I just watched a hour and a half long video about Clinton's history with regards to women. It seems to be rather monstrous to compare Cain with Clinton. I won't put the video up because the longer it went on, the more partisan it seemed to get. I don't think that most people are capable of believing all that which I saw on that video. The point is that Cain can't be anything like Clinton. If he was, he'd had a lot more stories he'd have to quiet down.
Clinton's need to silence damaging information was so strong that it appears to be criminal in nature. Whether or not you want to believe it, the guy at the very least got caught in a blatant lie. That's the part that could be proven without doubt. But what about all the rest, including the most lurid stories of murder or attempted murder? What about rape?
Why compare Cain with Clinton? Some people are. I'd have to say that the comparison is not at all apt. Any attempt at making comparisons is contemptuous. And get this, these comparisons are coming from people on the right. If this was coming from the left, I wouldn't be surprised. And to think, this is what we have to oppose the Democrats and Obama. It is depressing.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
No comments:
Post a Comment