Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Robert Bussard's IEC Fusion device

I first learned about this work several years ago, perhaps it was
in 2006.  He made a presentation on YouTube, which I can't link
to here, but I remember it well.

Two things I remembered: 1) it was hard to follow and to understand,
and 2) I was struck at his confidence level in his work.  He said quite
flatly that it will work.  Bussard is dead now, this was his last work.
He wanted to share it with the world before his death.  Little was
published about it because it had to fly under the radar so as to
avoid interference from those who would stop the program.  It was
a Navy program and it was under a publishing embargo for 11 years.
Obviously, Bussard was no crackpot, he was the real deal.

The reason I am writing about Bussard's device is in connection to
the book that I have been writing about: "Mining the Sky".  It turns out
that this device can be used in a space ship, and it would be one
heck of a space ship.  Such a ship could take off like a plane and
go into orbit.  It could fly to Mars and back.  By way of powerful and
efficient fusion power, this thing could go anywhere in the solar system.
That would include trips to the asteroid belt where the mineral wealth
there is sufficient enough to make everyone on Earth a billionaire many
times over.

Bussard lamented the mindset that is commonplace in the Western
world these days.  His biggest problem was not the physics of the
device, but in getting funds to do his work.  The funds required is
small- almost ridiculously small- in terms of the potential benefits
that could be obtained from a succesful device of this type.  But no
one seems to care.  There is plenty of money in this country to try
out this device, but too many people don't understand it, nor are
interested enough in it to try to understand.

Human emotions are easy enough to understand.  Greed, power,
and self preservation.  First of all, greed.  You could motivate someone
by appealing to their desire for great wealth.  Certainly a device that
would allow one to tap the mineral wealth of the asteroids is certainly
enough to motivate somebody out there.  Secondly, power.  A device
like this has military value.  This should be so obvious that it needs
little explanation.  The shorthand for this is that whoever dominates
the high ground will win the battles.  Finally, self preservation.  A device
like this may save the human race.  It could make the deserts bloom,
so that there should be no shortage of water nor food anywhere.  It
can defend the skies from rogue asteroids that have the potential to
end civilization and even life itself on this planet.  The only excuse to
not to develop this device is to be dead.  If you're alive, then you should
be vitally interested in it.

But what if it doesn't work?  That doesn't stop governments from
spending huge sums of money on other projects that have no more
merit than this one.  Actually, it doesn't stop governments from
spending huge amounts of money on projects with less merit
than this one.  That is what Bussard was worried about.  Too many
people have too many reasons to oppose this project for reasons
that have nothing to do with its merit or lack of same.  It is part
of the inertia that is threatening all of us.  It may take something
to wake up the policy makers.  Hopefully this won't take too long.

pB11 fusion reaction yields 3 alpha particles (Helium nucleii)

5 comments:

Dave said...

FWIW, Bussard's work was picked up by Rick Nebel of POPS fame. They validated Bussard's work and got funding for a larger device. If he was right fusion power is a few years away.

more here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell

Polywell FAQ:
http://www.ohiovr.com/polywell-faq/index.php?title=Main_Page

discussion ongoing here: http://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/index.php

Greg said...

Thanks for the links. I am getting up to speed on this in a number of ways. As I wrote in my post, I didn't understand the device at first. Now I think I understand much better than I did before. I think it would be helpful for folks to be persistent in studying this material. It is probably not the easiest thing for non scientists to grasp, but if it is grasped, it is one more believer in the fold. With enough believers, this work can get the support it needs in order to be successful.

Dave said...

Yep, it's a complicated, esoteric device. I've remarked several times that it's difficult for anyone who hasn't studied it for years to string together three sentences without making major mistakes.

I've found it's most easily understood as an ETW (Elmore Tuck Watson) machine modified with a shielded anode grid and magnetically compressed/confined virtual cathode.

Keep an eye out for events around April and October 2011. There are follow-on options to the Navy contract -- one of which is for an honest-to-God 100MW net power fusion reactor.

Greg said...

Well, the physics of it is beyond me. It was helpful to download Tom Ligon's pdf file which explains this device very well in terms that I think most non-physicists could understand.

For example, I had a misconception that the device contains plasma - not electrons.

Also, I didn't know that an electron-volt computes into degrees Kelvin. A simple equation gives you the measurement of the of the energy potential. A simple boob tube has the thermal equivalence of 200 million degrees Kelvin. So why does your TV not melt? I think it is because electricity is one type of electromagnetic radiation and heat is another. Thus it is plausible to me why heat is not a problem as far as those two factors are concerned.

To get the fusion, they are using the electron confinement to accelerate the two positively charged ions and the resulting collisions are what enables the fusion to take place and the energy to be produced. From that point, it is a matter of capturing the energy for useful work.

Excessive heat is still an issue, but it would take a lot more understanding of the device for me to puzzle out the rest of the device.

That's my understanding at this time. I don't have plans of becoming a physicist, so I don't think I will study the physics of it any further than that. I think I got the basics of the device.

As far as funding the research goes, I think it would be helpful to get as many people interested in this as possible. If the government can fund the Tokomak concept, which is far more complex and costly, it can certainly fund this. I hope I can do my own small part in generating interest in this work, and let the politics of it handle the rest.

Steven Meadows said...

So, if I follow this correctly, if you take peanut butter and put it on a slice of this platform they call bread and place this other substance that's called jelly on another slice of bread, you get a delicious tasting conglomeration called a PB&J?