Where do you go for truth?

Here's an observation based upon that last post.  That last post was about Lerner's "testimony" that wasn't.  Somebody is lying because there's no way that both can be right.  So, who's lying?  Issa or the Lerner camp?

I read something yesterday on Barnhardt's site that may make some sense in this---maybe they are both conniving to lie for the political theater of it all.  Divide and conquer.  They need to have us fighting each other so that they can rule over all of us.  So, maybe both are lying in some way because they want this political theater in order to stoke mistrust amongst the followers of each political party.

That part of the Barnhardt's piece I can agree with because that is what I've posted many times here.  It is usually categorized here on this blog as "politics schmolitics".

Another example?  We were told that Russia wouldn't invade Ukraine, but they did.  Russia says they didn't, but it looks like they did.  Besides that, back in 2005 or so, there was then Senator Barack Obama and Senator Lugar, who both acted to disarm Ukraine.  Now, Obama is acting like a Cold Warrior.  There something there that doesn't add up.  Now that he is President, we are supposed to believe that he really wants to get tough with Russia?  Well, I've already written a couple times that I'm suspicious.  I've always been suspicious of Obama, truth be told.

Yet another example is this recently completed primary election, in which Cornyn is reelected.  He is reelected because he has no serious Democrat opposition in November.  The real election was yesterday.  Cornyn will win reelection.  Now, those who supported Cornyn offered the excuse that if Cornyn lost, the Democrats would pour money into Texas and possibly take the Senate race here.  Well, they'd have to do some fancy footwork to do that.  There's no serious competitor on the Democratic side either.  Perhaps it would have made the race more competitive, but what would be wrong with that?  The truth be told, nobody really wants to change anything even though they say that they do.  "Cornball" is a big fake, and this excuse won't fly.  Democrats really don't have much of a chance here unless the Establishment acted to defeat the nominee, which is possible.  That's the only way that seat would have gone blue if Cornyn had lost.

What do you make of all this?  I don't know, but with respect to Russia, somebody here in the US wants them to become the Soviet Union again.  Sure looks that way.

The IRS thing I can't figure, but it looks like both sides want the theater in order to fire up the troops.

Phony baloney stuff that doesn't solve problems.  That's politics schmolitics.  What we could use is a little truth here, but don't count on that.  The truth may set us free, but you have to seek it, because these people won't reveal it in a million years.

Is anybody really interested in the truth?