Good morning. It appears that a certain US Senator has made a certain proposal in the debt limit negotiations which have Michelle Malkin a bit upset.
If one reads the Constitution, the Senator is offering to take away the power of the purse from the House, which shouldn't be acceptable to the House anyway. Why would any House member agree to that, unless their party loyalty is greater than their loyalty to the Consitution itself, and against their own interests as House members?
This is being suggested as a way to avoid responsibility for dealing with the problem. I notice that the Republicans and Democrats are still playing political games. Why not just deal with the problem instead of worrying about their political futures?
No comments:
Post a Comment