The thing that grabs me here is to refer to someone as "pure evil". But she looks harmless enough. You have to read through the replies to get a flavor of this.
I'm not a Catholic, so I won't comment on this too much. My recollection is that I read once that the Catholic Church would excommunicate members who did unapproved things. What she did certainly does seem to be unapproved, or should be. This is not something that Catholics should be doing, this so-called "gender-affirming" care thing. It should be totally forbidden. Otherwise, it is gravely sinful. Just my opinion based upon admittedly incomplete information.
The Church should not have employees who aren't in good standing. If this had been followed, the opportunity to do harm would have been reduced. Moreover, if this shooter had been properly handled, he would've been put in an insane asylum, and maybe in a straight jacket. Such a person is a danger to himself and to others. Again, just my opinion.
Finally, the system in Minnesota has a great deal of responsibility here... There is a very good reason for the liberals to be frantically trying to change the subject to gun-control. The full faith and credit clause of the Constitution makes this a Federal Issue, and should be taken up by the courts. A conservative leaning Court SHOULD strike down the Minnesota law. But that isn't guaranteed. Of course, a liberal one would do the same as they did with all the other "skin suit" issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment