Note: Bicho raro may mean "strange beast" in Spanish. Google translate says "rare bug". In Hemingway's For Whom The Bell Tolls, it seemed more like "rare beast" -- an insult.
Now she is saying that there should have been no retaliation for the 9-11 attacks.
Uh-huh.
Actually, given how freaking strange the so-called blue states are becoming, AOC may have a point. Before all of you so-called "conservatives" go apeshit, let me explain.
Isn't the reaction to 9-11 a defensive reaction to an attack on our country? But what if that country no longer exists? How can it exist when she talks like this, with no consequences? Does this mean that she condones the attack? One would presume that she would not condone the attack unless she was in sympathy with the enemy. So, why are we defending the likes of people who would elect this traitor?
Frankly, I always had some extreme doubts about the left when it came to the 9-11 attacks. What AOC is doing is expressing why my doubts were justified. What AOC should be doing is hiding her contempt for this country, the way most of her party has been doing all along. So, now she is being clear about it.
I didn't really expect that the left was really loyal to this country, and that is why the terrorists attacked on 9-11. Clinton really didn't do enough to stop OBL while he was POTUS. He could have disposed of OBL when Sudan offered to give him up. So, it is quite evident that these people are not loyal to this country. This latest business with AOC only goes to show you that this is quite justified.
But the Dems won't give her up. The Dems are in bed with the leftists, who are trying to destroy this country.
It ought to be be clear. But is AOC really in such a strong position that she can really drop the mask, and show them for what they really are? She is really rather foolish.
No comments:
Post a Comment