Another reason to doubt AGW

Science is held in high esteem, but is that justified?  There are many reasons to doubt that which may seem beyond reproach.

There's nothing in this article about AGW at all, but since the authority of science is invoked in supporting the AGW hypothesis, it becomes harder to argue against it.  This way is to argue against the science establishment itself.

But care must be taken.  Although science is a good thing after all, it is not infallible.  Science can be self-correcting, but the correction is filed away long afterwards when nobody is looking.

One can also see from this article how some new thing is always being shot down in favor of the established way.

As my science teacher once said, "a scientist is a seeker of truth", to which I say, but "the truth is a slippery thing".

There are plenty of reasons to doubt AGW.  Just open your eyes and see for yourself.  Don't let someone else do your thinking for you.