- editor of New Energy, prepared for meeting in SF
- not recommended for people of fixed beliefs
- significant amount of helium in experiments
- assumption, but only assumptions, didn't know about electroweak interaction
- equation dumbed down
- assuming helium coming out with low energy and no other nuclear products
- list of reactions- how does cold fusion explain- goes through list - doesn't add up
- separate set of phenomena
- 'know' that there are no other phenomena in cells
- helium retention hypothesis
- helium release from accumulation of helium
- discussion of chart
- how to explain the discrepancy?
- want to think it is simple- Occam's Razor. But not what nature is saying.
- Cold fusion theory can't explain it.
- Various explanations and their flaws
- No explanation of Lenr
- Cold Fusion using term FPE Flieishmann Pons Effect
- Use of term 'cold fusion' doesn't help Lenr
- "It is nuclear and it is Lenr"
- Doesn't look like fusion- not friendly comments from believers
- "Leave faith to religion and bring science back to Lenr"
Update:
Here's a write up that may or may not be easier to follow.
Update:
16. Cold Fusion Versus LENR: Competing Ideologies [ my comment: yes, it is a war which decides who has the theory that better fits the observations- not a theory that denies the phenomenon itself , therefore the argument doesn't repudiate the phenomena- that's a relief]
No comments:
Post a Comment