But where exactly is this happening "on the right"? By the way, I've asked why those "on the right" keep on using the leftist's terminology of "right-v-left"? Methinks that somebody's not asking the right questions.
An example is the OJ Simpson trial, in which Simpson was found "not guilty". The verdict was "not guilty", as opposed to "total innocence". I accept the verdict even if I disagree with it. Likewise, I can disagree with what the DOJ has done in the case of the Epstein files, but that doesn't mean that I believe what they say. Nor would I claim it so.
Of course, those who defend the DOJ might do that. Just as there were those who claimed that OJ Simpson was wrongfully accused of the double murder of his wife and Ronald Goldman.
P.S.
Steve Bannon has said some questionable things. That dude, and other self-proclaimed "influencers" aren't going to control what I think. Steve Bannon is entitled to say whatever the hell he wants, but I'm not obligated to believe a single word of it. I'm going to think whatever the hell I want. So should everybody. Just because Steve Bannon says something doesn't mean that it's the Gospel Truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment