so can we!

That might sound insane. But given the current state of insanity, you might have to step outside the box.

Collyfornia didn't get what they thought they were getting (typo corrected)

 

The Governator buys into the Commie Covid Hoax

California is holding a recall. With respect to recall, there was one in which Schwarzenegger won and became governor of "Collyfornia". He got elected, and maybe even reelected, but he sure didn't fix anything while he was there. How come?

The problem with the land of fruits and nuts is that it is governed by commies. Schwarzenegger thought he was escaping commies when he left Austria for the USA. But he brought the commie mindset with him. The commie mindset doesn't seem to grasp truth very well. If it doesn't comport with what they want to believe, they'll resort to lies. Check out what Lenin said if you don't believe that.

But Arnold just doesn't get it. He buys into their pretenses--- hook, line, and sinker. As Einstein once said, "the mind that created the problem cannot solve it." The reason that The Governator couldn't terminate the communism that is destroying communism California is that his mind hasn't left the commie commune. He latches on to their phony slogans the way that flies are attracted to manure.

If he couldn't cure Collyfornia of communism, while should anybody listen to him about this commie hoax now?

Commie lies

 

The commies hysterically chant insurrection, but wait....

Pravda media

"Russian disinformation" the Pravda media hysterically claimed.

The Pravda media claims lots of things.

Covid 19 virus not isolated in lab?

Update:

Vaccine hesitancy did begin with commies.

Here's a repost that illustrates that fact.

This post was originally published here on Oct 24th 2020.

NO actual isolation of the COVID-19 virus-- according to this article

Is the COVID-19 really a hoax after all? Something amazing has just popped up on my radar screen. It hasn't been discussed immediately because at the moment, I am experiencing technical difficulties. I've spent the better part of this Saturday morning attempting to get on the internet. It won't work properly. I do have some connectivity through my phone. So here goes.

If COVID-19 is truly a fake, then there can be no vaccine for it. Do you realize what that means?!?

Think about this... Why would the Democrats say that they would want to avoid the vaccine? Do they know something we don't know? In other words, could the "vaccine" be a hoax too? If the Democrats know that the COVID-19 "pandemic" was a scam, then they could also know that the "vaccine" is a scam. It could be WORSE than a scam. It could be a design to POISON and KILL MILLIONS of people!

Red flashing lights are blinking on the dashboard here. Given the amazing amount of sheer mendacity of significant portions of our government, I think people should take a very hard look at what is going on here. Your life could be at stake.

This article here states that they CDC NEVER ISOLATED THE VIRUS which is called COVID-19. THEY ONLY ASSUMED its existence. That's right. If you query the CDC, according to this article, you won't get anything from the CDC that proves of the VIRUS' actual existence. It was put together with a computer model. That's it! A computer model.

People are too trusting. Me too. I've been saying all along that I was skeptical of the "pandemic", but not of the virus itself. This article questions the EXISTENCE of it completely. Now they say that the CDC has not actually isolated any of the virus samples?!? How do we know for the fact that it actually exists except for their word?

Whoa, nelly! Back this thing up. I got the link from the barnhardt.biz website. Click on the "Lew Rockwell" link. I would put up the link

Fake all around

Fake testing for a fake vaccine for a fake virus

Rappoport has a worthy read at the link. The FDA trials for the miscalled "vaccine" were fake. They were fake because they fudged the numbers. "Cases" are defined as anybody who tests positive for a PCR that gives way too many false positives. But during the trials for efficacy and safety, the FDA fudges the numbers again, and claims those really weren't cases. The "vaccine" never worked.

As he mentioned before, he said that the CDC itself has never isolated the virus. We don't even know that the virus even exists.

Sounds like the whole thing is a set up. We're the patsies. Maybe, just maybe, people out there will get tired of being patsies for these fakes. But I won't bet the farm on it.

Get focused

So much said on the conservative side seems to be a total waste of time. It seems like the focus is on stuff that doesn't matter.

For instance, the polls don't matter if the elections are rigged anyway. It doesn't matter that you win an election if the election can be stolen. According to Lindell's Symposium, EVERY COUNTY in the USA was hacked. What????? Repeat EVERY COUNTY IN THE USA WAS HACKED.

Step aside for a moment and evaluate what that means, if true. If it is true, then no amount of argumentation is going to make any difference at all. The elections are rigged. Then why waste time trying to argue something that won't make any difference anyway?

It seems that the focus is misplaced. We ought to find out if that is true or not. If it is true, then no office-holder is legitimate. If there are no honest elections, we don't have a democracy AT ALL. We have no Republic at all. WE HAVE NOTHING.

Maybe that will wake up some of your asses. But not betting the farm on it.

Up the infamous creek without a paddle

 

The question is posed here. The question is brought because if the Chinese control everything, or eventually control everything, then this question must be asked. Are we finished? Is the USA cooked?

If I thought so, I would quit. I am not convinced of that yet, but to tell youse people the truth, it isn't looking good.

The signs are all around of what's going on. If nobody heeds the warnings, the warnings are not going to do any good. I can stand on top of the housetop, and scream my lungs out, and if nobody listens, then nothing good can come from it. I'd probably get arrested for my trouble.

I've warned about communism. That warning seems to be met with indifference. I have warned about the GOP. Same thing. Now Lindell is out there warning about the previous election, and warning about the Chinese, and warning about foreign domination. Will people pay any attention?

The key players have to pay attention. If those in key positions are bought off, then we can't expect anything good coming out of them. Those in key positions now are in the State Houses throughout the country. If the key issue isn't communism, then it might be freedom from foreign domination. Maybe THAT might get their attention. Maybe not. One thing is sure, it had better get moving because time is running out.

Article V con-con

The situation is careening towards... what exactly? Briefly, the situation is that more and more challenges are being made to the outcome of the 2020 election. Lindell has his symposium going. If he can persuade more people to join him, the pressure will grow on more of the states to do more audits... and then what?

There has to be an end game, but what is that exactly? Has anybody defined it? Will the states that certified the results somehow decertify them? If they did, what would this mean? There is no legal obligation of the Congress to revisit the situation. Biden is President, and there is only one way to force him out. Or is there?

But to force him out brings in Kamala Harris. She would be just as illegitimate as he is. From the looks of things, she would also be even less popular and less suitable than Ill Duce.

But if the states decertify and the Congress ignores it, then what? Will the states allow themselves to be overriden by a recalcitrant Federal government? The states DO have the authority to call for an Article V convention here. The matter could be settled there if the Congress will not properly address it. If those who are pushing this thing aren't prepared to push for an Article V convention of states, then what is this all about? How do you redress a grievance that has no method of redress?

If the significance of it all is that the states and the people are asserting themselves, it all seems very tentative. Perhaps it would help if the purpose of all of this is stated clearly and unambiguously?

Lindell's video on CTH via Rumble should scare people into action.

Will it?

An amusing thought

After the previous post about propaganda, the thought came to me to suggest something that is amusing to me. The amusing thing is that people don't really want the truth. Now I think I provide that, but since my audience is so small, I think that nobody visits here because it it is too truthful. See what I mean?

If anyone doesn't think that, submit your reasons why in a comment. If you restrict yourself and restrain yourself from calling names and doing other things that people do when they don't want truth, but propaganda, I will approve the comment. Namecalling is just one of the tools of propaganda. It would be hard to leave that out, amongst other propaganda gimmicks.

Propaganda is really intended to elicit an emotional response. If you want a reasoned discussion, propaganda is not your thing. Most people would rather bash those they don't like.

Such an offer is not likely to be accepted. In fact, it is exactly what I've been doing all along. Lots of hits on my commentary rules, but few take me up on the offer. Hence, I have a justified reason for believing that nobody is much interested in the truth.

It is amusing indeed.

brick in the wall pink floyd

Propaganda

Propaganda is the word today. I won't be linking to any sources, but there are a few out there in case anybody's interested.

Propaganda is defined loosely as bias. The news media, which is called here "Pravda" media, has been called biased for years. However, it is not necessarily called propaganda. It may be time to start calling it that.

