As most everyone not living under a rock might know, Donald Trump was indicted again. Rather than to react, I decided not to react to it here, and wait awhile.
In the meantime, I just noted a few things that I saw out on the web. There are those who say that Trump's indictment was to keep Brandon's own problems from surfacing in the media. One of Brandon's problems is his own problem with documents being found in his possession, which do not belong in his possession. Then there is this problem with the FBI, in which documents pertaining to a bribery being paid to the "big guy" was seemingly being withheld from Congressional oversight.
Then there was a retreat by FBI Director Wray, who released withheld documents with regards to that allegation. The Congress lady aka "MTG" made a statement on Twitter, in which she discussed what she saw with regards to those documents. The documents seem to be quite serious, so that lends support to the idea that just about everything you see here regarding Trump is related to protection of the "big guy"---meaning Brandon. But Bongino says its about protecting the Bamster. That's because the alleged bribery also implicates the Bamster.
My impression therefore, that there is a lot of stuff swirling around under the radar. It looks like Brandon's DOJ went after Trump in order to protect themselves. If so, this indicates a pretty desperate bunch of criminals who are in trouble, but also appear to be beyond the law. Such types could be capable of just about anything, especially now that at least some elements of the government seem to be pursuing them. Hence the indictment of Trump. Also the troubles that Brandon is now having.
Brandon is running again, but there is a chance that he won't be renominated. Even Democrats don't want Brandon to run again, but it is presumably because of his age and physical condition. The trouble with Brandon is that he cannot pull it all off. One remark he made about the accusations being made of him regarding the bribe was to the effect that there is no money. He actually said that. It also so happens that those on the other side of the bribe said that the money will not be traceable for "ten years". This looks like a pretty odd thing for Brandon to say, which is quite coincidental to what the people who bribed him had to say. The point is that Brandon revealed too much, and it may be because of his dementia. In other words, why use the same words and thoughts that the other side of the bribe could say? Brandon can't seem to help himself.
If enough of Brandon's troubles start to look too damaging for Democrat's chances, they may want to dump him. It is inconceivable that they could really expect to win with a guy with that much of a cloud of suspicion hanging over him. That's the same angle being employed against Trump, by the way. There are a lot of people who could be influenced by such reasoning, if it could be called thus.
Perhaps it is all a smoke and mirrors job. Make both candidates look tarnished, and use that as an excuse to get rid of Trump. That's the Establishment's angle. But it was the Establishment that saddled us with Brandon in the first place. They have never liked Trump.
Finally, I don't believe that Trump did anything wrong. These Establishment people have a credibility problem. They may well have ginned up all of this so as to get back in control of the government. Their big hope is that the equivalence angle will allow them to get rid of both of them, when they really only want to get rid of Trump.
It's hard to say where it all leads. But those covering up the crimes are the most guilty looking. Trump's indictments and impeachments are all geared up to protect themselves. Meaning the Deep State, of course.
The polls seem to favor Trump, both for the nomination and the general election. Making Trump look dirty could be a part of the strategy. Brandon and his followers could say the same thing. If it gets into the election with both of these guys, then you can't really trust the election either. Looks like a big mess.
The economy doesn't look good. The recent job numbers look pretty iffy. There's a big discrepancy between the Establishment data and the Household data. This discrepancy is growing over time. The economy is showing recession numbers elsewhere. Claiming strong jobs numbers could be another way to keep the truth from the public, which could hurt Brandon. Hence, the juiced up employment numbers.
All of this doesn't even consider the international situation with Russia and China. Something's gotta give, as the saying goes. But what will that "something" be?
No comments:
Post a Comment