Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
What might be news is that Cuber will suffer, cuz Venezuela was helping to keep Cuber afloat.
Of course commies oppose the action, so they are screaming the loudest. Boo-hoo.
The complaint is that Trump didn't consult with the commies. Why? They probably would've done everything they could to stop it, and if it got anybody killed, they'd blame Trump for it.
So, I'm glad he did it.
Don't give a flip if the commies don't like it. Anything that helps the country, they oppose anyway. So, eff 'em.
Description: From Mr Robot season 1 Episode 6 "eps1.5_br4ve-trave1er.asf"
Why include this? Sick shit as evidence of a sick society. Why else? There are those who would pretend otherwise, but not here.
Now in the database...
10/11/23:
daily updates(2):
Phishing expedition...
end update (2):
Update of post of 10/8/23:
Not a whole lot out there to do, so here's another Mr. Robot video.
Why put this up? Well, it is said to be "realistic", with respect to hacking. Also, I can comment on the thing as well. For one, there's a scene in this video that is disgusting. Why include it? I guess that's being realistic too. But it isn't very pleasant. Now that I managed to turn off any interest that may have existed in watching the vid, here's it is.
end update:
I don't watch much television. Up until today, I never heard of this show. I've looked at a few videos and some descriptions of this show,
and my curiosity is piqued. Why does the main character turn down this "invitation"?
I'd have to research his character a lot further to come to a definite opinion.
Some might regard him as a hero. Based upon what I've researched, he may have crossed some lines that should not be crossed. Making him out to be a hero may be a mistake.
Update a little later: I've lost interest. It appears to be a mental thing with that character.
List of 20 Trump accomplishments in 2025. It also links to 10 not-so-good things Trump did.
Here's a fallacy for ya. Why is it fair to NOT list the mitigating reasons for the so-called not-so-good things?
I think it is some sort of misplaced sense that you've got to be "fair" to the other side of the argument. Why? The other side is not exactly fair themselves. Besides, if there ARE mitigating circumstances, why in the hell is that somehow UNFAIR to the other side? The fact is that it ISN'T.
If you really support Trump, you'd stop rushing to try to gain approval of his critics when his critics are not in the least interested in being fair about anything at all.
Limit Who? Limit the people. Wrong. The US Constitution was written to control GOVERNMENT, not the the PEOPLE. Looks like another one of those $64k questions that aren't really $64k questions. Why are they so hell-bent on taking away freedoms, while at the same time proclaiming their love of the law, and of Democracy? The answer SHOULD be obvious.
Think about this. There was no personal income tax until the early 20th Century. That's when the big wars started. Not a coincidence, there. If the people decided, the chance for war would be much reduced. People would rather go
about their business, as opposed to fighting in some war.
Communism posits that there must be a dictatorship of the proletariat. You cannot advocate contradictory things and be telling the truth. It's never what they say it is about. Commies also believe that morality is a bourgeois value. The implications of that should also be obvious.
Why in the world does the political left want to ban guns, when the bad guys are getting their guns from Federal Money? Why is that?
You could answer that question very easily. But to do so would require you to understand what is really going on in this country. It's not about public safety. It's never about what the left says its about. There are ulterior motives, because the motives they give just don't add up.
Incidentally, what makes it a $64k question? Aren't those kind of questions hard to answer? This one isn't really hard, but for some people, it sure does seem to be. Or is it hard to answer at all? Perhaps they're just lying about it being hard. After all, they probably know EXACTLY what they're doing and why. No, the problem is a psychological one. You cannot answer an obviously easy question because you would have to confront something that scares you so badly that you don't want to confront it.
MTG is no longer MAGA. She has strayed off into leftist Lulu-land. Now she wants to run against MAGA, and force defeat upon the MAGA agenda. Why? Because she was passed by, not on principle. She was always an opportunist. She HAS no principles. Don't be fooled by her, or her kind.
MTG probably has her defenders. Just saw one of Free Republic.
At best, MTG has made a strategic blunder of the highest order.
In any case, she has gone to the other side, and is now running against the leader of MAGA. This is in principle, no different from what Benedict Arnold did, nor any different from Judas Iscariot.
Now I can just see how that argument will be twisted into something not intended. So be it. Those who decide to go to the other side will no longer have a voice in our house.
The point being, that dissent is certainly allowed, but not desertion in favor of the enemy. To say otherwise is to deny the existence of an enemy.
Personally, I have not known too many Jews, so I don't know their thinking on this on a personal level. However, the one Jewish guy I knew made it very clear that he supports Israel.
Now, as an American, and a pro-American, who would you rather align with? A democratically elected Jewish state, or one of the repressive types of states in the Mideast that opposes Israel? To me, it is a no-brainer. I am on the side of Israel. They are the wronged party since the October terrorist event.
Any time things get a bit too serious, it may be time for a joke. Oh, what the hell. A joke is good any old time.
9.16.13:
Note:
I went to the doctor today, and she asked "do you feel angry?" I said yes, a little. She asked me what I did about it. I told her usually I keep it in, but when I really get mad, I start yelling. So, she said "don't get mad, find a better way to handle it." So, I've been thinking about that all day today. Finally, I resolved to laugh it all off. Humor works. Here's a video repost of a scene in Anger Management.
I don't think I try to sing this song in a traffic jam, though. This is Texas, you know.
A funny film, but there were one too many scenes. The last scene in the movie could have been taken out. It wasn't a bad scene, but it may have been slightly better if it wasn't in there. Kinda like overkill.
Note: the clip below ain't that scene. But you probably already knew that.
A fundamental concept here. If most everything you see from the talking heads, and the so-called pundits is nothing but a psy-op, then you may be on to a fundamental TRUTH, which could set you free.
Corporations are not our friend, as they are the tools of government. Corporations are artificial entities created by governments. How then can they serve the people? They serve themselves, and those who created them in the first place.
Here's this video, which has some ideas I think are worth sharing. It is very much out of the "mainstream", but to me, the "mainstream" sucks. So, I could care less about the so-called mainstream.
Que sera, sera baby. I'm not going to allow it to disturb my peace. My peace comes from making my best arguments. Let everybody make their best arguments.
As for Jack Smith, and his commie handlers; they are a given. There's absolutely no hope for them. But the others? Only a sliver. But they are using up what little credibility they have for what exactly? So that the commies can regain power?
An example would be George Will. George Will actively rooted for Mamdami, for cripes sake. He is against Trump, even though Trump won the election; and is the commander in chief. Unfortunately, the window of opportunity for such is closing fast. At some point, you have to decide. Hopefully, for us all, the majority chooses wisely.
There wasn't a post about it yesterday, but there was indeed some research on some of this discord in the GOP lately.
It seemed like a nothingburger to me.
But some folks insist that there's a problem. Yes, there is! The problem is that you won't be satisfied no matter what happens. I think that some of you would complain if the Second Coming occurred. You'd probably bitch that was too little or too late.
Some folks cannot be happy because they insist on being unhappy.
Words, logic, reason will not matter in those cases. They might as well be liberals themselves. They sure as hell act that way.
A sudden realization is that I may wish for a Brave New World. Not exactly. John Savage wanted to be left alone. But the world wouldn't let him. Up to a point, there should be freedom, but there is a limit to everything. For if there are no limits, then what? Anarchy? What will be the limits, then? Perhaps that is what the argument is really all about.
The political left wants limits. But so do their opponents. Only the anarchists want no limits at all. Still others wouldn't be happy even if they got all their wishes. It takes all kinds to make up the world.
Description: "The Official Music Video for The Bug. Taken from Dire Straits – On Every Street."
12/3/25:
I like the line in Cheers, where Norm says "It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I'm wearing Milk-bone underwear". This song says the same thing, but in a different way. You're the windshield or the bug. Man, I feel like the bug today.
This song popped into my head. I knew I had posted it before...if memory serves, I was feeling poorly at that time..
Felt a lot better today. Got out a bit and heard this one on the radio as before. Why not repost it? I like it... original post follows immediately...
Just heard this on the radio while in my Nissan. The hubcaps arrived this morning, or should I say last night, but the delivery guy didn't knock or anything. I didn't know that they were there. So, the hubcaps are on the car, and it should be good enough for the inspection sticker I couldn't get last week. My permanent license should be there tomorrow, but if not, no problema. I'll just have to make another trip.
Anyway, that song was familiar from the nineties, but I didn't know the name of it, nor the artists.
I found the lyrics and notice how clean they are. That was rare even 20 years ago.
Description: SpaceX Starship Updates, near the end of 2025. SpaceX continues to demolish the original launch mount, and prepare to upgrade it in order to accommodate the latest designs of the Version 3 Booster, and Starship.
Speculation: Could be a psy-op to depress MAGA enthusiasm. Also to boost left-wing enthusiasm.
Somebody wants the Dems to win real badly, and it may not necessarily be all Democrats. Also,
consider the source --- Bloomberg. Quoted a Heritage "hard-liner". Why use these type of
persuader words? The idea is to give it more credibility, when there could be reason to
doubt it.
Poll numbers ARE indeed down. That is why some type of action is necessarily in order to stem
these losses, and even turn them back around.
This one was on the radio, and seemed like a good idea to include it in the database. Better yet, include it as a
reaction video, and here is a favorite presenter-- "The Charismatic Voice". The song is quite relatable, as yours truly spent a crap-load of time trying to learn to be a guitar player too. Ah, but it didn't work out; as many other things didn't, alas...
Been checking music videos and I remembered this one...
Surprising reactions to this song from some folks...
Somebody said it saved them from committing suicide.
Originally posted on Dec 12, 2011
Dumb joke alert:
What did one bug on the windshield say to another bug on the windshield? Bet you don't have the guts to do that again!
Update:
I took a screen shot of this guy flying by his buddy. The speed is tremendous, he's there and then he is gone. His buddy had to duck, so you can see how close he is to the ground and going so fast. Dangerous stuff!
"Over the past two years, farmers across Europe have mobilized at a scale ; that should dominate headlines. Instead,
it has been treated as background noise."
Europe and America, as well as the rest of the so-called "free world" are destroying themselves, but why? To solve
imaginary problems with imaginary solutions.
What's the reaction of the controlled opposition? Raise phony issues and try to divide itself so that it can lose
the next election to the ones at the source of the trouble.
Makes me wonder who and what these people are protecting.
Since this Epstein stuff started, I've been eyeing the re-establishment of the Political WTF category. Indeed, what the f**k are we doing to each other? So many good things are happening, but people are unhappy? WHY?... It makes no sense, unless...
The 64K question is why. And the 64K quote here is this:
Traditional Republicans want a midterm loss.
I've got news for you people, or perhaps you already know. This has always been the case. In 1964, the liberal wing of the GOP voted for LBJ. Since that time, the rails have gotten greased towards more and more government.
Traditional Republicans aren't interested in being an opposition party. That election in 1964 proved it. Nothing has changed.
MTG is still a fake. She's trying to pre-empt any mention of her in the campaign for her replacement. This is a controlled opposition move. Run like hell against her, and the rest of the fakes. Anti-MAGA types would rather lose than to win, for if they win, they'd have to govern. They'd much rather be a controlled opposition. Screw that!