Propaganda has not always been looked upon with disfavor. Think of it as an advocacy project, and you might not be far wrong. Nothing is wrong with advocacy. The thing that is wrong is to misrepresent it as anything else. Therefore, to mislabel propaganda as "news" is fraudulent. I don't know if truth in advertising applies to the media, but it should. Something that does not allow for another viewpoint that is in opposition to the one expressed cannot be called news, if there is to be any truth in advertising.

The Pravda propaganda complex should be required to label itself as such. At least, when you view it, you will know that what you're viewing isn't "news". An example of the type of reaction you might have is to note what your reaction is to the Russian "news" network--RT. The only way I would watch it is to get their viewpoint. It isn't necessarily MY viewmpoint, you see. By the way, you can count on one hand the number of times that I've gone there. That might be an overestimate, if you catch my drift.

But I don't watch CNN either. Or Fox, or any TV at all. That doesn't mean I don't partake in the propaganda. But nothing I watch claims to be THE NEWS. The label "news" is the most misrepresented term out there. The term news implies impartiality. Anybody who thinks the news media is impartial is not a serious person.

Informed consent

 Giving the jab doesn't meet that test.

The National Institute of Health has it on its website.

How can they mandate it when this isn't being addressed?

Update

Ill Duce is ordering the military to get the jab.

If the jab doesn't have informed consent, it is not a legal order. Illegal orders don't have to be obeyed.

Coming to a country near YOU

Lenin's Red Terror very similar to what we see in America today.

This article appears to me to be right on the money.

Too many people just don't get it. By the time they do, and they will eventually get it, it will be too late.

But the warnings will continue here in any case.

Conspiracy against rights

Conspiracy against rights example.

Conspiracy against rights alleged fact-check during 2020 campaign.

Conspiracy against rights in US Code.

The link above describes a scenario for which a law exists to protects the rights of citizens to exercise their rights. It is called "conspiracy against rights" if memory serves. Nobody has the right to throw flash-bombs at people holding religious services.

Such should be referred to the so-called Department of Justice for prosecution, but there are those who were said to have claimed that Antifa was just an idea. If Ill Duce condemned Antifa during the 2020 campaign, as this "fact-check" claims, then a prosecution should be forthcoming.

Somehow, I don't expect that to happen. This has the hallmarks of a war. There is a two-tiered justice system, and that is the hallmark of communism. In communism, the members of the party receive privileges that the non-members don't. Even though everyone is supposed to be equal, some people are more equal than others. The communists are waging war against the public, and there's nobody in DC willing to do anything about it.

Of course, the MIA miscalled opposition party could say something, but I wouldn't bet the farm on that either.

Ayatollas of corona

are issuing new fatwas of flatulence

Just overhead someone talking on the telephone about waht is happening in Austin. They are going bat guano over there with restrictions again...

There isn't authority to do this, I would think. The Gov. said none of that business again, but if the reports are accurate, they are disregarding him.

This may be an archaic term, but I'll use it here. Back in the old days, if war was a possibility you would hear a term regarding the DEFCON level. A DEFCON 1 scenario means hostilities are ongoing. DEFCON 5 would be normal, or close to normal. What level are we on now?

If the pinkos get their way, a shot won't have to be fired. Freedom may require a DEFCON a bit more towards the hostility level. Not advocating violence, ya pinkos. Don't read anything into this. But things may get a bit testy.

Update:

I did a cursory check of the news, and I found one story to that effect, but it was in a Dallas school district.

No smokies

There was an article that I read just now, and it was linked from a blog that I read sometimes. I want to comment on that article a bit. Actually, I only got a paragraph into the article when it reminded me of something that I've been thinking about lately. That something was the 55 mph speed limit imposed during the Energy Crisis of the early 1970's.

The said article asserted that we cannot "obey our way back to normalcy". Indeed! This was in response to the latest call for more lockdowns and such in response to the covid fake "pandemic".

There are some similarities between the two eras. The Energy Crisis days were the days when Big Government was trying to put an end to Big Oil. Big Oil was supposed to be at the root of our troubles, but as Ronald Reagan said at the time--Big Government wasn't the solution, it was the problem.

The people back then didn't obey quite so much either. The 55 mph speed limit started its own movement in the culture. The movement was resistance to the overly restrictive speed limit. Movies were made about it. The one that may be the most memorable was "Smokey and The Bandit".

It wasn't framed that way, but it was civil disobedience to the 55 mph speed limit. For anybody not familiar, the plot revolved around "The Bandit" getting past the determined "Smokey", who was trying to jail him for driving too fast. The Bandit got away, and the The Smokey was left with a police car reduced to junk in his quest to catch up and jail the Bandit.

One scene that I remember is seeing the price of gasoline back then. It seemed high at the time, but it seems really low now, about 50 cents a gallon.

It was all about evading the law, which was erroneously enforcing an unnecessary law, which was intended to solve a problem that did not exist. There was no Energy Crisis. It was a Government Crisis, but it didn't get promoted that way. It took Reagan to end the miscalled Energy Crisis, which was solved by getting the government out of the oil business.

If we can get Big Government out of our business, I think we'll all be a lot better off. It happened before, so let us hope that we can make it happen again. The alternative isn't a pretty one.

Cuba

Some young men visited Cuba, and this is what they found.



Comment:

Yours truly thought all of what they discussed was common knowledge. Evidently, there is a lot of propaganda in favor of Cuba in the USA. That's what this video is about, it is showing the other side that the commies don't want you to see.

Staying alive in a war

If you really believe that you are in a war, it will tend to focus your attention where it needs to be. The object of the enemy is to kill and destroy. Your object is to keep on surviving.

There is an old World War II instructional video that is on YouTube. You can bet your sweet bippy that those who had to go fight would've paid attention because a failure to do so would contribute greatly to one's own death out on the battlefield. That video is just as valid in our current situation as it was during that war, provided that we are in a true wartime scenario.

The war, as such as it is, is not at the shooting stage. It may never get there because it may be avoided altogether. One of the things that is taught by Sun Tsu in the Art of War is that the best war is one that doesn't have to be fought. If you can subdue the enemy without firing a shot, it is the supreme skill of the warfighter to have achieved this result. Now suppose this hypothetical: what if there really is an effort to subdue us all without ever firing a shot? The commies in the Cold War claimed over and over again their intention to do so.

What do you do then? All around is evidence that a war is being waged against us all, but nobody seems to be able to muster the effort necessary to defend themselves against the onslaught.

Like the video said, the enemy doesn't kill you, your ignorance and foolishness is what kills you. To that end, and since I do not wish to be an unwitting accomplice to my own demise, I will prepare myself for this war. Anybody who wishes to live as long as it is possible under such a scenario might be wise to do so as well.

One way to know is to check info veracity. If a source is not telling you the truth, that is a great big red flag. As Sun Tsu said in the Art of War, warfare is all about deception. When somebody is lying, something is up.

How do you know if someone is lying? Being wrong about something is not lying. Being wrong when you know you are wrong, and in the effort to cause harm to another, is indeed lying. I think that if you follow that rule, you can distinguish between friend or foe. Most folks don't know what the truth is, so they have depend upon others for information. Therefore, the sources of information must be checked and double checked for accuracy at all times.

That might sound like a effort at censorship. In a shooting war, there will indeed be censorship. As of this time, therefore, any attempt to censor VALID information is to viewed with extreme suspicion. Based upon what I've heard about BIG TECH, they are censoring just about anything that doesn't further a political objective. BIG TECH should be avoided. Aside from that, I couldn't tell friend from foe, but BIG TECH should not be censoring anybody at all because they are supposed to be a neutral party.

Now read this: NIH Informed consent study 

It looks like it is valid to me because it has "nih.gov". That might not be a correct assumption, but the deal is that this is what the government is saying. If BIG TECH censors this, then what does that say?

Also on NIH: What is informed consent according to Nuremberg Code?