Limbaugh used that phrase during the 1995 Congressional v Clinton budget fight. Yes, I have LONG noted the fundamental dishonesty of the Democrats, believe me on that one. You can say that Rush and I are in agreement on that one.
I would take it further, since I came up with yet another argument against AGW.
It is based upon memory, but that shouldn't discount its veracity. During the Apollo years, I recall one of the astronauts discussing the lunar surface. He said that there is a stark difference in TEMPERATURES between the sunlight places and the shade.
What is the significance of that? Well, there is no atmosphere on the moon. Recall that the leftist media sites like to refer to "heat trapping gasses" when they mean carbon dioxide. As I have been pointing out, gasses cannot trap heat. Gasses can only CARRY HEAT AWAY to somewhere else. Note that trapping something means keeping it in one place. It seems that the lunar surface is an example of how a solid object will KEEP HEAT IN PLACE, while on Earth, a gaseous atmosphere CARRIES IT AWAY. Could it be said that the Earth is a COOLER place than it would be without an atmosphere? Possibly!
In other words, the reference to heat trapping gasses is fundamentally false. There isn't an ounce of truth in it.
Going further, I would venture that those making that claim care little about the truth of the matter, and are therefore LYING.
Like the Biggest Lie in American History, AGW may make the history books as one of the biggest lies of all time.
No comments:
Post a Comment