Is this a lie?

Let's develop this theory that I have about liberals selling their souls to the Devil.

First of all, the liberals probably don't believe that they are doing this, as they will probably say that there is no such thing as a Devil.  Since they are materialists, and do not believe in such things as the supernatural, it is quite natural that they would scoff at such a suggestion.

I got this idea about liberals and the Devil, from reading from the Gospel of John, which says that Satan is the father of all lies.  Also, something I saw once before in the book "Success From a Positive Mental Attitude".  That book discusses how Al Capone believed that necessity made him become dishonest.  A liberal, or anyone else for that matter, could rationalize dishonesty because necessity forced them to.  But this book pointed out something that could be a game changer for anybody who reads it, and takes it to heart.  It is this:  nothing forces you to be dishonest.  And this:  necessity is the mother of invention, and the father of crime.  That is right.  If you allow necessity to "force" you to be dishonest, you are likely on the road to a criminal career.  Undoubtedly to me, a liberal will deny this vociferously.  He believes that he is a good person.  So did Al Capone.

Hence, my suspicion that liberals are inherently dishonest.  If they weren't dishonest, they would stop being liberals.  Have you ever seen liberals be honest about what they talk about?  Whether it is gun control, climate change, marriage "equality", or what have you, liberalism is inherently dishonest.  It is necessary to lie, so that they can "win" because without it, they will lose.

So, what are liberals doing when they lie?  They get an advantage that they would not have otherwise.  Hence, this is why they believe that it is necessary.  That much, and that they know that they are wrong.  You don't go down the wrong path unless you know that you can get away with it, because the fear of punishment is much diminished.  It can become diminished when enough of these liberals corrupt the political and social contract of a jurisdiction to such a degree that punishment becomes unlikely.  Washington DC, anyone????  Once the corruption is deep enough, nothing can be done to stop them.  The legal system has been disabled.

Now for this, the story that I am referring to in the title of the post.   The liberal is calling the NRA a terrorist organization.  Now, I don't believe that even the liberals believe this is true.  They make this crap up in order to get an advantage.  They know full well that the NRA is no such thing.  So, they call the NRA a terrorist organization because they believe that it will get them an advantage.

Does it work?  Yes, it must work, or they would not be doing it.

The conservative response is to dig for the truth and "get it out there".  But what happens is that the liberals will smother this so that people will only hear their side of the story, and a lot of people will be deceived, and that is how the liberals can win.

There is no other way to me to describe this but a commitment to evil.  It must be in the DNA of liberalism to go this route.

Perhaps it is the "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky that can explain this.  Alinsky dedicated his book to Satan, if you heard that one.  Maybe he wasn't kidding.  Liberals are very serious about what they do.  You cannot underestimate them at any time.