That last post made me connect some dots with the respect to liberals.
As I wrote in that post, she could not possibly believe that the same standards would apply to herself as she applies to those she disagrees with.
But isn't that the way liberals generally act? Don't they have the attitude that if you disagree with them that they have the right to punish you? Don't they have the tendency to act as if they have the right to tell you to shut up? Killing you for displeasing is a sure way to get you to shut up for good.
Liberals are dangerous for our democratic institutions. Liberals may be physically dangerous becuase they seem to think that Martin had the right to beat up Zimmerman for following him. Liberals are dangerous to our tradition of self-defense because they don't seem to think Zimmerman had the right to defend himself from a deadly threat.
The only defense for this attitude is that they must not believe that Zimmerman was threatened with murder. For if they actually do believe in self-defense, their objection has to be based upon some objective fact. But what could that be? Does anyone really believe that Martin was on top of Zimmerman beating the hell out of him and yelling for help too? Are you kidding me?
Therefore, liberals are lying their asses off about the facts of this case, or they are in some type of pathological state that makes them truly dangerous. It's hard to tell if they really believe some of what they are saying sometimes. This needs to be sorted out and discovered if it is true or not, for if they are truly dangerous, we are definitely headed for big trouble here.
No comments:
Post a Comment