That's old news, huh? Not really. It could well have been an early warning of what is happening right before our eyes right now.
It struck me just now, that while reading the book Outrage, by Vincent Bugliosi, that there were no eyewitnesses to the murder. Nor anybody who at least heard a commotion during the murder as it was happening. You see, how does a murderer kill two people with nobody hearing a single thing nor seeing a single thing? It wasn't mentioned in the book, that I can recall.
We seem to have plenty of witnesses to "groping", but to a murder there was NOBODY?????
Consider the type of murder it was. It was quite physical. Wouldn't there have been a lot of NOISE??????? There wasn't any guns involved. Just a man with a knife managed to kill two people, one of them a man. PUHLEEZE. The very fact that a man was able to kill two people in the second largest city in the nation without WITNESSES seems rather odd to me. Nobody was willing to come forward at the trial?
Why do you suppose that there are a large number of "witnesses" to "groping" when there is no witness to a brutal murder of two people?
People are afraid to come forward, don't you think? But they are not afraid to come forward in the case of the "gropings". I think they both have something in common. The murder witnesses that didn't come forward were lying by omission. Those that do come forward now about groping are lying by commission.
I don't believe the women. They did something to provoke the men, most likely. Then they run to the authorities with their complaints, which the authorities are all too willing to believe. The usual suspects capitulate because they just cannot do anything.
My ass. Nobody does anything because they are too damn weak to do anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment