Excerpt:
Given the lack of evidence of any concrete problem, any harm Appellants seek to remedy with the proposed amendment is speculative at best and cannot support a compelling interest.
Comment:
This is not the same as saying that a ban on sharia is unconstitutional. It only says that no harm has been demonstrated, therefore there is no reason for relief.
Sharia needs to be studied and this should in no way be considered an endorsement for sharia. That is how this decision should be seen. Unfortunately, that is not probably how it will be reported.
No comments:
Post a Comment