A comparison.
Scooter Libby was accused of blowing Valerie Plame's cover. If her cover was blown, he didn't do it. The newpaper guy did it. He admitted doing it. Libby was convicted anyway, because the left needed a scalp. He wasn't convicted of what he was accused of doing, he was convicted of a process crime.
Valerie Plame's identity was said to be "classified information". It is the same kind of information that is at the heart of the problem with Hillary.
Now, let's compare the treatment of Libby to that of Hillary. There is more to convict her of the process crimes that Libby was convicted of, if anything, she is guilty as sin of at least perjury before you even get to the main accusations. Is there really any doubt that she did this? It's the FBI saying this stuff. It isn't originating from the RNC, despite what the Clintonoids say. They already have enough to convict, so why the hesitation?
Is it because Clinton is a Democrat, and Libby is a Republican?
Naah!!! Nothing like that!
/sarc
Just for funsies, does anybody remember Susan McDougal? She was testifying about another of the endless Clinton scandals, the Whitewater affair. As the "G" man, G. Gordon Liddy, pointed out on his radio show, she couldn't answer any more questions under oath without implicating the Clintons. Rather than do this, she decided to take the fall herself. She was charged with contempt with refusal to answer the questions put to her.
The Clintons have been demonstrably guilty for the longest time. It's high time to end this and hustle them out of the public square. They are an embarrassment. If the government is going to be corrupt, they should at least be more discreet about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment