Friday, May 12, 2017


Note that this is called hearsay in courtrooms.  The Democrats want a special prosecutor on the flimsiest of pretexts, and to support it, they rely upon hearsay that reporters put out there.

They’re gonna find an anonymous source that’s once or three times removed from Comey who says, “I don’t think that the director would ever say that.” They’re not gonna find somebody to deny it outright.--- Rush Limbaugh

Incidentally, even if somebody denied it outright, it would still be hearsay!  They cannot even get that!

Comey has to deny himself (that he said something), or otherwise it means nothing.

Update(s): 8:23:

There's a saying with regard to these type of situations.  It goes something like this: if you have the facts on your side, you pound the facts.  If you have the law on your side, you pound the law.  If you have neither the law nor the facts on your side, you pound the table.

The Democrats have neither the law nor the facts on their side.  So, they are pounding the table.  They have been doing that since last November, when it was apparent that Hillary lost the election.

How long can they pound the table?  Until November next year?


Anonymous leaks are said to be making Trump paranoid.  But why are they anonymous? Are whistleblowers protected?  What retribution can be directed towards them if they made themselves known?

These people are said to be "patriots".  They are traitors.  If there was anything factual, why not say so openly?  You have to do that in court, you know.  You cannot convict someone based upon secret testimony.


Aren't we not supposed to have rule of law?  If a president is to be forced out, should it not be because of some violation of law?  What law has been violated?  In all these months, it has yet to be identified.  This is not rule of law.  This is a cabal of men who seek to bring down a president just because of a political disagreement.  If it is a law, then name it.  Set up the witnesses and take the testimony in open court under oath.  Under a rule of law, that would be the procedure.

Furthermore, the Kayfabe, or fakery of this should be clear.  Anybody can lie behind cover.


Let's see.  We've got mystery laws, mystery witnesses, and now mysterious threats.  But what is the biggest mystery of all?   That I give a crap.  But hey, we're thrown into the battle, and the people must have battles.

We can call it the mystery battle.


Looks like somebody besides myself thinks the country has gone batshit crazy.  It isn't just media, and it isn't just Democrats, unfortunately.

But let's soldier on in this mystery battle.  If for no other reason than to see what's on the other side of this shit.  Probably the same old assholes.

Somebody's gotta do it.

No comments: