Sigh...

It's like some people don't ever think through a thing to its logical conclusion.

Here's Glenn Reynolds comparing global warming theory to homosexuality.

This is the guy hawking his wife's book about men being on strike.  If he took the proposition to its conclusion, would he ever begin to realize that men are not being valued enough in order that would allow them to be men, as opposed to something less than men?  Like Rush said, there are a lot out there who are the new castrati.  Not to say that this means that Rush sees it my way, though.  He may have been brainwashed as well.  In fact, I'm quite sure he has.  He doesn't seem to get it either.

Men are being emasculated.  That's what happens when a society "gangs up" on an individual and makes him accept something that may not be true, but only what the culture says is true.  The individual man doesn't stand a chance.  Especially one who may be weak in some way.  It's this way ( that people are bullied ) regardless of whether homosexuality is a disease or not.  Therefore, if homosexuality is encouraged by the greater society than the individual, there's going to be more of it.  If it is discouraged, there's going to be less of it.  It's what society wants that makes the difference.

I assert that this society wants more homosexuality and is certainly getting it.  I assert that it has nothing to do with genetics but everything to do with what society wishes and desires for itself.

Society has been brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality is inevitable.  It wasn't always this way, and I think that is a bad thing for this society.

Don't tell me guys are born this way and then try to hawk your old lady's book, Mr. Reynolds.  You lose all your credibility.

Just for the record, I think that homosexuality should be considered a disease.  Although it may not have a solid cure.  Or any cure at all.  For example, diabetes is a disease.  It can only be treated, it can't be cured.  At least not to my knowledge.