Let's make it short and sweet. The theory is this: firmness. The Republicans have to stay firm and not make compromises. If there are to be compromises, the compromises must be limited and get real benefits--- not just promises.
Remember George Bush as being stubborn? He was a two-term president. That's a success that Republicans should embrace, but they run from it. Compare Bush with Romney. Romney starts off on the right foot with the Benghazi thing, then he goes soft. He should have stayed firm. He lost. Another example: Arnold Swarzenegger. He starts off like a lion and ends up as meek as a mouse hiding out in his little hidey hole. The Governator wasn't a success in governance because he wasn't firm. He did get re-elected--- but for what? Ronald Reagan was pretty firm. He did make compromises, and some of them weren't good. On the whole, though, he was firm.
There's a word for it: "squishes". Too many squishes in the Republican party. Got to firm up those squishes.
No comments:
Post a Comment