John Solomon sits down with Bannon and talk about J6th

 

Got this clip via Whatfinger. It's a tweet from X, which I will embed here.

🔥“MY REPORTING INDICATES THAT THE FBI IS VERY CLOSE TO BREAKING THE J6 CASE”- John Solomon
He also seems to indicate he thinks they are close to THE GALLOWS BUILDERS. Bannon says that the left is growing MORE BRAZEN by calling for sedition. I agree..that is because the walls… pic.twitter.com/DZkhmAit98

— Johnny St.Pete (@JohnMcCloy) November 21, 2025

Comment:

Hopefully, this isn't raising false expectations. John Solomon is a fairly credible source, or so I think. We'll see how this plays out.

Lots of serious stuff here. Worth a watch.  Just saying here that any attempt at sedition on the part of Democrats will be like stepping into a world of doo-doo.  The doo-doo will get on everybody and everything.  Know what I mean, Vern?

What to make of this video?

It all appears to be a "love-fest". But I won't be fooled. The reports on this guy and his rhetoric was far different from this friendly meeting in the White House. If the leftists thought they were going to get a cage-match between two titans, they must have been disappointed. There's a lot more going on here than what is being reported in the foreign-controlled legacy media.

Culturally, there's the concept of taquiya (or something that is spelled like that), which names that jihadist stratagem of deceiving the infidel, while planning for his subjugation. Why not then fool the public, who have already been fooled enough to votie for someone not like them at all. He speaks out of both sides of his mouth. His words cannot be taken literally.  If he was sincere, why the friendly mode with his foremost adversary?

Trump didn't fight with him. Nor did he give ground. There were no concessions. Just an agreement on ends, but not means. It was a diplomatic exchange. Trump treated him like a foreign leader, which is basically what he is.  Haven't the Democrats basically declared war on this society?

They both may be sincere about their ends. The devil is in the details, which would involve the means. How do you pay for all the freebies that Mamdami is pushing? The governor has rejected higher taxes.  How does he get control of those kind of resources?

Certainly Trump should be expected to oppose any kind of property confiscation---any type of Robin Hood approach. If the intent is to nationalize the means of production, how will this mayor fund a fair acquistion price? It cannot be done.

 

Qatar pumping tens of billions into universities to help Muslim Brotherhood weaken US, ‘destroy democracy’

by Chris Nesi, New York Post

This plan looks a lot like the Gramsci plan. The Gramsci Plan was an influence operation intended to convert America to Marxism through the take over of the commanding heights of the culture. The "leaders" would then institutionalize communism in our country. Sound familiar? If they cannot beat you, they'll make you join them through the coecive power of the mega-state.

What makes the Qatari approach different is that Islam is purportedly a religion, while that making mega-fortunes from the capitalistic pursuit of wealth from oil. While different in its origination and purpose, the strategy is pretty much the same.

This doesn't mean that the Marxists have given up. Indeed, they have joined forces. The Marxists do it through the culture. The Islamists are doing through higher education. The Marxists preach "democracy", but will deliver us into the hands of royalty for our subjugation.

Instead of worring about Israel, shouldn't the public should be worried about this unwarranted influence operation against the best interests of the people of the United States? The intention is to put this country at the service of others from foreign lands. Qatar is not like America---neither in spirit nor history. At the present, it cannot be said to be a friendly country. Yet universities take billions of dollars from them. Where's the outrage?

When this was still a free country, a plot like this would've had little chance. Shouldn't it strike people as odd that the political religion of Islam that inspired the 9-11-2001 terrorist attack on New York City has now produced a mayor who is an Islamist as well as a communist? Why should people not question this and oppose it? But you will be gas-lighted and scolded about Islamophobia and racism if you do dare to object. Just more shut-uppery from our good friends, the leftist dominated Democrats.

 

Trump is MAGA

Others, like MTG, are trying to hijack the term, and use it for their own purposes. Trump has defined MAGA, not MTG then. If not Trump, then who?

In trying to hijack MAGA for whatever her purpose is, she is in fact, de-railing it. If you're not on the Trump-train, then you're not MAGA. Likewise, if you are on the Trump train, then you are MAGA.

One of the favorite tactics of the Establishment is to co-opt it for themselves. So, I think that since the Establishment has been against Trump all along, then MTG is acting in concert with the Establishment.

Who's going to fulfill Trump's vision but Trump? MTG didn't invent it, Trump did. MTG can takeover MAGA, but what will that accomplish? Once they made the useful idiot into one of their own, they will have defeated MAGA too. MTG cannot sustain MAGA, but Trump has been able to despite all the Establishment's hostility towards it.

Trump has done more for MTG than the other way around. She's not loyal to Trump, so he's right to go after her. Don't let yourselves be fooled. The Establishment is out for themselves. Now MTG is just serving them, and not US.

People will confuse this with cultism. Funny how that works. You're a cult because you disagree. But agreeing with the Establishment is the only suitable way to be. So why aren't they a bunch of cultists? It just looks like another case of the politics of Shut UP.

If you don't agree, they will punish you.

 

Experimental post

1:30 PM:

Now I am adding some stuff outside of the box. This post can be updated, with the update inside the box. Or placed on top of the text, and you can scroll down to see the older parts of the post. The newer stuff will stay on top.

1:21 PM, 11/21/25:

Just fooling around with the HTML, and especially the CSS. For those not familiar with the lingo, CSS means cascading style sheets. But there's no style sheets here, just a snippet of code embedded within a webpage that already has significant amounts devoted to CSS.

In other words, I may be trying to "beat the system" with a system of my own for doing posts. Call it a custom post, in lieu of a better way of putting it. Since it is an experiment, try not to take it too seriously. It may not view very well on cell phones and such. I'm thinking the scroll bars might help with that, though.

 

Jasmine Crockett

Just saw a video in which Crockett was asked about the Epstein smear. She's trying to deny that she lied about it. Instead she takes issue with the guy defending himself against a slander. She says of her smear as nothing dishonest, because it was just "a" Epstein, and not "the" Epstein. The man she smears HAS to object, or someone is going to say that he isn't denying taking a campaign donation from "the" Epstein. Everybody knows who she really meant, so this dodge has no credibility.

It would've been better if she just apologized for the mistake, but evidently it WAS no mistake. She really did mean to slander the guy, and to keep slandering those she disagrees.

Totally unfit for public office.

On another matter, I could swear that Fox was trying to take issue with Trump calling Mamdami a communist. Hey, if Trump is getting called "Hitler", then why not let him call Mamdami a commie. After all, if the shoe fits...

I guess there's just too many people who are willing to let things slide by... Glad Trump is hitting back and hard.

With respect to this Mamdami character, if there's a problem with "affordability", he should consider a lighter touch from the government, which has a lot to do with the prices being too high for stuff. Instead, as a true commie, he wants more and more government control.

Government control over food and housing is a good way to insure that there isn't going to be any food and housing. Just like there hasn't been any more landings on the moon, because the politcal left is trying to destroy the guy who can make the rockets that will get us there. By the way, it isn't just the rockets. It's everything that matters, the left will destroy. If you try to object, there will punish you for it. They're already doing that if you try to disagree with them about ANYTHING. The left, who want to be God because they reject God, will make sure that you will fear the God of ever powerful government---meaning themselves. ( as all good commies think)

One more thing before I end this rant... The above paragraph can be backed up by a story I heard about Castro in Cuber. When that pinko got through with Cuber, there wasn't much of anything left... But they have "health care". Anyway, the story is that they had kids pray for ice cream, and when no ice cream appeared; they (the commies) served the kids ice cream. If that isn't assuming the role of God, then what is?

The DC swamp proposes beating China in space by creating another bureaucracy here on Earth

Behind the Black blog

Comment:

Yep, and it is none other than our good, good friend Sen. John Cornball Cornyn, who thought up this monstrosity of an idea.

The LAST thing we need is another government bureaucracy.  It is loaded with Democrats, who don't do anything for space, but sure love to empower themselves at taxpayer expense.  Not only that, they are becoming extraordinarily bent on making this a one-party totalitarian state.  (All the while claiming that Trump is doing it.  This is even more stupid in light of that.)

That's all the more reason to send this knucklehead home.  He never learns.  He might be "better" than a Democrat, but that's like saying suffocating is a better way of dying than burning to death.

Picking your poison with these bozos is very important, but it would help if they had they minds right about what their real role is, and it is NOT to grow the government by another whit.   Indeed, they should be proposing ways to shut down agencies (or downsizing) , not adding or growing new ones.