It seems like a tempest in a teapot, or should be.
Here are a few observations and questions that I gleaned from reading a Wikipedia Entry on the controversy:
- Why are people so upset when A&E says that they are "strong supporters and champions of the LGBT community"---- I mean, what do you expect from A&E anyway.
- Being that they are strong supporters of so-called "LGBT" community, what they hell are you doing patronizing their products?
- What the hell is Phil Robertson doing there anyway?
- What business is it of A&E that Phil Robertson has opinions of his own? Do they get the right to censor his beliefs and to punish him if he dares express them?
If this administration so chose, which obviously they don't, they could proceed with a suit against A&E for the violation of Robertson's civil rights.
As for the organization called "GLAAD", they could face criminal charges. What makes their behavior any different from a cross burning?
Anyway, his remarks on the interview with GQ were rather mild and unremarkable. The reaction is way the hell overwrought. Especially from these so-called LGBT types.
Update:
I read the entire interview and I am amazed at how they made a big shitstorm out of this. Maybe if people got a little curious and read it for themselves, they might be surprised too. There's nothing to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment