It seems pretty obvious this event is a big joke, one that is likely trying to prove a point. Why is it okay to be proud of being gay, but not proud of being straight? Better yet, why does one have to be “proud” of their sexual orientation, skin color, or anything else outside of the realm of personal achievement?---Conservative Tribune
comment: This gives me the opportunity to express a thought that I've had rumbling back and forth in my noggin. Is there a such a thing as "gay"? All being "gay" is is the rejection of Judeo-Christian moral ethics. Nobody is "gay" even if they practice same-sex sexual habits. "Gayness" is more a political and social identity than a sexual one. When somebody "comes out", they are making a political and social statement, not a sexual statement. After all, the sexual practice doesn't change, but the attitude towards it does.
Let's make a comparison to illustrate the point I hope to make. Let's say you are morbidly obese. Then some "brilliant" jackass gets the idea that being morbidly obese is actually a good thing and sets up an organization that celebrates members' morbid obesity. This doesn't help the morbid obese person to lose weight and be more healthy, but it does help them feel better about themselves. The question is who is really benefiting from this state of affairs? The ones organizing the "pride" event, or the morbidly obese persons?
Politics tends to help the agitators, not the ones who are purporting being "cared about".
No comments:
Post a Comment