- strong v weak interactions
- strong interactions are related to weapons programs
- weak interactions weren't considered useful for bombs, nor for power generation
- "cold fusion" was thought to be another strong interaction, but it isn't
- "cold fusion" isn't fusion
- Fleischmann and Pons didn't have a theory to explain the phenomenon
- explains theory - no new physics, existing physics put together in a novel way
- weak interactions produce neutrinos- nature produces them all the time
- collective effects
- in a chemical cell, ie battery, run a current through it, will cause weak interactions
- saturate metal with hydrogen, drops appear on surface, in this droplets a coupling occurs, protons and electrons combine ; [comment: beta decay results and produces the energy]
- no gamma rays- don't need shielding and containment
- like a battery, but lasts a long time, portable products can be made
- more you make of these, the cheaper they get, like PC's [ comment: comparison with Moore's Law]
- use variety of fuels, will cause energy to become cheap and affordable
- discussion of benefits of cheap energy
- Nasa studying it- physics are correct, a matter of engineering now
- interdisciplinary theory partly responsible for nonacceptance, but no flaws found yet
- sometimes effects are not understood at first, Faraday example
- stop at 35 minutes, but there's more. I'm stopping to post this. You need to listen to this.
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Widom Larsen Theory LENRs . . . Energy Revolution? with Lewis Larsen President of Lattice Energy
excerpts: (video is about an hour long)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment