Obama's re-election would reward failure

This post will be made with an insistence upon truth.  As it will be thought of as being nothing more than partisan hatchet job.

Several questions need to be asked and answered honestly for those who dare:

1. Why is Romney's Bain Capital background a minus and not a plus?  Since when did success become a liability?
2. Why does the defense of America become a problem and not a solution?  Why abandon America's defense if it is worth defending?
3. Why do policy makers insist upon the most complex and expensive ways to solve an alleged problem like global warming--- such as cellulosic ethanol as a biofuel?  Why not a simpler and cheaper way --- such as pyrolysis of switchgrass?
4. Why do policy makers insist upon ineffective and expensive ways of providing clean energy such as solar and wind energy --- when such things as molten salt nuclear reactor technology is feasible and has been feasible for decades?
5. Update:  Why continue to fund expensive fusion projects like ITER, when a cheaper and simpler way may be found?  Examples:  Polywell and Focus Fusion.  Others exist as well.
6. Why credit someone for defending America when he insists upon blaming it for a problem that he himself would not address in Benghazi?
7. Why listen to the media when they are so often wrong about so many things?  
8. In short---Why punish success and reward failure?  Isn't the re-election of Obama just exactly that?