Didn't she get the memo?
OOPS: Maddow’s Favorite “Russian Connection” Turns Out To Be… https://t.co/cI4B4KRGj6— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) June 17, 2019
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Monday, June 17, 2019
Kiliminik is State Dept
Comment:
Didn't she get the memo?
Didn't she get the memo?
US Govt's Entire Russia-DNC Hacking Narrative Based On Redacted Draft Of Crowdstrike Report
Comment:
By George, I think you've got it.
( not George Will, nor George Soros, but they will )
By George, I think you've got it.
( not George Will, nor George Soros, but they will )
US Govt's Entire Russia-DNC Hacking Narrative Based On Redacted Draft Of Crowdstrike Report | Zero Hedge https://t.co/MYoYzzjoKS— π»ππ πππππππππ ⏳ (@stranahan) June 16, 2019
George Soros connection
Comment:
Soros had to be in this somewhere. "Follow the money."
Took a minute to find it but here's @themarketswork write up on Joneshttps://t.co/66m2bNuIac— Roscoe B Davisπ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@RoscoeBDavis1) June 16, 2019
More on Crowdstrike
Comment:
Follow the link provided to Jeff Carlson's piece. The "marketswork" blog has the article that "technofog" references. Carlson offers a theory as to the significance of the FISA 702 about queries.
One of the contractors discovered in the FISA audit may have been Crowdstrike.
Follow the link provided to Jeff Carlson's piece. The "marketswork" blog has the article that "technofog" references. Carlson offers a theory as to the significance of the FISA 702 about queries.
One of the contractors discovered in the FISA audit may have been Crowdstrike.
For more on Crowdstrike - and questions on whether Crowdstrike accessed raw FISA intel - see this great article by @themarketswork https://t.co/4tmhkJ7qK2— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) June 16, 2019
Sunday, June 16, 2019
Candace Owens v. Cenk Uygur
Comment:
The political trajectories of these two people go in opposite directions. Owens appeared to start as liberal and became conservative. It was the opposite direction for Cenk Uygur.
That said, they share a similar catalyzing event that sent them toward the opposite political direction.
Uygur said it was the Iraq War. Owens was doxxed as a result of starting a website called social autopsy.
Uygur insults Owens, and that's intriguing. Uygur probably sees Owens as a right-wing reactionary. Is there another way of looking at this?
As Ronald Reagan once said, the choice isn't between left or right. It is between freedom or tyranny.
After further review, this may be about race. It appear that Uygur embraces identity politics, whereas Owens rejects it.
The political trajectories of these two people go in opposite directions. Owens appeared to start as liberal and became conservative. It was the opposite direction for Cenk Uygur.
That said, they share a similar catalyzing event that sent them toward the opposite political direction.
Uygur said it was the Iraq War. Owens was doxxed as a result of starting a website called social autopsy.
Uygur insults Owens, and that's intriguing. Uygur probably sees Owens as a right-wing reactionary. Is there another way of looking at this?
As Ronald Reagan once said, the choice isn't between left or right. It is between freedom or tyranny.
After further review, this may be about race. It appear that Uygur embraces identity politics, whereas Owens rejects it.
Cenk: Don‘t Know if Candace Owens is ‘Stupid‘ or Just Money Hungry https://t.co/62ymfOTjWd via @BreitbartNews— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) June 16, 2019
Smell of victory
Comment:
Enemy propaganda often does not acknowledge defeat. However, if the defeat is of enough significance, it cannot be hidden. It was that way after the Battle of Saipan, 75 years ago.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Meanwhile, in a related matter in terms of enemies and their propaganda....
Could it be that enemedia can no longer hide the defeat looming just ahead?
If ethics are critical to Dems, how do they hide this?
Enemy propaganda often does not acknowledge defeat. However, if the defeat is of enough significance, it cannot be hidden. It was that way after the Battle of Saipan, 75 years ago.
The Battle of Saipan was 75 years ago today, June 15, 1944.— Jessie Jane Duff (@JessieJaneDuff) June 15, 2019
The U.S. death toll was 3,426 & over 10,364 wounded in action. 24,000 Japanese were killed.
Please watch and read the thread, a tribute by Marine LtCol Buck Miller's son.
Never forget these men who sacrificed so much. https://t.co/9nPN3qzBje
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Meanwhile, in a related matter in terms of enemies and their propaganda....
Could it be that enemedia can no longer hide the defeat looming just ahead?
If ethics are critical to Dems, how do they hide this?
A Fox poll shows that Dems view ethics as critical and prefer Biden. That’s because warped media has covered up how he brought his son to China, and while he was caving in to China, his son got $1.5 billion investment from China. Corrupt media can’t hide it forever.— Rudy Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) June 16, 2019
The political season approaches
It is still very early in the electoral process. However, I will make a few brief comments on the political scene.
The prospect for the reelection of POTUS Trump appears better than a fifty-fifty bet. His polls numbers are slowly rising. The economy is doing well. So far, there are no new wars.
The Mueller investigation is over. What remains of it is essentially a mopping-up project. Nothing new and damaging is likely to emerge.
The Barr investigations will help him now. Instead of playing defense, he can play offense. The news from these investigations will harm his opponents.
That's good news. However, the variables of peace and prosperity change the prospects daily. Job growth appears to be slowing down. The Iranians are attacking shipping in the Persian Gulf. Worrying trade difficulties with China roil the markets. The markets gyrate in response. The yield curve indicates weakness ahead. These factors may go against him yet.
It appears he is on track for re-election, but it is not guaranteed.
The prospect for the reelection of POTUS Trump appears better than a fifty-fifty bet. His polls numbers are slowly rising. The economy is doing well. So far, there are no new wars.
The Mueller investigation is over. What remains of it is essentially a mopping-up project. Nothing new and damaging is likely to emerge.
The Barr investigations will help him now. Instead of playing defense, he can play offense. The news from these investigations will harm his opponents.
That's good news. However, the variables of peace and prosperity change the prospects daily. Job growth appears to be slowing down. The Iranians are attacking shipping in the Persian Gulf. Worrying trade difficulties with China roil the markets. The markets gyrate in response. The yield curve indicates weakness ahead. These factors may go against him yet.
It appears he is on track for re-election, but it is not guaranteed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)