If it is subversive, then it can be banned. Or can it?
Note: BTW, this is what I forgot about, which was mentioned in the last post. This jogged my memory.
As I've been saying, I am amazed at how something that is so plainly efficacious in ending the threat of terrorism in this country can be so easily cast aside by those who claim to be on the side of national security.
It's not that hard. The argument is going to be that it is too hard.
Look. Read the book, if you can find it, about the KGB. In it, there is a big story about how they tried to infiltrate a so-called "illegal" into the United States for the purposes of espionage. The "illegal" underwent a ton of training, yet he was discovered very quickly by the FBI, and turned to our side. Keep in mind, this case was before the immigration laws were changed in 1965. Back then, there were PSAs on TV which continually reminded "aliens" to register with the government. Obviously, they were serious about stopping people who might do harm to our country once upon a time. Maybe not so much today.
This case referred to was one in which the missiles were discovered in Cuba. Without this policy in effect, which no longer is in effect, the missiles may not have been discovered in time, and Castro would have nuclear missiles in his country. This could have been catastrophic, and it almost resulted in a war anyway.
So you see. Keeping out the bad guys is absolutely necessary. Even ONE of them can be very dangerous.
Trump is right. Unfortunately, too many people in this country don't recognize how important this is.
Sharia is subversive. It undermines the rule of law of any host country that permits it. Why should sharia be any different from any other group- let's say Nazis? We couldn't stop Naziism? Or communism?
Get off it.
Sharia as practiced makes them the enemy. If they practice it, they are subversives and should be removed IMMEDIATELY.
I ask again, those of you in the GOP who have a problem with Trump. What the f*)k is your problem?
No comments:
Post a Comment