Thursday, February 17, 2022

Doxxing cannot be justified that way



Doxxing Canadian Trucker donors

What's the justification for doxxing the donors to the Canadian Trucker protestors? Why, it's a insurrection, it is claimed. Funny how that word keeps popping up.



The reason for posting on this is that these loony tunes want to establish themselves as the state. Therefore, any opposition to them is insurrection, you see. If the Constitution in the US is the state, you are in insurrection if you want to overthrow IT. But if you are opposed to a political party and/or the leader of that party, you aren't in insurrection to the STATE. Since that was Canada, the law is different. But the principle is the same. These people want to be seen as the state, when in fact, if it is a democracy, the PEOPLE are the sovereigns. The Constitution of the US has a PREAMBLE which begins "WE THE PEOPLE". Does Canada have this? If it doesn't, then how is it a democracy? Wherein does the state's citizens owe their allegiance? To Trudeau? In the US, all officers of the Constitution, including the President, must swear an oath to the Constitution, which is ordained by the PEOPLE.

Actually, as I understand it, the head of the state in the British Commonwealth is the Queen. So, is Trudeau now the KING??? Or is the insurrection to Trudeau the same as insurrection to the Queen? Or how does it work in Canada? Certainly cannot be said that to oppose the US President is tantamount to treason. Nor to insurrection. The January 6th protestors weren't trying to overthrow the US Constitution. They were protesting an allegedly dishonest election. Surely, the Canadian truckers aren't trying to overthrow the Canadian government. But even if getting Trudeau sacked was their objective, this isn't insurrection. Is that hard to understand? Trudeau is claiming to be the state, not just the head of state, but the state itself.

The word "insurrection" may be another one of those "magic" words that justify the actions in which could not be taken otherwise. If it is "insurrection", then extraordinary actions must be taken to prevent an overthrow to the government. Even the act upon which Trudeau is justifying his acts says that it wouldn't be legal in any other context. But is that what the truckers seek to do? Is it Trudeau and his supporters who are claiming that they are trying to prevent an insurrection? Really? For it to be that, Trudeau would have to be the state, and he cannot be that unless something else has changed.

The same is true of the January 6th protestors in the USA. They weren't trying to overthrow the US Constitution, so how could they be insurrectionists? Even if the idea was to overthrow the incoming Biden Administration, that isn't insurrection. For Biden isn't the state. That's the case unless something fundamental has changed, and Biden is now considered to be the state.

No comments: