www.nysun.com
The comparison with Clinton is way over the top. It may be possible the Newt is flawed, but Clinton was on a entirely different level. After all, he was accused of rape. It was apparent that Clinton was active in suppressing the evidence of his philandering. So much so that he committed perjury.
If there's any evidence of wrongdoing, let it be aired out. But not this Herman Cain type accusations. There needs to be solid and definite proof, not just mere accusations and innuendos.
No comments:
Post a Comment